Tournament: CPS | Round: 3 | Opponent: Ashland NL | Judge: Salim Damerdji
There are 4 dangers inherent in the 1ac-Fear, Clarity, Power, and Abolition, their revolutionary lines of flight become reordered in the logic of microfascism
Deleuze and Guattari 80
Gilles And Felix A Thousand Plateaus Micropolitics and Segmentary ASherm + mkultra
We cannot say that one of these three lines is bad and another good, by nature and necessarily...would rather annihilate its own servants than stop the destruction. All the dangers of the other lines pale by comparison. 

The 1ac is a capitulation to the logic of the control society, institutions may change, but in name alone. There is no need for fear or hope however, but simply a need to look for new weapons
Deleuze 90 Gilles Deleuze, “Postscript on Control Societies,” L’autre Journal 1, May 1990
Edited for gendered language

1. History Foucault located the disciplinary societies in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries ... like a universal system of deformation.

That independently results in the formulation of hierarchical structures, microfascism constructs vertical relationships between individuals
Deleuze and Guattari 80
Gilles And Felix A Thousand Plateuas pg 15 ASherm
To be rhizomorphous is to produce stems and filaments that seem to be roots, or better yet ...and thus arrives at an entirely different state of the unconscious

In response to a control society, we call for minoritarian war machines against the control assemblage through becoming
Newman ‘9 (Saul Newman, Professor of Political Theory@ ULondon, “Politics in the Age of Control”, Deleuze and New Technology, ed. Mark Poster, pg 115-120,)
Politics in Search of a People When discussing the new society of control, Deleuze tells us that there is no need to fear or to hope for the best, ... Perhaps, then, to overcome the society of control, we need to construct a new collective apparatus - a new collective politics based on the people and its radical potential.

Tournament: Voices | Round: 2 | Opponent: Meadow KS | Judge: Travi Fife
The affirmative posits themselves as masters of the theatre of policy, able to create a new reality which more closely resembles the ideal form which makes their plan defensible. This drive towards purification and explanation, this will to truth, is an attempt to escape suffering and creative potential which negates life.
Turanli 2k3 aydan, “nietzsche and the later wittgenstein”, journal of nietzsche studies, issue 26, p. 61-2, muse
The craving for absolutely general specifications results in doing metaphysics...which in Wittgenstein’s terms aims “to show the fly the way out of the fly-bottle” 

The affirmative attempts to extend this negative concept of mastery to the whole event of existence to eradicate chaos. Against such an ordering, you should affirm the free spirit as a toying with this slavish framework of life. It is the only positive choice.
Nietzsche 1873 “On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense”, pg 7
The free intellect copies human life, but it considers this life to be something good...may at least correspond creatively to the impression of the powerful present intuition.

The affirmative can always identify a particular threat to our existence. The insecurities of the affirmative are a daily reality. Their desire for mastery and control in response to these inherent conditions of life is a domestication of the world which attempts to cleanse the unknown. This isn’t just about death given that we all die, but the parts of life that make it valuable. Their act of pity negates our ability to affirm and create, making us boring creatures without much value. Their framework for life makes extinction desirable.
Nietzsche 1886 fredrich, “beyond good and evil”, aph # 225, pg. 342
Whether hedonism, or pessimism, or utilitarianism, or eudaimonianism (6)...only this suffering which has created all the things which raise man up?

Attempts to secure our experience of existence – physically or psychologically – suppress and internalize paranoiac fear. This produces life as a managerial project where we constantly struggle to prefect it through security. This fuels a ressentiment that negates beauty and life.
Der Derian 95 JAMES, ON SECURITY, PG. 29
The will to power, then, should not be confused with a hobbesian perpetual desire for power...to be patient and composed: he owes this artificial strength to the illusion of being protected by a god."

The alternative is to affirm destiny and chance. You should take the risk of exposing yourself to violent impacts, abandon the desire for mastery, and embrace the unknown and unfamiliar aspects of life by refusing to engage the 1ac. This risks danger but your mortality is something that is certain anyway. The alternative is the only way to live life eventfully and adventurously, through a rolling of the dice.
Deleuze 83 GILLES, “NIETZSCHE AND PHILOSOPHY”, PG. 25-27
The game has two moments which are those of a dicethrow...but the repetition of a dicethrow by the nature of the fatally obtained number

Tournament: CPS | Round: 2 | Opponent: Brentwood EL | Judge: Ryan Leigh
Resolve is the THE determiner of American hegemony – it’s key to deterrence and conflict effectiveness – anything else just prolongs violence
Eyago ‘5  7 / 8 / 05    Political Commentary – Sound Politics Reporter http://www.soundpolitics.com/archives/004721.html, Sound Commentary on Current Events in Seattle, Puget Sound and Washington State
Finally, I am angry at those who undermine our efforts to conduct this war. ...This goes infinitely more so for our public leaders. What they do for political gain is completely unconscionable.
That’s key to solve great power war and existential governance crises

That’s key to solve great power war and existential governance crises
Brooks, Ikenberry, and Wohlforth ’13 (Stephen, Associate Professor of Government at Dartmouth College, John Ikenberry is the Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University in the Department of Politics and the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, William C. Wohlforth is the Daniel Webster Professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth College “Don’t Come Home America: The Case Against Retrenchment,” International Security, Vol. 37, No. 3 (Winter 2012/13), pp. 7–51)
A core premise of deep engagement is that it prevents the emergence of a far more dangerous ...global military spending), and the gap between the U.S. military capability and that of potential rivals is by many measures growing rather than shrinking. 85

TURN: War engenders worse forms of oppression and suppression of rights
Goldstein 1—Prof  PoliSci @ American University, Joshua, War and Gender , P. 412
First, peace activists face a dilemma in thinking about causes of war and working for peace. Many peace scholars and activists support the approach, ..., in light of this book's evidence, the emphasis on injustice as the main cause of war seems to be empirically inadequate.