Changes for page Dulles Kurian Neg
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 8 added, 1 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,7 +1,0 @@ 1 -interpretation: If the affirmative defends a parametriczed advocacy, then the aff debater must disclose the entirety of their plan text and citations for the plan's topical solvency advocate on the NDCA wiki at least an hour before the round. 2 -Violation: 3 -Standard: Predictability – 4 - 5 -Clash- 6 - 7 -Framework: Theory is competing interps since a) any brightline for reasonability is arbitrary, which forces intervention; only minimization makes sense and b) it fosters a race to the top by promoting proactively better norms for debate. No RVI since a) it strategically disincentives theory to check unfair positions, b) commits the logical fallacy of denying the antecedent, since just because you prove that you're being fair doesn't mean that you win. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-17 18:18:15.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -idr - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -idk - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Dulles Kurian Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JANFEB Disclosure Theory - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -strae
- Caselist.CitesClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,12 @@ 1 +interpretation: If the affirmative defends a parametriczed advocacy, then the aff debater must disclose the entirety of their plan text and citations for the plan's topical solvency advocate on the NDCA wiki at least an hour before the round. 2 + 3 +Violation: u did some fckshit prolly 4 + 5 +Standard: 6 + 7 +Predictability – cant predict yo shit ya feel me 8 + 9 +Clash- how deb8 if cant deb8 10 + 11 +No RVI bois 12 +Counter Interps pl0xerino - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-02 21:05:04.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idr - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +11 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Dulles Kurian Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Disclosure Theory - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +strae
- Caselist.CitesClass[15]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,15 @@ 1 +Nietzsche NC 2 +Moral statements are intended to be objective truths but we can never know others objectively, meaning any judgments we make are tainted by our own subjective perspectives. Friedrich NietzscheFriedrich Nietzsche ~German Philosopher~ Human All Too Human. Translated by R.J.Hollingdale. Cambridge University Press. http://archive.org/stream/NietzscheHumanAllTooHuman/Nietzsche-HumanAllTooHuman_djvu.txt. A.S. 3 +Injustice necessary. - All judgements as to the value of life have evolved illogically and are therefore unjust. The falsity of human judgement derives firstly from the condition of the material to be judged, namely very incomplete, secondly from the way in which the sum is arrived at on the basis of this material, and thirdly from the fact that every individual piece of this material is in turn the outcome of false knowledge, and is so with absolute necessity. Our experience of another person, for example, no matter how close he stands to us, can never be complete, so that we would have a logical right to a total evaluation of him; all evaluations are premature and are bound to be. Finally, the standard~s~ by which we measure, our own being, is ~are~ not an unalterable magnitude, we are subject to moods and fluctuations, and yet we would have to know ourselves as a fixed standard to be able justly to assess the relation between ourself and anything else whatever. Perhaps it would follow from all this that one ought not to judge at all; if only it were possible to live without evaluating, without having aversions and partialities! - for all aversion is de- pendent on an evaluation, likewise all partiality. A drive to something or away from something divorced from a feeling one is desiring the beneficial or avoiding the harmful, a drive without some kind of knowing evaluation of the worth of its objective, does not exist in man. We are from the very beginning illogical and thus unjust beings and can recognize this: this is one of the greatest and most irresolvable discords of existence. 4 +An external system of ethics that is detached from the ethical agent makes no sense- if we are the only ones who know ourselves then only we are able to create independent unique obligations. To enforce an obligation upon another we would need to be able to take an outside view, but if we are tainted by subjectivity that becomes impossible. 5 +Therefore, there is no essence to persons. Rather, each agent creates their own ethical norms and identity in relation to themselves. This means that ethical systems must not be focused on creating a certain universal content to impose on all agents- but rather must be amenable to multiple perspectives on what is good and bad. They must accommodate multiple perspectives and modes of being- this is the only way to understand morality. The 1NC recognizes people's role as creators and subjects of morality. As such an ethical action is one in accordance with an individual's subjective evaluation. A denial of that ability to act or be would thus constitute an unethical decision. 6 +Thus the Standard is embracing subject fluidity. 7 +Thus the negative burden is to prove that the process of protecting constitutional free speech denies the agents the ability to define their own obligations and identities. I contend that affirming forces a static notion of identity upon agents. It precludes the possibility of a fluid ontology and denies the ability of agents to act in a way that expresses themselves. 8 +First- constitutional rights require a stable subject on whom we can confer rights on. An agent must be capable of exercising themselves in a particular way to receive the protection of the constitution which would make applications of the law impossible. Furthermore, empirically true- constitution used to say black individuals and women did not possess rights because the document did not recognize them as a subject- which makes your affirmation nonsensical. 9 +Two- rights never addresses the individual but rather a proxy entity that can be objectively evaluated by the system of the law. By removing the personal characteristics that make agents themselves, a codified right forecloses the possibility of recognizing the unique nature of each agent which denies the existential component of ethics. 10 + 11 +Defending the crrent constitution is problematic because it applies a static model of rights 12 +Only 8 justices - can't change 13 +You affirm squo- can't fiat extra changes 14 + 15 +3- Constitution has always affired a static subject, ie rights apply to X type ppl - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-04 19:45:49.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +New age ontology - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Kantian Metaphysics - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +12 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Dulles Kurian Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JF- Nietzsche NC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +IKD
- Caselist.CitesClass[16]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,19 @@ 1 +The 1AC epistemologically and methodologically falls into the trap of linear time- they analyze time as a series of events that independently happened There’s the past, present and the future. What they fail to realize is that the narrative of linear time is a tool used by the state and dominant powers to placate revolution and reinforce the idea that structural violence can be changed by appeals to legislation. The portrayal of the future as something amazing and better that we are constantly working toward is used by structures to rewrite history and over look past oppression, even though oppression exists cyclically and re-interprets itself in new ways. 2 +Stephen Dillon. “It’s here, it’s that time:” Race, queer futurity, and the temporality of violence in Born in Flames. University of Minnesota. Women and Performance: A journal of feminist theory, 2013. 3 + 4 +Progress is named...not let go 5 + 6 +The promise of a future free of imperialism prevents a full confrontation with temporality as accumulation. There is no relief to come in some mystical future. Only understanding violence as accumulation and captivity allows us to understand the existing conditions of violence and come up with solutions. 7 +Stephen Dillon. “It’s here, it’s that time:” Race, queer futurity, and the temporality of violence in Born in Flames. University of Minnesota. Women and Performance: A journal of feminist theory, 2013. 8 + 9 +time not only...to happen again. 10 + 11 +If the future is the accumulated past then the only way to destroy the future is the break the present as we know it. The Alternative is to embrace the incoherence of multiplicity and difference in contrast to the state’s focus on coherence and linear temporality. 12 +Stephen Dillon. “It’s here, it’s that time:” Race, queer futurity, and the temporality of violence in Born in Flames. University of Minnesota. Women and Performance: A journal of feminist theory, 2013. 13 + 14 +The time is...accumulation and capture 15 + 16 +Only the alternative has the capacity to change the way violence operates- certain bodies are denied personhood by definition. Legal reformulations and the state’s demarcations mean that we need a method to articulate subjectivity and personhood outside of the traditional western order. 17 +Weheliye HABEAS VISCUS Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics, and Black Feminist Theories of the Human ALEXANDER G. WEHELIYE Duke University Press Durham and London 2014.p. 48-49 18 + 19 +focus on inclusion...subjugation are administered. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-04 19:47:20.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jacob - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +13 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Dulles Kurian Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JF- Temporality K - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Colleyville
- Caselist.CitesClass[17]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,69 @@ 1 +=Counter-Protest PIC= 2 + 3 + 4 +====Counterplan Text: Public Colleges and Universities in the United States will restrict free speech exclusively for anti-feminist counter-protesters who disparage and harass feminist activists while those feminists are rallying or raising awareness about instances of sexism. 5 + 6 +Competes through mutual exclusivity- we ban anti-feminist speech that occurs during their protests 7 + 8 +Competes through Net Benefits- Winning a reason why the AFF is unnecessary or insufficient is sufficient to negate 9 +==== 10 + 11 + 12 +====When womxn decide to coalesce and fight against patriarchal systems, their greatest opposition comes from reactionary hyper-masculine counter-protesters who insult and verbally attack activists during their marches. The "Roosh" incident proves that these misogynists have no interest in engaging in dialogue and exist solely to oppose activism. Preventing them from interrupting protests allows feminists to articulate their grievances properly. ==== 13 +Brownstone 16'is the solvency advocate 14 +I don't endorse that gendered language b 15 +http://www.thestranger.com/blogs/slog/2016/02/03/23520727/tell-us-what-to-do-with-a-sad-misogynist-who-wants-us-to-pay-attention-to-his-misogyny-and-homophobia 16 +Sydney Brownstone 17 +"Tell us what to do with a sad misogynist who wants us to pay attention to his misogyny and homophobia" 18 +Sydney Brownstone is a Seattle-based former staff writer at Coexist. She lives in a Brooklyn apartment and covers environment, health, and data. She's written for the Village Voice, Mother Jones, Brooklyn Magazine, The L Magazine, and has contributed to NPR. 19 +The Daryush "Roosh" Valizadeh is a homophobe and a misogynist. He runs 20 +AND 21 +the 1AC. 22 + 23 +Counterplan solves the AFF with 3 Net Benefits 24 + 25 + 26 + 27 +====1: Proper agonism. 28 + 29 +When misogynists counter-protest feminist movements, they don't want to engage in dialogue or discussion. The confrontation makes both parties angry and the situation devolves into a scream-fest of insults and swearing. If we make it so that feminists can have their protests, and THEN engage in discourse in the aftermath of their presentation, productive dialogue between individuals can exist because the environment is less hostile. 30 +Wyden ==== 31 +http://oureverydaylife.com/deal-misogynist-17862.html 32 +"How to Deal With a Misogynist" Genevieve Van Wyden 2016 33 +Genevieve Van Wyden began writing in 2007. She has written for "Tu Revista Latina" and owns three blogs. She has worked as a CPS social worker, gaining experience in the mental-health system. Van Wyden earned her Bachelor of Arts in journalism from New Mexico State University in 2006. 34 +This world is made up of all types of people, including men, women 35 +AND 36 +sexist voices AND create zones for discourse in casual environments which prevents hostility. 37 + 38 + 39 +====2: Effective Protest. 40 + 41 +When feminists are able to protest effectively without being hindered by patriarchal interference, they can raise awareness and express opinions on social stigma and prejudice. Protest have been a major part of change in the past and the 1NC is a call to stop silencing them and let the possibilities free flow. ==== 42 +Gallagher 43 +Brenden Gallagher ""The Most Powerful Feminist Protests Against Donald Trump"" 44 +https://www.merryjane.com/culture/most-powerful-feminist-protests-against-donald-trump 45 +October 27, 2016 Brenden Gallagher works in television and writing in Los Angeles. He worked on Revenge, Heartbeat, and Famous in Love. His writing has appeared at Complex, VH1, and MERRY JANE. 46 +Though there has been a lot of negativity swirling around Donald Trump through this election 47 +AND 48 +creating feminist epistemology because I allow protests to go unfettered by masculine hindrance. 49 + 50 + 51 +====3: Critical Reflection. 52 + 53 +The thesis of the 1AC is that womxn are silenced and prevented from speaking. My advocacy makes it so that anti-feminists who want to counter-protest are silenced and prevented from speaking which forces them to understand and undergo the process of having their speech devalued. The 1NC makes THEM understand how YOU feel, which allows for critical reflection and makes real change possible. 54 +Marsden 55 +Harriet Marsden 56 +http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/feminism-straight-white-men-didnt-ask-to-be-born-silenced-by-feminazi-meanies-guardian-article-a7227021.html 57 +"I feel for the straight white men who are being silenced by the mean girls of modern feminism" 58 +Harriet Marsden is a freelance journalist talking world culture, politics and lifestyle, often through the form of critical analysis and parody. She is an author for The Independent and specializes in feminism and gender discourse. 59 + 60 +You would be forgiven for mistaking it for a Daily Mash headline – but no, it's real. The Guardian has published a piece today under the headline "'I didn't choose to be straight, white and male': are modern men the suffering sex?" The premise of the article is that men are feeling "silenced" by the spectre of gender equality. As I walk down the halls of hallowed institutions admiring the rows of (white male) portraits of former leaders, and I watch our Prime Minister (only the second female in a long line of white males) attempt to shout over her cabinet of predominantly white male MPs, I have to remind myself how silenced white men are. The press, the politicians, the police, the powerful…notwithstanding the undeniable fact that these are all still predominantly male, and white straight males at that, men are feeling silenced. Forget about the billions of women worldwide who are literally silenced by patriarchal oppression, poverty, racial inequality, and femicide. No, the silencing of men in the western world is now the social issue du jour. And we know this because they're complaining and being interviewed about it. Apparently, a "well-educated, professionally successful and mostly very progressive male friend" (you have to enjoy that qualifying "mostly") sent Guardian journalist Rose Hackman a video of women beating up men, presumably to make the point that feminism is running rampant with its violence and its misandry and its general advocating of beating men to a pulp. Forget the estimated two women dying every week in the UK as a result of domestic violence, or how violence against women has been the norm in pretty much every culture in the entire world at some point. Forget that. Hey, look at this YouTube video! According to this mostly progressive male, women are "having their cake and eating it too", profiting from an unfair double standard and "getting away with stuff men never would". Like sexual assault? Like mass shootings? Like war crimes? Like terrorist attacks? Like human trafficking? Forget the statistics which show how disproportionate the gender divide of these crimes is. Apparently, women are committing these atrocities just as much as men – but they're getting away with it. Political correctness gone mad! Apparently, the "increasingly equal society has made men the suffering sex", and there's no denying "the consistency, and therefore validity, of the feelings being ~~expressed~~." I had no idea that if a feeling is consistent, it must be valid. Thousands of racists rejoice – your feelings are now "valid". I have a bit of a problem with the microphone "being handed over" to men for their views on how women becoming seen as real and equal humans might be negatively affecting them. But then again, women have had the monopoly on public discourse since language was invented. Women have had the podium for long enough – decades, in fact. That's more than enough time. We should actually hand the microphone back to men. According to Michael Kimmel, executive director of the Centre for the Study of Men and Masculinities (imagine their mailing list) the world used to be "our locker room" where men could say what they wanted. "Now a lot of guys have to watch what they say. That's got to be hard." It is, Mr Kimmel! Wouldn't it be excellent if we could all shout about our burning cystitis every time the bus goes over a bump? Wouldn't you love to finally admit to your co-worker that their voice you want to stab yourself in the face? Watching what we say is so hard! The Guardian article provides a selection of male voices to wax lyrical on how silenced they are, men chosen for "a lack of overt disrespect towards women" – that's a category you don't want to lose in. Highlights include Tom, a butcher from Seattle, who howls: "We talk about accepting people – that someone didn't choose to be trans, or gay…I didn't choose to be straight, white and male." Because of course, you can equate the political struggles, emotional trauma, hate crimes, prejudice, under-representation, imprisonment and murders of the global gay or trans communities with the frustrations of a white male butcher. So to all you over-privileged, economically advantaged and socially unpersecuted white cisgendered males out there, I say this: I'm sorry you're suffering. I'm sorry you didn't choose to be born who you are. I didn't choose to be born into a racially segregated patriarchy where menstruation and childbirth render me intolerant of your suffering, and where I'm statistically more likely to be raped, murdered or discriminated against than you. But we all have our crosses to bear.==== 61 + 62 + 63 +====Outweighs in terms of strength into your role of the ballot- My praxis allows both womxn and mxn to learn from politics of exclusion and inclusion which means my education method can make real change a possibility between both groups 64 +==== 65 + 66 + 67 +====Puts terminal defense on the 1AC- your method can never hope to achieve change because it is perceived by men to just be women getting mad at them for actions that have been implanted in them as normal. The CP resolves this because it makes misogynists deal with the reality of being silenced and makes it possible for them to come to the conclusion it is universally bad to be unheard 68 + 69 +==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-04 19:51:00.208 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +ikd - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Marcus - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +14 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Dulles Kurian Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JF- Counter-Protest CP - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Colleyville
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +13 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-02 21:05:03.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idr - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +fa - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +strae
- Caselist.RoundClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +15 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-04 19:45:47.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +New age ontology - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Kantian Metaphysics - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +IKD
- Caselist.RoundClass[13]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +16 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-04 19:47:17.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jacob - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +knnk - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Colleyville
- Caselist.RoundClass[14]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-04 19:50:51.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +ikd - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Marcus - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +jnk - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Colleyville