Summary

• Objects (2 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[7]
  • Caselist.RoundClass[8]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[7]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[7]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-09-18 04:18:08.595
	1	+2016-09-18 04:18:08.0

Caselist.RoundClass[8]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-09-18 04:19:19.209
	1	+2016-09-18 04:19:19.0

Caselist.CitesClass[7]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,27 @@
	1	+The concept of security is a social construct. Their claims conflict create a false dichotomy between the evil “them” and the good “us” ignoring our role in provoking the aggression. The social context of realist security discourse outweighs Affirmative advantage claims. Grondin David Grondin, Masters in Political Science and Ph.D. Candidate – University of Ottawa, 2004, (“(Re)Writing the ‘National Security State,’ Center for United States Studies, p. 12-17)
	2	+
	3	+Approaches that deconstruct ... state’s very conditions of existence are generated18.
	4	+
	5	+
	6	+Viewing the Middle East as a region that needs help or that has violence spilling out from it has been the paradigm to justify invasion of the region by Western powers and the construction of the enemy Other that must be exterminated. The current security paradigm in regards to the Middle East is based on a top down perspective that ignores how violence uniquely occurs in the region and makes effective solutions impossible- this takes out aff solvency. Bilgin—assistant prof, IR, Bilkent U. PhD, IR, U Wales (Pinar, Whose ‘Middle East’? Geopolitical Inventions and Practices of Security, http://www.arts.yorku.ca/politics/ncanefe/docs/readings20for20the20curious20mind/Pinar20Bilgin20on20Whose20Middle20East.pdf)
	7	+
	8	+The significance of conceiving ... as voiced by myriad non-state actors.
	9	+
	10	+
	11	+Vote negative to reject the AC’s enframing. Intellectual endorsements are key to breaking down dominant paradigms of thought that control policy. My evidence is great on this- it gives multiple empirical examples where speaking out or criticizing dominant paradigms has created tangible changes.Critical intellectualism key to solve the security paradigm—-voting negative outweighs hypothetical plan consequences Jones99—IR, Aberystwyth (Richard, "6. Emancipation: Reconceptualizing Practice," Security, Strategy and Critical Theory, http://www.ciaonet.org/book/wynjones/wynjones06.html, AMiles)
	12	+
	13	+The central political task ... to critical security studies.
	14	+
	15	+
	16	+The judge should concern themselves with being a critical intellectual. This means your job is to question the knowledge claims of the 1AC since they form the baseline of the debate. When a student turns in a awful project, the teacher gives them an F- they don’t make a new project. This means pointing out major issues with the 1AC is enough to vote negative. Our understanding of the world is shaped by our particular discourses- so if your enframing is bad you should lose. JonesLee Jones is lecturer in International Relations at Queen Mary, University of London, BA Honors Univ of Warwick, MA in IR St Anthony’s, PhD IR Nuffield , Journal of Critical Globalization Studies Issue 1 2009
	17	+
	18	+Having conceded where Nye has a ... of State for Security Assistance, Science, and Technology. (p. 127-30)
	19	+
	20	+
	21	+Securitization is a precondition to genocide- their advantage descriptions will be used to justify massive violence. Friss Karsten Friis, UN Sector @ the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, 2k Peace and Conflict Studies 7.2, “From Liminars to Others: Securitization Through Myths,” http://shss.nova.edu/pcs/journalsPDF/V7N2.pdf#page=2
	22	+
	23	+The problem with societal securitization ... where truth is never questioned.
	24	+
	25	+
	26	+Security begins at the level of the speech act – individual constructions of threat scenarios in the debate space are portrayed as real threats accepted and internalized by the audience as relevant. This means by virtue of reading the 1AC you have already started the process of internalization in the audience. Mackenziein ’12: Megan MacKenzie, lecturer of Government and International Relations at the University of Sydney, “Female Soldiers in Sierra Leone: Sex, Security, and Post-Conflict Development”, NYU Press, Aug 27, 2012
	27	+The Copenhagen school’s approach ... that an issue will become securitized.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-09-18 04:19:20.909

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+8

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Dulles Wadhwani Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Security K

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Greenhill