Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[10]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[9]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[10]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-09-22 21:09:09.384
	1	+2016-09-22 21:09:09.0

Caselist.CitesClass[9]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,79 @@
	1	+====A. Interpretation: The affirmative must specify a specific country or countries that are banning nuclear power. To clarify, they cannot just defend "countries" as a whole====
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+====B. Violation:====
	5	+
	6	+
	7	+====C. Standards:====
	8	+
	9	+
	10	+====1) Textuality – country is defined as government within a specific territory ====
	11	+**The Law Dictionary '16** (The Law Dictionary ft. Black's Law Dictionary 2nd edition, copyright 2016, http://thelawdictionary.org/country/~~-~~-ghs//sk)
	12	+COUNTRY? The portion of the earth's surface occupied by an independent nation or people
	13	+AND
	14	+the state, or the government, having possession and dominion over a territory
	15	+
	16	+
	17	+====Resolved implies a policy implemented by a specific legislative instrument====
	18	+**Louisiana House '05**, 3-8-2005, http://house.louisiana.gov/house-glossary.htm
	19	+Resolution A legislative instrument that generally is used for making declarations, stating policies,
	20	+AND
	21	+, 13.1 , 6.8 , and 7.4)
	22	+
	23	+
	24	+====Textuality is key to fairness – it's always the most predictable====
	25	+**Merrell '15**, Brandon Merrell (Graduate Student, UC San Diego). "Back to Its Roots: Why Topicality Standards Should Assess Definitional Accuracy Rather than Debate Utility." 2015. DRAFT accessed summer 2014. JDN. Updated version available at: http://www.brandonmerrell.com/papers/Merrell20-20Topicality.pdf
	26	+Why is it essential to accurately define the resolution? As Brownlee (1981)
	27	+AND
	28	+topicality must be even more rigorously protected in parli than in other events.
	29	+
	30	+
	31	+====And, textuality prevents judge intervention====
	32	+**Diers '10**, Audra R. Diers (Assistant Professor in Organizational Communication and Public Relations at Marist College). "Drawing the Line in the Sand: Re-grounding the Theory and Practice of Topicality Debate." National Forensics Journal, 28(1). Summer 2010. JDN. https://b55eec4b-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/nationalforensicsassociation/research/nfa-journal/vol28no1-2.pdf
	33	+The Resolutional Approach. The other primary approach to topicality argumentation articulates a 'truth'
	34	+AND
	35	+debate as a game, where the resolution only functions to divide ground.
	36	+
	37	+
	38	+====2) Ground – 90 of policymaking is decided on implementation====
	39	+**Elmore '80** Prof. Public Affairs at University of Washington, 1980 PolySci Quarterly 79-80, p. 605,
	40	+The emergence of implementation as a subject for policy analysis coincides closely with the discovery
	41	+AND
	42	+10 percent, leaving the remaining 90 percent in the realm of implementation.
	43	+
	44	+
	45	+====Policy is uniquely key on this topic====
	46	+**Taebi '11**, Taebi, Behnam. "Ethics of Nuclear Power: How to Understand Sustainability in the Nuclear Debate." NUCLEAR POWER–DEPLOYMENT, OPERATION AND SUSTAINABILITY (2011): 129.TF
	47	+I presented the notion of sustainable development as a moral value and elaborated on its
	48	+AND
	49	+for the present generation. This paper aims to contribute to that awareness.
	50	+
	51	+
	52	+====3) Topic lit – nuclear debate is about specific countries====
	53	+**WNA '15**, June 2015, "The Nuclear Debate," No Publication, http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/the-nuclear-debate.aspx
	54	+Uranium mining and nuclear energy continue to be contentious issues involving both facts and ideology
	55	+AND
	56	+is site-specific rather than about uranium and nuclear energy as such.
	57	+
	58	+
	59	+a) ground
	60	+b) stable advocacy
	61	+c) topic lit
	62	+d) predictibility
	63	+
	64	+====And, there's a topical version of the aff that solves all your offense – just do insert aff here except spec a country====
	65	+
	66	+
	67	+====caselist of lost args====
	68	+
	69	+
	70	+====D. Voter: Education + Fairness ====
	71	+
	72	+
	73	+====drop the debater ====
	74	+
	75	+
	76	+====no RVIs====
	77	+
	78	+
	79	+====competing interpretations====

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-09-22 21:09:11.94

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Presentation AS

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+10

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Gilmour Williams Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2 - SEPOCT T-Resolved

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Yale