| ... |
... |
@@ -1,19
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-====Expressing the unconscious through the use of decipherable semiotics is the pitfall of expression – language and communication seeks to codify the uncodifiable, to know the unknowable, removing fantasy and mystery from the equation==== |
| 2 |
|
-**Baudrillard and Hildreth, 81** ~~Jean and Lee, "Beyond The Unconscious: The Symbolic," Discourse journal, vol. 3, spring edition, pg. 79-81, //MW~~ |
| 3 |
|
-Treating words as things ... in order to express the thing - the unconscious - |
| 4 |
|
-AND |
| 5 |
|
-and exorcism, even orgiastic mysticism, is well known, witness Héliogabale.). |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
-====The Impact is a bastaridzation of language and eternal violence—the discursive framing of the unconscious dooms us to become spectators and participants in the reality show of violence==== |
| 9 |
|
-**Baudrillard 96** ~~Jean, March 4, "Disneyworld Company"~~ |
| 10 |
|
-But the Disney enterprise goes beyond the imaginary. Disney, the precursor, the |
| 11 |
|
-AND |
| 12 |
|
-to imagine a virtual universe or the fourth dimension ~~la quatrieme dimension~~. |
| 13 |
|
- |
| 14 |
|
- |
| 15 |
|
-====The alternative is the disjunction of language – language will never be a reference to the real. Instead, it should be used to further distance from the real, and return it more disjointed and confused than it is now.==== |
| 16 |
|
-**Baudrillard 95** ~~Jean, April 19, "Radical Thought"~~ |
| 17 |
|
-Our point is not to defend radical thought. Any idea that can be defended |
| 18 |
|
-AND |
| 19 |
|
-return it a little bit more unintelligible. A little bit more enigmatic. |