| ... |
... |
@@ -1,23
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-====Next is the CP==== |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-====Text: The United States Federal Government should ==== |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-====-ratify the draft Treaty on Prevention of the Placement of Weapons in Outer Space and of the Threat or Use of Force against Outer Space Objects,==== |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
- |
| 10 |
|
-====-fully fund its unilateral efforts to colonize Mars,==== |
| 11 |
|
- |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-====-propose to cooperate with Japan and Russia.==== |
| 14 |
|
- |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
-====Last two planks solve colonization – NRC is in the context of general cooperation ==== |
| 17 |
|
- |
| 18 |
|
- |
| 19 |
|
-====First plank solves space militarization ==== |
| 20 |
|
-**Jaramillo 9 **(Cesar Jaramillo, graduated with a BA and an MA in political science and global governance, 12/1/09, "In Defence of the PPWT Treaty: Toward a Space Weapons Ban" Space Security, Volume 30, Issue 4, http://ploughshares.ca/pl_publications/in-defence-of-the-ppwt-treaty-toward-a-space-weapons-ban/, JSO) |
| 21 |
|
-The existing legal regime that tackles the potential weaponization of outer space is outdated, |
| 22 |
|
-AND |
| 23 |
|
-latter that is the primary focus of proponents of a space security treaty. |