Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[25]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[16]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[25]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-01-28 14:51:05.419
	1	+2017-01-28 14:51:05.0

Caselist.CitesClass[16]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,66 @@
	1	+K
	2	+
	3	+Reform is a lie: there is nothing the biopolitical state can’t overcome through vision Schulium
	4	+
	5	+Call: No Date: Schulium. Link http://bloom0101.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/ENGcall2.pdf
	6	+
	7	+Meanwhile – in Oregon…Third World War.”
	8	+
	9	+
	10	+
	11	+To try to be visible is to lose: independent link into the kritik and terminal defense Invisible Committee
	12	+
	13	+The Coming Insurrection is an anonymous book published in 2009 online. “Invisible Committee” is the name the anonymous authors gave themselves https://tarnac9.wordpress.com/texts/the-coming-insurrection/
	14	+In a demonstration…in no time.
	15	+
	16	+
	17	+The Alternative is a politics of invisibilty
	18	+
	19	+The only way to revolt is to not exist Invisible Committee
	20	+The Invisible Committee. The Cybernetic Hypothesis. 2001, Section XI http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/tiqqun-the-cybernetic-hypothesis.html
	21	+From the cybernetic…makes revolt possible
	22	+
	23	+NC
	24	+
	25	+The standard is util. Prefer it
	26	+You should default to util if I win defense —we naturally want to make the world better.
	27	+Walter Sinnott-Armstrong 14 American philosopher. He specializes in ethics, epistemology, and more recently in neuroethics, the philosophy of law, and the philosophy of cognitive science, "Consequentialism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed), BE
	28	+Even if consequentialists…as consequentialists claim.w
	29	+Non-utilitarian ethics fail within the realm of public policy. Deont doesn’t consider trade offs Woller
	30	+Woller 1997 (Gary, Economics Professor at BYU, “Policy Currents,” June, http://apsapolicysection.org/vol7_2/72.pdf )
	31	+Moreover, virtually all…in a democracy.
	32	+DA
	33	+International law banned hate speech Matsuda ’89 :
	34	+ Mari J. Matsuda (Associate Professor of Law, University of Hawaii, the William S. Richardson School of Law), "Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim's Story," Michigan Law Review, 1989 AZ
	35	+The international community…of eliminating discrimination.
	36	+
	37	+US adherence to international law concerning hate speech is key to credibility in international human rights Cohen ‘15 :
	38	+
	39	+ Tanya Cohen, "It’s Time To Bring The Hammer Down On Hate Speech In The U.S." Thought Catalog, 5/1/2015 AZ
	40	+Recent scandals involving right-wing hatemongers like Phil Robertson, Donald Sterling, Bill Maher, and the Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity have brought to light one of America’s biggest embarrassments: the fact that America remains the only country in the world without any legal protections against hate speech. In any other country, people like Phil Robertson and Donald Sterling would have been taken before a Human Rights Commission and subsequently fined and/or imprisoned and/or stripped of their right to public comment for making comments that incite hatred and violence against vulnerable minorities. But, in the US, such people are allowed to freely incite hatred and violence against vulnerable minorities with impunity, as the US lacks any legal protections against any forms of hate speech – even the most vile and extreme forms of hate speech remain completely legal in the so-called “land of the free”. Not only is this a violation of the most basic and fundamental human rights principles, but it’s also an explicit violation of legally-binding international human rights conventions. For many decades, human rights groups around the world – from Amnesty International to Human Rights First to the United Nations Human Rights Council – have told the United States that it needs to pass and enforce strong legal protections against hate speech in accordance with its international human rights obligations. As of 2015, the US is the only country in the world where hate speech remains completely legal. This is, in fact, a flagrant violation of international human rights law. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) both mandate that all countries outlaw hate speech, including “propaganda for war” and the dissemination of any “ideas based on racial superiority or hatred”. The ICCPR and ICERD are both legally-binding international human rights conventions, and all nations are required to uphold them in the fullest. By failing to prosecute hate speech, the US is explicitly and flippantly violating international human rights law. No other country would be allowed to get away with this, so why would the US? The United Nations has stated many times that international law has absolute authority. This is quite simply not optional. The US is required to outlaw hate speech. No other country would be able to get away with blatantly ignoring international human rights standards, so why should the US be able to? The US is every bit as required to follow international human rights law as the rest of the world is.
	41	+
	42	+Soft power solves multiple scenarios for extinction. Nye and Armitage 07
	43	+ Joseph Nye (Distinguished Service Professor at Harvard, and previous dean of Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government) and Richard Armitage (13th United States Deputy Secretary of State, the second-in-command at the State Department, serving from 2001 to 2005), “CSIS Reports – A Smarter, More Secure America”, 11/6, 2007 http://www.csis.org/component/option,com_csis_pubs/task,view/id,4156/type,1/
	44	+
	45	+Soft power is… will to fight.
	46	+
	47	+DA
	48	+Endowments are high now but dropping rapidly - protests are alienating alumni donors, who are of older generations Hartocollis 8/4 :
	49	+Anemona Hartocollis, writer for NYT: August 4, 2016(“College Students Protest, Alumni’s Fondness Fades and Checks Shrink” New York Times Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/us/college-protests-alumni-donations.html?_r=0 Accessed on 12/15/16)IG
	50	+Scott MacConnell cherishes…to campus protests.
	51	+
	52	+Endowment funds are key to US college competitiveness – ensures college quality Leigh ‘14
	53	+ Steven R. Leigh (dean of CU-Boulder’s College of Arts and Sciences), "Endowments and the future of higher education," UColorado Boulder, March 2014 AZ
	54	+These broad trends…on how successfully
	55	+
	56	+Loss of funding kills quality of education too – turns case Mitchell et all 2:
	57	+Funding Down, Tuition Up State Cuts to Higher Education Threaten Quality and Affordability at Public Colleges UPDATED AUGUST 15, 2016
	58	+
	59	+Years of cuts…education funding.
	60	+
	61	+
	62	+
	63	+Funding cuts cause a closing down of black colleges and community builders: damages black empowerment
	64	+Historically black colleges in financial fight for their future Institutions assert their relevance amid financial concerns, falling enrollment October 22, 2013 11:00AM ET by Dexter Mullins (CWLC)
	65	+
	66	+In the last…Making It Happen."

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-01-28 14:51:07.2

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Nails

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Lassiter AO

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+25

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Cypress Woods Clarke Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+NC r3 emory

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Emory