Changes for page Dulles Kurian Neg
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 1 added, 1 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,7 +1,0 @@ 1 -interpretation: If the affirmative defends a parametriczed advocacy, then the aff debater must disclose the entirety of their plan text and citations for the plan's topical solvency advocate on the NDCA wiki at least an hour before the round. 2 -Violation: 3 -Standard: Predictability – 4 - 5 -Clash- 6 - 7 -Framework: Theory is competing interps since a) any brightline for reasonability is arbitrary, which forces intervention; only minimization makes sense and b) it fosters a race to the top by promoting proactively better norms for debate. No RVI since a) it strategically disincentives theory to check unfair positions, b) commits the logical fallacy of denying the antecedent, since just because you prove that you're being fair doesn't mean that you win. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-12-17 18:18:15.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -idr - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -idk - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -4 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Dulles Kurian Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JANFEB Disclosure Theory - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -strae
- Caselist.RoundClass[11]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-02 21:05:03.35 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idr - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +fa - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +strae