Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[9]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[9]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,79 +1,0 @@
1		-====A. Interpretation: The affirmative must specify a specific country or countries that are banning nuclear power. To clarify, they cannot just defend "countries" as a whole====
2		-
3		-
4		-====B. Violation:====
5		-
6		-
7		-====C. Standards:====
8		-
9		-
10		-====1) Textuality – country is defined as government within a specific territory ====
11		-**The Law Dictionary '16** (The Law Dictionary ft. Black's Law Dictionary 2nd edition, copyright 2016, http://thelawdictionary.org/country/~~-~~-ghs//sk)
12		-COUNTRY? The portion of the earth's surface occupied by an independent nation or people
13		-AND
14		-the state, or the government, having possession and dominion over a territory
15		-
16		-
17		-====Resolved implies a policy implemented by a specific legislative instrument====
18		-**Louisiana House '05**, 3-8-2005, http://house.louisiana.gov/house-glossary.htm
19		-Resolution A legislative instrument that generally is used for making declarations, stating policies,
20		-AND
21		-, 13.1 , 6.8 , and 7.4)
22		-
23		-
24		-====Textuality is key to fairness – it's always the most predictable====
25		-**Merrell '15**, Brandon Merrell (Graduate Student, UC San Diego). "Back to Its Roots: Why Topicality Standards Should Assess Definitional Accuracy Rather than Debate Utility." 2015. DRAFT accessed summer 2014. JDN. Updated version available at: http://www.brandonmerrell.com/papers/Merrell20-20Topicality.pdf
26		-Why is it essential to accurately define the resolution? As Brownlee (1981)
27		-AND
28		-topicality must be even more rigorously protected in parli than in other events.
29		-
30		-
31		-====And, textuality prevents judge intervention====
32		-**Diers '10**, Audra R. Diers (Assistant Professor in Organizational Communication and Public Relations at Marist College). "Drawing the Line in the Sand: Re-grounding the Theory and Practice of Topicality Debate." National Forensics Journal, 28(1). Summer 2010. JDN. https://b55eec4b-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/nationalforensicsassociation/research/nfa-journal/vol28no1-2.pdf
33		-The Resolutional Approach. The other primary approach to topicality argumentation articulates a 'truth'
34		-AND
35		-debate as a game, where the resolution only functions to divide ground.
36		-
37		-
38		-====2) Ground – 90 of policymaking is decided on implementation====
39		-**Elmore '80** Prof. Public Affairs at University of Washington, 1980 PolySci Quarterly 79-80, p. 605,
40		-The emergence of implementation as a subject for policy analysis coincides closely with the discovery
41		-AND
42		-10 percent, leaving the remaining 90 percent in the realm of implementation.
43		-
44		-
45		-====Policy is uniquely key on this topic====
46		-**Taebi '11**, Taebi, Behnam. "Ethics of Nuclear Power: How to Understand Sustainability in the Nuclear Debate." NUCLEAR POWER–DEPLOYMENT, OPERATION AND SUSTAINABILITY (2011): 129.TF
47		-I presented the notion of sustainable development as a moral value and elaborated on its
48		-AND
49		-for the present generation. This paper aims to contribute to that awareness.
50		-
51		-
52		-====3) Topic lit – nuclear debate is about specific countries====
53		-**WNA '15**, June 2015, "The Nuclear Debate," No Publication, http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/the-nuclear-debate.aspx
54		-Uranium mining and nuclear energy continue to be contentious issues involving both facts and ideology
55		-AND
56		-is site-specific rather than about uranium and nuclear energy as such.
57		-
58		-
59		-a) ground
60		-b) stable advocacy
61		-c) topic lit
62		-d) predictibility
63		-
64		-====And, there's a topical version of the aff that solves all your offense – just do insert aff here except spec a country====
65		-
66		-
67		-====caselist of lost args====
68		-
69		-
70		-====D. Voter: Education + Fairness ====
71		-
72		-
73		-====drop the debater ====
74		-
75		-
76		-====no RVIs====
77		-
78		-
79		-====competing interpretations====

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-09-22 21:09:11.0

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Presentation AS

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-10

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Gilmour Williams Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2 - SEPOCT T-Resolved

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Yale