Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[10]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[10]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,40 +1,0 @@
1		-====The affs resistance to qualified immunity represents a violent endorsement of positivism and a resistance to indeterminacy- the coherentist demand on modernity papers over the disparate temporality inherent to qualified immunity—politicizing a fundamental anxiety to the unknown====
2		-**Meyer 15 **~~Linda ross, Associate Professor of Law, Quinnipiac College. B.A., 1984, University of Kansas; J.D., 1987, Ph.D., 1991, University of California, Berkeley., published in NYU law review~~ CS
3		-A look at these doctrinal areas reveals that acknowledgements of radical legal "indeterminacy"
4		-AND
5		-norms are more available to us than any circuit or district court decision.
6		-
7		-
8		-====State sovereignty serves as a universal lens through which to view the world and conduct political life – it constitutes a fantasy attempting to avoid confronting uncertainty, even to the point of violent imposition.====
9		-Edkins, professor at Aberystwyth 2002 ~~Jenny "The Subject of the Political" Sovereignty and Subjectivity~~
10		-We have shown that the subject is of necessity incomplete, or impossi¬ble. It
11		-AND
12		-. Their actions respond to what they sup¬pose are the desires of authority.
13		-
14		-
15		-====Conceiving of Law as a Form of Ethics Fails—It Maintains Metaphysics At the Cost of a Higher Goal, Making the True Ethical Act Less Possible====
16		-Steven D. Smith, Professor, Notre Dame Law School, ARTICLE: Believing Like a Lawyer, Boston College Law Review, September, 1999, p.lexis
17		-In this spirit, some recent scholarship presents legal discourse as a method of practical
18		-AND
19		-of "practical reason" in less exotic, more plausible forms. n71
20		-
21		-
22		-====The aff's political project is impossible—the plan stands in for a future world, but there is always some obstacle to our political visions which will met with violence and ultimately risks extinction—examining the structure of desire and enjoyment rather than projecting better political worlds is the only means of channeling the death drive away from catastrophe====
23		-McGowan 2013 —- Associate Professor at the University of Vermont (Todd, Enjoying What We Don't Have, Project Muse)//trepka
24		-There is no path leading from the death drive to utopia. The death drive
25		-AND
26		-recognize that we enjoy the lost object only insofar as it remains lost.
27		-
28		-
29		-====The alternative is an ethic of desire—The act of demanding government change is doomed to failure because situating our demands with the state creates an addiction to refusal that maintains the worst elements of our political structure—their framework arguments are only coherent within this perverse commitment to the status quo, and all of the purported benefits to their model of debate require the intervention of our alternative first====
30		-Lundberg 12 —- ‎Professor and Communication Strategies Consultant (Christian, Lacan in Public, Published by The University of Alabama Press, Project Muse) CS
31		-On Resistance: The Dangers of Enjoying One's Demands The demands of student revolutionaries and
32		-AND
33		-and productivity of frustrated demand as part and parcel of antagonistic democratic struggle.
34		-
35		-
36		-====The impact is endless war —- the refusal to use psychoanalysis means we ignore the collective unconscious of the public and the leaders which allows manipulation of values to justify irrational invasions —- our internal anxieties about failing to solve the aff are projected onto the other, creating them as an enemy to be exterminated and legitimating nuclear conflict====
37		-Jacobsen 2013 —- University of Chicago (Kurt, "Why Freud matters: Psychoanalysis and international relations revisited", International Relations, SagePub)CS
38		-Psyche, self-interest, and warfare Updating Thucydides, 'what made war
39		-AND
40		-not a compelling slogan to emblazon on a scholarly banner, Occam notwithstanding.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-12-04 00:36:14.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-You

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Strake Jesuit CP VL

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-10

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Dougherty Valley Sayani Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1nc~-~-Psychoanalysis

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Mineapple