Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[5]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[4]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[5]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-12-17 18:56:16.586
	1	+2016-12-17 18:56:16.0

Caselist.CitesClass[4]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,42 @@
	1	+I affirm and value morality because ought implies a moral obligation.
	2	+
	3	+Notions of normativity and laws constantly shift through time. All decisions are made with the knowledge that time may change them. Martin Hagglund writes.
	4	+Martin Hagglund. The Necessity of Discrimination Disjoining Derrida and Levinas. Project Muse. Diacritics 34.1:40-71.
	5	+“Once again, it is... has been prescribed.”
	6	+
	7	+Every ethical decision inevitably excludes other perspectives and is haunted by those “specters.” Hagglund 2
	8	+
	9	+ “In effect, every attempt... thus not be a struggle for peace, but only for what I will call “lesser violence.” END QUOTE
	10	+
	11	+The deconstructive concept of ethics is the only way to recognize these excluded beings and create meaningful political or ethical change. It is precisely because justice can open to interpretation, that it can be changed to always be better. Hagglund 3
	12	+
	13	+“Hence, Derrida argues that the ... is more or less discriminating and open to new attacks or conflicting demands.”
	14	+
	15	+Thus, the standard is embracing transformative justice.
	16	+
	17	+I contend protecting a right to free speech allows for a justice to come.
	18	+
	19	+Asserting you are right without defending your opinion makes dialogue impossible. It creates an us-them dichotomy which makes practical solutions inaccessible. Foucault: Foucault, Michel ~French post-structuralist~. “Polemics, Politics, and Problematizations.” In Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984. Ed. Paul Rabinow. 1 Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. The New Press. 1998.
	20	+
	21	+The polemicist, on ...surrenders or disappears.
	22	+
	23	+
	24	+Empirically true- collegiate trends against microaggressions deter meaningful engagement and make violent outburst inevitable. Lukianoff and Haidt Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt (Greg Lukainoff is president and CEO of Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, Jonathan Haidt is the Thomas Cooley professor of ethical leadership at NYU Stern. “The Coddling of the American Mind” The Atlantic. 9/15.
	25	+
	26	+
	27	+Burns defines magnification ... people the benefit of the doubt?
	28	+
	29	+Only engaging in the public sphere allows for change- we need to learn the tools needed to engage others so we can manage to persuade them of our issues and opinions. If people don’t know why they’re problematic, then calling them problematic does nothing but emblazon them to do whatever they need. Foucault 2: : Foucault, Michel ~French post-structuralist~. “Polemics, Politics, and Problematizations.” In Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984. Ed. Paul Rabinow. 1 Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. The New Press. 1998.
	30	+It is a question, ... to form a community of action.
	31	+
	32	+Causes spillover to the real world- outside of college is the real world- we need skills to deal with other people- creating an isolated space does nothing. Trump election proves uniqueness for my side- if we don’t actually convince people our issues matter nothing will ever change for the better. Lukianoff and Haidt 2Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt (Greg Lukainoff is president and CEO of Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, Jonathan Haidt is the Thomas Cooley professor of ethical leadership at NYU Stern. “The Coddling of the American Mind” The Atlantic. 9/15.
	33	+
	34	+
	35	+Attempts to shield students ... diverse faculty—would further serve that goal.
	36	+
	37	+And we need to engage in institutions- withdrawal reifies oppression and causes no change- this means the 1AC is key. Mouffe Chantal, Professor of Political Theory at the Centre for the Study of Democracy, University of Westminster, “The Importance of Engaging the State,” What is Radical Politics Today? October 2009, pgs. 233-237
	38	+In both Hardt and Negri, ...in my view, is how we should conceive the nature of radical politics.
	39	+
	40	+Empirically true- and controls the internal link to any oppression arguments- maintaining regimes of truth allows oppressive dictates to take control- only discourse allows individuals to challenge norms. Dungey 2k1 (Nicholas, Ph.D. from the University of California, lecturer in Political Science @ University of California, “(Re)Turning Derrida to Heidegger: Being-with-Others as Primordial Politics”, Polity, Vol. 33, No. 3 (Spring, 2001), pp. 455-477, Palgrave Macmillan Journals Stable,
	41	+
	42	+The desire for communal identity ... barbed wire, security zones, racial ghettos, and laws that are designed to separate and isolate.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-12-17 18:56:18.158

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Cedar Ridge MT

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+5

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Dulles Kurian Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Spectrethics 1AC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Strake