| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,19 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Expressing the unconscious through the use of decipherable semiotics is the pitfall of expression – language and communication seeks to codify the uncodifiable, to know the unknowable, removing fantasy and mystery from the equation==== |
|
2 |
+**Baudrillard and Hildreth, 81** ~~Jean and Lee, "Beyond The Unconscious: The Symbolic," Discourse journal, vol. 3, spring edition, pg. 79-81, //MW~~ |
|
3 |
+Treating words as things ... in order to express the thing - the unconscious - |
|
4 |
+AND |
|
5 |
+and exorcism, even orgiastic mysticism, is well known, witness Héliogabale.). |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+====The Impact is a bastaridzation of language and eternal violence—the discursive framing of the unconscious dooms us to become spectators and participants in the reality show of violence==== |
|
9 |
+**Baudrillard 96** ~~Jean, March 4, "Disneyworld Company"~~ |
|
10 |
+But the Disney enterprise goes beyond the imaginary. Disney, the precursor, the |
|
11 |
+AND |
|
12 |
+to imagine a virtual universe or the fourth dimension ~~la quatrieme dimension~~. |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+====The alternative is the disjunction of language – language will never be a reference to the real. Instead, it should be used to further distance from the real, and return it more disjointed and confused than it is now.==== |
|
16 |
+**Baudrillard 95** ~~Jean, April 19, "Radical Thought"~~ |
|
17 |
+Our point is not to defend radical thought. Any idea that can be defended |
|
18 |
+AND |
|
19 |
+return it a little bit more unintelligible. A little bit more enigmatic. |