| ... |
... |
@@ -1,18
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-Plan Text: |
| 2 |
|
-Public colleges and universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech except for hate speech. |
| 3 |
|
-Lawrence 1 |
| 4 |
|
-Charles R. Lawrence III, "Crossburning and the Sound of Silence: Antisubordination Theory and the First Amendment," 1992, ~http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2784andcontext=vlr~~ |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
-"But there is no recognition..." |
| 7 |
|
-to |
| 8 |
|
-"...are still masters and slaves." |
| 9 |
|
- |
| 10 |
|
-The counterplan competes both textually and functionally—The Affirmative doesn't restrict any speech, we restrict hate speech. |
| 11 |
|
- |
| 12 |
|
-Hate speech poses a direct threat to the oppressed. Banning it is necessary to promote inclusiveness. |
| 13 |
|
-Waldron 12 |
| 14 |
|
-Jared Taylor summarizes Waldron, 12, Why We Should Ban "Hate Speech", American Renaissance, summarizing Jeremy Waldron, The Harm in Hate Speech, Harvard University Press, 2012, 292 pp., 26.95. 8/24/12, http://www.amren.com/features/2012/08/why-we-should-ban-hate-speech/ ((((Note – Taylor does not agree with but is summarizing Waldron's position)))) |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
-"First-Amendment guarantees of free..." |
| 17 |
|
-to |
| 18 |
|
-"...beat up and drive out minorities." |