Changes for page Dulles Kurian Neg
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 15 added, 1 removed)
- Caselist.CitesClass[5]
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
- Caselist.CitesClass[15]
- Caselist.CitesClass[16]
- Caselist.CitesClass[17]
- Caselist.CitesClass[18]
- Caselist.CitesClass[19]
- Caselist.CitesClass[20]
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
- Caselist.RoundClass[12]
- Caselist.RoundClass[13]
- Caselist.RoundClass[14]
- Caselist.RoundClass[15]
- Caselist.RoundClass[16]
- Caselist.RoundClass[17]
- Caselist.RoundClass[18]
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,7 +1,0 @@ 1 -interpretation: If the affirmative defends a parametriczed advocacy, then the aff debater must disclose the entirety of their plan text and citations for the plan's topical solvency advocate on the NDCA wiki at least an hour before the round. 2 -Violation: 3 -Standard: Predictability – 4 - 5 -Clash- 6 - 7 -Framework: Theory is competing interps since a) any brightline for reasonability is arbitrary, which forces intervention; only minimization makes sense and b) it fosters a race to the top by promoting proactively better norms for debate. No RVI since a) it strategically disincentives theory to check unfair positions, b) commits the logical fallacy of denying the antecedent, since just because you prove that you're being fair doesn't mean that you win. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-17 18:18:15.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -idr - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -idk - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Dulles Kurian Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JANFEB Disclosure Theory - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -strae
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,12 @@ 1 +interpretation: If the affirmative defends a parametriczed advocacy, then the aff debater must disclose the entirety of their plan text and citations for the plan's topical solvency advocate on the NDCA wiki at least an hour before the round. 2 + 3 +Violation: u did some fckshit prolly 4 + 5 +Standard: 6 + 7 +Predictability – cant predict yo shit ya feel me 8 + 9 +Clash- how deb8 if cant deb8 10 + 11 +No RVI bois 12 +Counter Interps pl0xerino - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-02 21:05:04.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idr - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +11 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Dulles Kurian Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Disclosure Theory - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +strae
- Caselist.CitesClass[15]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,15 @@ 1 +Nietzsche NC 2 +Moral statements are intended to be objective truths but we can never know others objectively, meaning any judgments we make are tainted by our own subjective perspectives. Friedrich NietzscheFriedrich Nietzsche ~German Philosopher~ Human All Too Human. Translated by R.J.Hollingdale. Cambridge University Press. http://archive.org/stream/NietzscheHumanAllTooHuman/Nietzsche-HumanAllTooHuman_djvu.txt. A.S. 3 +Injustice necessary. - All judgements as to the value of life have evolved illogically and are therefore unjust. The falsity of human judgement derives firstly from the condition of the material to be judged, namely very incomplete, secondly from the way in which the sum is arrived at on the basis of this material, and thirdly from the fact that every individual piece of this material is in turn the outcome of false knowledge, and is so with absolute necessity. Our experience of another person, for example, no matter how close he stands to us, can never be complete, so that we would have a logical right to a total evaluation of him; all evaluations are premature and are bound to be. Finally, the standard~s~ by which we measure, our own being, is ~are~ not an unalterable magnitude, we are subject to moods and fluctuations, and yet we would have to know ourselves as a fixed standard to be able justly to assess the relation between ourself and anything else whatever. Perhaps it would follow from all this that one ought not to judge at all; if only it were possible to live without evaluating, without having aversions and partialities! - for all aversion is de- pendent on an evaluation, likewise all partiality. A drive to something or away from something divorced from a feeling one is desiring the beneficial or avoiding the harmful, a drive without some kind of knowing evaluation of the worth of its objective, does not exist in man. We are from the very beginning illogical and thus unjust beings and can recognize this: this is one of the greatest and most irresolvable discords of existence. 4 +An external system of ethics that is detached from the ethical agent makes no sense- if we are the only ones who know ourselves then only we are able to create independent unique obligations. To enforce an obligation upon another we would need to be able to take an outside view, but if we are tainted by subjectivity that becomes impossible. 5 +Therefore, there is no essence to persons. Rather, each agent creates their own ethical norms and identity in relation to themselves. This means that ethical systems must not be focused on creating a certain universal content to impose on all agents- but rather must be amenable to multiple perspectives on what is good and bad. They must accommodate multiple perspectives and modes of being- this is the only way to understand morality. The 1NC recognizes people's role as creators and subjects of morality. As such an ethical action is one in accordance with an individual's subjective evaluation. A denial of that ability to act or be would thus constitute an unethical decision. 6 +Thus the Standard is embracing subject fluidity. 7 +Thus the negative burden is to prove that the process of protecting constitutional free speech denies the agents the ability to define their own obligations and identities. I contend that affirming forces a static notion of identity upon agents. It precludes the possibility of a fluid ontology and denies the ability of agents to act in a way that expresses themselves. 8 +First- constitutional rights require a stable subject on whom we can confer rights on. An agent must be capable of exercising themselves in a particular way to receive the protection of the constitution which would make applications of the law impossible. Furthermore, empirically true- constitution used to say black individuals and women did not possess rights because the document did not recognize them as a subject- which makes your affirmation nonsensical. 9 +Two- rights never addresses the individual but rather a proxy entity that can be objectively evaluated by the system of the law. By removing the personal characteristics that make agents themselves, a codified right forecloses the possibility of recognizing the unique nature of each agent which denies the existential component of ethics. 10 + 11 +Defending the crrent constitution is problematic because it applies a static model of rights 12 +Only 8 justices - can't change 13 +You affirm squo- can't fiat extra changes 14 + 15 +3- Constitution has always affired a static subject, ie rights apply to X type ppl - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-04 19:45:49.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +New age ontology - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Kantian Metaphysics - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +12 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Dulles Kurian Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JF- Nietzsche NC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +IKD
- Caselist.CitesClass[16]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,19 @@ 1 +The 1AC epistemologically and methodologically falls into the trap of linear time- they analyze time as a series of events that independently happened There’s the past, present and the future. What they fail to realize is that the narrative of linear time is a tool used by the state and dominant powers to placate revolution and reinforce the idea that structural violence can be changed by appeals to legislation. The portrayal of the future as something amazing and better that we are constantly working toward is used by structures to rewrite history and over look past oppression, even though oppression exists cyclically and re-interprets itself in new ways. 2 +Stephen Dillon. “It’s here, it’s that time:” Race, queer futurity, and the temporality of violence in Born in Flames. University of Minnesota. Women and Performance: A journal of feminist theory, 2013. 3 + 4 +Progress is named...not let go 5 + 6 +The promise of a future free of imperialism prevents a full confrontation with temporality as accumulation. There is no relief to come in some mystical future. Only understanding violence as accumulation and captivity allows us to understand the existing conditions of violence and come up with solutions. 7 +Stephen Dillon. “It’s here, it’s that time:” Race, queer futurity, and the temporality of violence in Born in Flames. University of Minnesota. Women and Performance: A journal of feminist theory, 2013. 8 + 9 +time not only...to happen again. 10 + 11 +If the future is the accumulated past then the only way to destroy the future is the break the present as we know it. The Alternative is to embrace the incoherence of multiplicity and difference in contrast to the state’s focus on coherence and linear temporality. 12 +Stephen Dillon. “It’s here, it’s that time:” Race, queer futurity, and the temporality of violence in Born in Flames. University of Minnesota. Women and Performance: A journal of feminist theory, 2013. 13 + 14 +The time is...accumulation and capture 15 + 16 +Only the alternative has the capacity to change the way violence operates- certain bodies are denied personhood by definition. Legal reformulations and the state’s demarcations mean that we need a method to articulate subjectivity and personhood outside of the traditional western order. 17 +Weheliye HABEAS VISCUS Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics, and Black Feminist Theories of the Human ALEXANDER G. WEHELIYE Duke University Press Durham and London 2014.p. 48-49 18 + 19 +focus on inclusion...subjugation are administered. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-04 19:47:20.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jacob - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +13 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Dulles Kurian Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JF- Temporality K - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Colleyville
- Caselist.CitesClass[17]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,69 @@ 1 +=Counter-Protest PIC= 2 + 3 + 4 +====Counterplan Text: Public Colleges and Universities in the United States will restrict free speech exclusively for anti-feminist counter-protesters who disparage and harass feminist activists while those feminists are rallying or raising awareness about instances of sexism. 5 + 6 +Competes through mutual exclusivity- we ban anti-feminist speech that occurs during their protests 7 + 8 +Competes through Net Benefits- Winning a reason why the AFF is unnecessary or insufficient is sufficient to negate 9 +==== 10 + 11 + 12 +====When womxn decide to coalesce and fight against patriarchal systems, their greatest opposition comes from reactionary hyper-masculine counter-protesters who insult and verbally attack activists during their marches. The "Roosh" incident proves that these misogynists have no interest in engaging in dialogue and exist solely to oppose activism. Preventing them from interrupting protests allows feminists to articulate their grievances properly. ==== 13 +Brownstone 16'is the solvency advocate 14 +I don't endorse that gendered language b 15 +http://www.thestranger.com/blogs/slog/2016/02/03/23520727/tell-us-what-to-do-with-a-sad-misogynist-who-wants-us-to-pay-attention-to-his-misogyny-and-homophobia 16 +Sydney Brownstone 17 +"Tell us what to do with a sad misogynist who wants us to pay attention to his misogyny and homophobia" 18 +Sydney Brownstone is a Seattle-based former staff writer at Coexist. She lives in a Brooklyn apartment and covers environment, health, and data. She's written for the Village Voice, Mother Jones, Brooklyn Magazine, The L Magazine, and has contributed to NPR. 19 +The Daryush "Roosh" Valizadeh is a homophobe and a misogynist. He runs 20 +AND 21 +the 1AC. 22 + 23 +Counterplan solves the AFF with 3 Net Benefits 24 + 25 + 26 + 27 +====1: Proper agonism. 28 + 29 +When misogynists counter-protest feminist movements, they don't want to engage in dialogue or discussion. The confrontation makes both parties angry and the situation devolves into a scream-fest of insults and swearing. If we make it so that feminists can have their protests, and THEN engage in discourse in the aftermath of their presentation, productive dialogue between individuals can exist because the environment is less hostile. 30 +Wyden ==== 31 +http://oureverydaylife.com/deal-misogynist-17862.html 32 +"How to Deal With a Misogynist" Genevieve Van Wyden 2016 33 +Genevieve Van Wyden began writing in 2007. She has written for "Tu Revista Latina" and owns three blogs. She has worked as a CPS social worker, gaining experience in the mental-health system. Van Wyden earned her Bachelor of Arts in journalism from New Mexico State University in 2006. 34 +This world is made up of all types of people, including men, women 35 +AND 36 +sexist voices AND create zones for discourse in casual environments which prevents hostility. 37 + 38 + 39 +====2: Effective Protest. 40 + 41 +When feminists are able to protest effectively without being hindered by patriarchal interference, they can raise awareness and express opinions on social stigma and prejudice. Protest have been a major part of change in the past and the 1NC is a call to stop silencing them and let the possibilities free flow. ==== 42 +Gallagher 43 +Brenden Gallagher ""The Most Powerful Feminist Protests Against Donald Trump"" 44 +https://www.merryjane.com/culture/most-powerful-feminist-protests-against-donald-trump 45 +October 27, 2016 Brenden Gallagher works in television and writing in Los Angeles. He worked on Revenge, Heartbeat, and Famous in Love. His writing has appeared at Complex, VH1, and MERRY JANE. 46 +Though there has been a lot of negativity swirling around Donald Trump through this election 47 +AND 48 +creating feminist epistemology because I allow protests to go unfettered by masculine hindrance. 49 + 50 + 51 +====3: Critical Reflection. 52 + 53 +The thesis of the 1AC is that womxn are silenced and prevented from speaking. My advocacy makes it so that anti-feminists who want to counter-protest are silenced and prevented from speaking which forces them to understand and undergo the process of having their speech devalued. The 1NC makes THEM understand how YOU feel, which allows for critical reflection and makes real change possible. 54 +Marsden 55 +Harriet Marsden 56 +http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/feminism-straight-white-men-didnt-ask-to-be-born-silenced-by-feminazi-meanies-guardian-article-a7227021.html 57 +"I feel for the straight white men who are being silenced by the mean girls of modern feminism" 58 +Harriet Marsden is a freelance journalist talking world culture, politics and lifestyle, often through the form of critical analysis and parody. She is an author for The Independent and specializes in feminism and gender discourse. 59 + 60 +You would be forgiven for mistaking it for a Daily Mash headline – but no, it's real. The Guardian has published a piece today under the headline "'I didn't choose to be straight, white and male': are modern men the suffering sex?" The premise of the article is that men are feeling "silenced" by the spectre of gender equality. As I walk down the halls of hallowed institutions admiring the rows of (white male) portraits of former leaders, and I watch our Prime Minister (only the second female in a long line of white males) attempt to shout over her cabinet of predominantly white male MPs, I have to remind myself how silenced white men are. The press, the politicians, the police, the powerful…notwithstanding the undeniable fact that these are all still predominantly male, and white straight males at that, men are feeling silenced. Forget about the billions of women worldwide who are literally silenced by patriarchal oppression, poverty, racial inequality, and femicide. No, the silencing of men in the western world is now the social issue du jour. And we know this because they're complaining and being interviewed about it. Apparently, a "well-educated, professionally successful and mostly very progressive male friend" (you have to enjoy that qualifying "mostly") sent Guardian journalist Rose Hackman a video of women beating up men, presumably to make the point that feminism is running rampant with its violence and its misandry and its general advocating of beating men to a pulp. Forget the estimated two women dying every week in the UK as a result of domestic violence, or how violence against women has been the norm in pretty much every culture in the entire world at some point. Forget that. Hey, look at this YouTube video! According to this mostly progressive male, women are "having their cake and eating it too", profiting from an unfair double standard and "getting away with stuff men never would". Like sexual assault? Like mass shootings? Like war crimes? Like terrorist attacks? Like human trafficking? Forget the statistics which show how disproportionate the gender divide of these crimes is. Apparently, women are committing these atrocities just as much as men – but they're getting away with it. Political correctness gone mad! Apparently, the "increasingly equal society has made men the suffering sex", and there's no denying "the consistency, and therefore validity, of the feelings being ~~expressed~~." I had no idea that if a feeling is consistent, it must be valid. Thousands of racists rejoice – your feelings are now "valid". I have a bit of a problem with the microphone "being handed over" to men for their views on how women becoming seen as real and equal humans might be negatively affecting them. But then again, women have had the monopoly on public discourse since language was invented. Women have had the podium for long enough – decades, in fact. That's more than enough time. We should actually hand the microphone back to men. According to Michael Kimmel, executive director of the Centre for the Study of Men and Masculinities (imagine their mailing list) the world used to be "our locker room" where men could say what they wanted. "Now a lot of guys have to watch what they say. That's got to be hard." It is, Mr Kimmel! Wouldn't it be excellent if we could all shout about our burning cystitis every time the bus goes over a bump? Wouldn't you love to finally admit to your co-worker that their voice you want to stab yourself in the face? Watching what we say is so hard! The Guardian article provides a selection of male voices to wax lyrical on how silenced they are, men chosen for "a lack of overt disrespect towards women" – that's a category you don't want to lose in. Highlights include Tom, a butcher from Seattle, who howls: "We talk about accepting people – that someone didn't choose to be trans, or gay…I didn't choose to be straight, white and male." Because of course, you can equate the political struggles, emotional trauma, hate crimes, prejudice, under-representation, imprisonment and murders of the global gay or trans communities with the frustrations of a white male butcher. So to all you over-privileged, economically advantaged and socially unpersecuted white cisgendered males out there, I say this: I'm sorry you're suffering. I'm sorry you didn't choose to be born who you are. I didn't choose to be born into a racially segregated patriarchy where menstruation and childbirth render me intolerant of your suffering, and where I'm statistically more likely to be raped, murdered or discriminated against than you. But we all have our crosses to bear.==== 61 + 62 + 63 +====Outweighs in terms of strength into your role of the ballot- My praxis allows both womxn and mxn to learn from politics of exclusion and inclusion which means my education method can make real change a possibility between both groups 64 +==== 65 + 66 + 67 +====Puts terminal defense on the 1AC- your method can never hope to achieve change because it is perceived by men to just be women getting mad at them for actions that have been implanted in them as normal. The CP resolves this because it makes misogynists deal with the reality of being silenced and makes it possible for them to come to the conclusion it is universally bad to be unheard 68 + 69 +==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-04 19:51:00.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +ikd - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Marcus - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +14 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Dulles Kurian Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JF- Counter-Protest CP - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Colleyville
- Caselist.CitesClass[18]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,55 @@ 1 +==1NC (4:30)== 2 + 3 + 4 +====The 1ac's celebration of agonistic democracy is grossly inadequate to theorize the singularity of antiblackness.. Democracy is not benign, but rather an extension of civil society that is used to legitimize anti-black violence==== 5 +**Sexton and Lee 06** ~~Jared Sexton, African American Studies Program, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA, Elizabeth Lee, Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, "Figuring the Prison: Prerequisites of Torture at Abu Ghraib", Editorial Board of Antipode, page 1013-1014~~//MHELLIE 6 +The rituals of torture exposed at Abu Ghraib—staged events both reckless and deliberate 7 +AND 8 +the so-called post-civil rights era) (Nast 2000). 9 + 10 + 11 +====The logic of communication presumes personhood, a subject position inaccessible by the slave. Instead, the vocality of the slave is one of pupethood, fulfilling civil society's desire for legitimized violence against black bodies. Black speech always equals asking for it in a society defined by anti-blackness. ==== 12 +Brady 12. 2012. Nicholas. "Louder Than the Dark: Toward an Acoustics of Suffering", http://www.thefeministwire.com/2012/10/louder-than-the-dark-towards-an-acoustics-of-suffering/. ~~Edited for Ableist Language~~. AKB 13 +Discourse on race normally focuses on the material and the visual, but the video 14 +AND 15 +an impossible scream to be heard from the depths of incarceration and incapacity. 16 + 17 + 18 +====1AC dreams up their imaginary paradise of a free speech that only applies to white bodies. Speech is never free when it's within the confines of the constitution because it was made at the literally exclusion of black bodies==== 19 +**Farley 05** ~~Anthony Paul (Associate Professor, Boston College Law School) "Perfecting Slavery", Loyola University Chicago Law Journal. Vol, 36. p101-131. AKB~~ 20 +In 1995, Missouri v. Jenkins ended the saga.79 With Missouri v 21 +AND 22 +slaves are themselves the evidence of the eternal truth of their master's mastery. 23 + 24 + 25 +====Their politics of hope ignores this foundational truth – that the slave is always outside of the frame of redeemability – and instead creates an imaginary future to keep the slave at bay, always promising something greater. ==== 26 +**Warren 15** ~~Calvin K., Assistant Professor of American Studies at George Washington University, "Black Nihilism and the Politics of Hope," CR: The New Centennial Review, Volume 15, Number 1, Spring 2015~~ 27 +The politics of hope, then, constitutes what Lauren Berlant would call "cruel 28 +AND 29 +the only "hope" for blackness in an anti-black world. 30 + 31 + 32 +====Civil Society is produced through gratuitous anti-black violence – The coherence of civil society relies on a prior ontological exclusion of black bodies. ==== 33 +**Wilderson 1** ~~Wilderson, African American Studies and Drama and UC-Irvine, fought in Anti-Apartheid struggle in South Africa, 2009. Red, White, and Black: Cinema and the Structure of U.S. Antagonisms, intro~~ 34 +I have little interest in assailing political conservatives. Nor is my argument wedded to 35 +AND 36 +split occur? The woman at the gates of Columbia University awaits an answer 37 + 38 + 39 +====Vote negative – freedom is an illusion created by the shackles of civil society. It is your obligation as the judge to throw away the 1AC. 40 +**Farley 5 **– Boston College (Anthony, "Perfecting Slavery", http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028andcontext=lsfp) *edited for gendered language 41 +What is to be done? Two hundred years ago, when the slaves in Haiti rose up, they, of necessity, burned everything: They burned San Domingo flat so that at the end of the war it was a charred desert. Why do you burn everything? asked a French officer of a prisoner. We have a right to burn what we cultivate because a~~person~~ man has a right to dispose of his own labour, was the reply of this unknown anarchist. 48 The slaves burned everything because everything was against them. Everything was against the slaves, the entire order that it was their lot to follow, the entire order in which they were positioned as worse than senseless things, every plantation, everything. 49 "Leave nothing white behind you," said Toussaint to those dedicated to the end of white-overblack. 50 "God gave Noah the rainbow sign. No more water, the fire next time." 51 The slaves burned everything, yes, but, unfortunately, they only burned everything in Haiti. 52 Theirs was the greatest and most successful revolution in the history of the world but the failure of their fire to cross the waters was the great tragedy of the nineteenth century. 53 At the dawn of the twentieth century, W.E.B. Du Bois wrote, "The colorline belts the world." 54 Du Bois said that the problem of the twentieth century was the problem of the colorline. 55 The problem, now, at the dawn of the twenty-first century is the problem of the colorline. The colorline continues to belt the world. Indeed, the slave power that is the United States now threatens an entire world with the death that it has become and so the slaves of yesterday, today, and tomorrow, those with nothing but their chains to lose, must, if they would be free, if they would escape slavery, win the entire world. We begin as children. We are called and we become our response to the call. Slaves are not called. What becomes of them? What becomes of the broken-hearted? The slaves are divided souls, they are brokenhearted, the slaves are split asunder by what they are called upon to become. The slaves are called upon to become objects but objecthood is not a calling. The slave, then, during its loneliest loneliness, is divided from itself. This is schizophrenia. The slaves are not called, or, rather, the slaves are called to not be. The slaves are called unfree but this the living can never be and so the slaves burst apart and die. The slaves begin as death, not as children, and death is not a beginning but an end. There is no progress and no exit from the undiscovered country of the slave, or so it seems. We are trained to think through a progress narrative, a grand narrative, the grandest narrative, that takes us up from slavery. There is no up from slavery. The progress from slavery to the end of history is the progress from white-over-black to white-over-black to white-over-black. The progress of slavery runs in the opposite direction of the past-present-future timeline. The slave only becomes the perfect slave at the end of the timeline, only under conditions of total juridical freedom. It is only under conditions of freedom, of bourgeois legality, that the slave can perfect itself as a slave by freely choosing to bow down before its master. The slave perfects itself as a slave by offering a prayer for equal rights. The system of marks is a plantation. The system of property is a plantation. The system of law is a plantation. These plantations, all part of the same system, hierarchy, produce white-overblack, white-over-black only, and that continually. The slave perfects itself as a slave through its prayers for equal rights. The plantation system will not commit suicide and the slave, as stated above, has knowing non-knowledge of this fact. The slave finds its way back from the undiscovered country only by burning down every plantation. When the slave prays for equal rights it makes the free choice to be dead, and it makes the free choice to not be. Education is the call. We are called to be and then we become something. We become that which we make of ourselves. We follow the call, we pursue a calling. Freedom is the only calling—it alone contains all possible directions, all of the choices that may later blossom into the fullness of our lives. We can only be free. Slavery is death. How do slaves die? Slaves are not born, they are made. The slave must be trained to be that which the living cannot be. The only thing that the living are not free to be is dead. The slave must be trained to follow the call that is not a call. The slave must be trained to pursue the calling that is not a calling. The slave must be trained to objecthood. The slave must become death. Slavery is white-over-black. White-over-black is death. White-over-black, death, then, is what the slave must become to pursue its calling that is not a calling. ==== 42 + 43 + 44 +====Thus the ROB is to vote for the debater that has the best method to deconstruct antiblackness. That's comes first, antiblackness scandalizes ethicality and sets the stage for all violence==== 45 +**Wilderson 2***Bracketed for Gendered Language***** He is one of two Americans to hold elected office in the African National Co ngress and is a former insurgent in the ANC's armed wing, He is a full professor of Drama and African American studies at the University of California, Irvine. He received his BA in government and philosophy from Dartmouth College, his Masters in Fine Arts from Columbia University and his PhD in Rhetoric and Film Studies from the University of California, Berkeley. (Frank B. III "Chapter One: The Ruse of Analogy" Red, White, and Black: Cinema and the Structure of U.S. Antagonisms,) 2008 46 +Two tensions are at work here. One operates under the labor of ethical dilemmas 47 +AND 48 +(110) or, more precisely, in the eyes of Humanity. 49 + 50 + 51 +**====We embrace the concept of "revolutionary suicide" to redefine the impact calculus to evaluate the debate – the role of the judge is a revolutionary in the constant struggle of liberation for oppressed groups – this requires an embracement of the possibility of death to achieve the best hope for radical social change====** 52 +**Newton 73 **(Huey P. Newton is a co-founder of the Black Panther Party For Self-Defense, PhD @ University of California, Santa Cruz, Revolutionary Suicide, Penguin Edition with Introduction written by Frederika Newton 2009, pg. 2-6) 53 +To understand revolutionary suicide it is first necessary to have an idea of reactionary suicide 54 +AND 55 +a feather; to die for the revolution is heavier than Mount Tai. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-07 08:26:10.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +LawZaoh - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Michael Gao - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +15 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Octas - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Dulles Kurian Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JF- Wilderson K - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Colleyville
- Caselist.CitesClass[19]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,38 @@ 1 +Bet ya didnt see this one comin, logan ;) 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 +=CEDA TW PIC= 6 + 7 + 8 +====Cp-Text- the framers of the cross examination debate association in debate rounds within public colleges and universities should not restrict any speech protected by the current Cross Examination Debate except when a trigger warning is read and the anyone in the room says that they could potentially be triggered==== 9 +====Lindsay Holmes is the solvency advocate==== 10 + 11 + 12 +====Trigger warnings still ALLOW FOR debate ==== 13 +Lindsay Holmes 08/26/2016 Deputy Healthy Living Editor, The Huffington Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/university-of-chicago-trigger-warning_us_57bf16d9e4b085c1ff28176d 14 +The University of Chicago sent a welcome letter to incoming freshmen, posted online Wednesday 15 +AND 16 +someone should have to listen to someone who questions their humanity or experience. 17 + 18 + 19 +====Showing Disrepect for trigger warnings isolate those suffering from mental health disorders and alienates them==== 20 + 21 + 22 +====Holmes 2==== 23 +Lindsay Holmes 08/26/2016 Deputy Healthy Living Editor, The Huffington Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/university-of-chicago-trigger-warning_us_57bf16d9e4b085c1ff28176d 24 +This kind of insensitive rhetoric also implies that mental health issues or traumatic pasts ― 25 +AND 26 +a warning that issues of support will be on0 the university's terms only. 27 + 28 + 29 +====A DISREGARD FOR TRIGGER WARNINGS IS A DISREGARD FOR PEOPLE – these safe spaces are necessary for dissipating anxieties and creating spaces for ACTUAL DISCUSSION. Pickett 16==== 30 +Reann Pickett ~~~~ TIME "Trigger Warnings and Safe Spaces are Necessary" 8/31/2016 Pickett is senior director of communications and public Affairs at the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health and a Ms. Foundation Public Voices Fellows here are the author credentials i couldn't find them until now 31 +i love you go kill it message 32 +After the birth of my first son 33 +AND 34 +should be at the vanguard of modeling the way forward—not backward. 35 + 36 + 37 +==Competition== 38 +Competes through mutual exclusivity, your advocacy says that we follow the CEDA constitution, the constitution claims to not restrict debate unless they are listed as exceptions, no mention of trigger warnings are made within the 2016 version of the constitution which means that the CP and AC advocacy are mutually exclusive. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-07 08:30:06.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Zhao, Wright, Daksh - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +North Crowley LR - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +16 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Semis - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Dulles Kurian Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JF- CEDA Trigger Warnings PIC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Colleyville
- Caselist.CitesClass[20]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,56 @@ 1 +=Wynter K= 2 + 3 + 4 +====There is no hope to deal with the question of "humanity," the potential of what "humans" should be, should think, and how they should act based on these stances within the anthropology of white European models of thought. Regardless of the "critique," the white call to action allows Europe the continued power to construct "MAN," within their own systems of thought. Their position is just another example of a moral plea to white decadent anthropology – you search for truth through dialogue, but it is white truth and excludes other cultures – knowledge isn't neutral but has meaning==== 5 +**Wynter 06**, Syliva Wynter—2006 ( "Interview with Syliva Wynter,ProudFlesh Interview: New Afrikan Journal of Culture, Politics and Consciousness, Issue 4) 6 +PROUD FLESH: At this point in your life's work, who could think of 7 +AND 8 +-sociogeny, there's no problem. Do you see what I mean? 9 + 10 + 11 +====The courts created an arbitrary distinction between acts and words that allows the state to implicitly allow and support white domination – this is a fundamental flaw in the system. They conveniently abstract from real world structural inequalities ==== 12 +**National Center for Human Rights Education 11 **~~opened its doors and joined 21 other countries which launched human rights education projects as part of the United Nations Decade for Human Rights Education, "First Amendment and Racial Terrorism", 2011, University of Dayton, http://academic.udayton.edu/race/06hrights/waronterrorism/racial02.htm~~ 13 +Racists in the United States have always been able to cloak their ideas in the 14 +AND 15 +a cross to intimidate a black family was equivalent to freedom of speech. 16 + 17 + 18 +====The affirmatives deliberations are ones controlled by the potentiality of whiteness. They assume that the university and state, historically racist institutions, will just change their mind. The problem is that assumes that white power structures will let that happen and not rise again to maintain the squo. We need to strip optimism and give up hope in these institutions. What you fail to realize is that you don't open up black liberatory speech but just unlock the creative potential for white speech – it is this imaginative thought that destroys the ability for the black thinker to fight oppression. Curry 13:==== 19 +Curry, Tommy J. ~~doctor in Associate Professor of Philosophy, Affiliated Professor of Africana Studies, Texas A and M University~~ In the Fiat of Dreams: The Delusional Allure of Hope, the Reality of Anti-Black Violence and the Demands of the Anti-Ethical. 2013. SPHS//SS 20 +Ought implies a projected (futural) act. The word commands a deliberate action 21 +AND 22 +what possibility the world allows Blacks to contemplate under the idea of ethics. 23 + 24 + 25 +====The conception of the state is Eurocentric – you cannot use the state to fight the European conception of man==== 26 +Quijano 2000 27 +(Anibal, a Peruvian sociologist and humanist thinker, known for having developed the concept of "coloniality of power". His body of work has been influential in the fields of post-colonial studies and critical theory, 2000, "Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America," P. 558, www.unc.edu/~~aescobar/wan/wanquijano.pdf) 28 +The Nation-State One of the clearest examples of this tragedy of equivocations in 29 +AND 30 +sense, necessarily a space of domination disputed and victoriously guarded against rivals. 31 + 32 + 33 +====Racism is the anthropological cause of colonial differences in the world order – it comprises the template of modernity used to refuse humanity to other people. 34 + 35 +Vote negative to endorse a black counter-anthropology through an intellectual grassroots movement.==== 36 +**Wynter 03**, Sylvia Wynter—2003 ("Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, After Man, Its Overrepresentation—An Argument," CR: The New Centennial Review, Volume 3, Number 3,257-337) 37 +The argument proposes that the struggle of our new millennium will be one between the 38 +AND 39 +with the separation of huma and natural I say it starte w black exclu 40 + 41 + 42 +=On Case= 43 + 44 + 45 +====OV: If everything was always fluid then nothing would ever make sense and even self-referential statements like I ought to do x would be incoherent because there would be no I. We should recognize difference is important and that affective relations shape our subjectivities but that does not mean throwing away all coherence. Rather we can create different identities from a starting point- that allows us to make sense of difference and use it in productive ways as opposed to getting lost in it. If there is no reason why a stable basis for subjecthood is problematic all the time, you vote neg.==== 46 + 47 + 48 +====We need to understand the intricacies of explicit policies, the operations of the state, and the way that farm culture pervades and forces expectations on individuals- this hijanks your assemblage arguments- identity is merely one part of the map of interactions- we need to understand the position of all subjects and events in order to understand how certain identities are created as majoritarian or minoritarian- this entails mapping out relations between all parties, deconstructing how those event spaces occur, and then creating lines of flight 49 +Bryant (9/15, Levi, professor of Philosophy at Collin College and Chair of the Critical Philosophy program at the New Centre for Research and Practice, "War Machines and Military Logistics: Some Cards on the Table," https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2012/09/15/war-machines-and-military-logistics-some-cards-on-the-table/)==== 50 + 51 + 52 +====We need answers to these questions to intervene effectively. We can call them questions of "military logistics". We are, after all, constructing war machines to combat these intolerable conditions. Military logistics asks two questions: first, it asks what things the opposing force, the opposing war machine captured by the state apparatus, relies on in order to deploy its war machine: supply lines, communications networks, people willing to fight, propaganda or ideology, people believing in the cause, etc. Military logistics maps all of these things. Second, military logistics asks how to best deploy its own resources in fighting that state war machine. In what way should we deploy our war machine to defeat war machines like racism, sexism, capitalism, neoliberalism, etc? What are the things upon which these state based war machines are based, what are the privileged nodes within these state based war machines that allows them to function? These nodes are the things upon which we want our nomadic war machines to intervene. If we are to be effective in producing change we better know what the supply lines are so that we might make them our target. What I've heard in these discussions is a complete indifference to military logistics. It's as if people like to wave their hands and say "this is horrible and unjust!" and believe that hand waving is a politically efficacious act. Yeah, you're right, it is horrible but saying so doesn't go very far and changing it. It's also as if people are horrified when anyone discusses anything besides how horribly unjust everything is. Confronted with an analysis why the social functions in the horrible way, the next response is to say "you're justifying that system and saying it's a-okay!" This misses the point that the entire point is to map the "supply lines" of the opposing war machine so you can strategically intervene in them to destroy them and create alternative forms of life. You see, we already took for granted your analysis of how horrible things are. You're preaching to the choir. We wanted to get to work determining how to change that and believed for that we needed good maps of the opposing state based war machine so we can decide how to intervene. We then look at your actual practices and see that your sole strategy seems to be ideological critique or debunking. Your idea seems to be that if you just prove that other people's beliefs are incoherent, they'll change and things will be different. But we've noticed a couple things about your strategy: 1) there have been a number of bang-on critiques of state based war machines, without things changing too much, and 2) we've noticed that we might even persuade others that labor under these ideologies that their position is incoherent, yet they still adhere to it as if the grounds of their ideology didn't matter much. This leads us to suspect that there are other causal factors that undergird these social assemblages and cause them to endure is they do. We thought to ourselves, there are two reasons that an ideological critique can be successful and still fail to produce change: a) the problem can be one of "distribution". The critique is right but fails to reach the people who need to hear it and even if they did receive the message they couldn't receive it because it's expressed in the foreign language of "academese" which they've never been substantially exposed to (academics seem to enjoy only speaking to other academics even as they say their aim is to change the world). Or b) there are other causal factors involved in why social worlds take the form they do that are not of the discursive, propositional, or semiotic order. My view is that it is a combination of both. I don't deny that ideology is one component of why societies take the form they do and why people tolerate intolerable conditions. I merely deny that this is the only causal factor. I don't reject your political aims, but merely wonder how to get there. Meanwhile, you guys behave like a war machine that believes it's sufficient to drop pamphlets out of an airplane debunking the ideological reasons that persuade the opposing force's soldiers to fight this war on behalf of the state apparatus, forgetting supply lines, that there are other soldiers behind them with guns to their back, that they have obligations to their fellows, that they have families to feed or debt to pay off, etc. When I point out these other things it's not to reject your political aims, but to say that perhaps these are also good things to intervene in if we wish to change the world. In other words, I'm objecting to your tendency to use a hammer to solve all problems and to see all things as a nail (discursive problems), ignoring the role that material nonhuman entities play in the form that social assemblages take. This is the basic idea behind what I've called "terraism". Terraism has three components: 1) "Cartography" or the mapping of assemblages to understand why they take the form they take and why they endure. This includes the mapping of both semiotic and material components of social assemblages. 2) "Deconstruction" Deconstruction is a practice. It includes both traditional modes of discursive deconstruction (Derridean deconstruction, post-structuralist feminist critique, Foucaultian genealogy, Cultural Marxist critique, etc), but also far more literal deconstruction in the sense of intervening in material or thingly orders upon which social assemblages are reliant. It is not simply beliefs, signs, and ideologies that cause oppressive social orders to endure or persist, but also material arrangements upon which people depend to live as they do. Part of changing a social order thus necessarily involves intervening in those material networks to undermine their ability to maintain their relations or feedback mechanisms that allow them to perpetuate certain dependencies for people. Finally, 3) there is "Terraformation". Terraformation is the hardest thing of all, as it requires the activist to be something more than a critic, something more than someone who simply denounces how bad things are, someone more than someone who simply sneers, producing instead other material and semiotic arrangements rendering new forms of life and social relation possible. Terraformation consists in building alternative forms of life. None of this, however, is possible without good mapping of the terrain so as to know what to deconstruct and what resources are available for building new worlds. Sure, I care about ontology for political reasons because I believe this world sucks and is profoundly unjust. But rather than waving my hands and cursing because of how unjust and horrible it is so as to feel superior to all those about me who don't agree, rather than playing the part of the beautiful soul who refuses to get his hands dirty, I think we need good maps so we can blow up the right bridges, power lines, and communications networks, and so we can engage in effective terraformation.==== 53 +This is also terminal defense on your alternative- individuals don't understand incoherence-ergo why it is incoherent- it means your pedagogy is useless to the subjects it's meant to actually help- there's a reason antihumanism has always failed in the real world- because it's articulated in unhelpful ways. Recognizing humanism as historically contingent allows us to articulate harms in an understandable while also avoiding the pitfalls of your criticism. Lester 12 – (January 2012, Alan, Director of Interdisciplinary Research, Professor of Historical Geography, and Co-Director of the Colonial and Postcolonial Studies Network, University of Sussex, "Humanism, race and the colonial frontier," Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Volume 37, Issue 1, pages 132–148) 54 +I fear, however, that if we direct attention away from histories of humanism's 55 +AND 56 +to reveal themselves- this means I solve 100 of your impacts. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-18 16:48:25.719 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk some loser i think maddy stevens ha lame - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Evanston GH - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +18 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Dulles Kurian Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JF- Wynter K - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +13 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-02 21:05:03.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idr - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +fa - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +strae
- Caselist.RoundClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +15 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-04 19:45:47.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +New age ontology - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Kantian Metaphysics - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +IKD
- Caselist.RoundClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +16 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-04 19:47:17.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jacob - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +knnk - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Colleyville
- Caselist.RoundClass[14]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +17 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-04 19:50:51.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +ikd - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Marcus - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +jnk - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Colleyville
- Caselist.RoundClass[15]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +18 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-07 08:26:08.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +LawZaoh - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Michael Gao - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Octas - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Agonism more like agony to the black body amirite boys - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Colleyville
- Caselist.RoundClass[16]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +19 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-07 08:30:03.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Zhao, Wright, Daksh - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +North Crowley LR - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Semis - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2-1 bec Daksh thought i was a dick lmao - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Colleyville
- Caselist.RoundClass[17]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-18 16:46:42.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk some loser P it was Maddy Stevens - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Evanston GH - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +farming is racist - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard
- Caselist.RoundClass[18]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-18 16:48:23.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk some loser i think maddy stevens ha lame - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Evanston GH - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +farming is racist - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Harvard