| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,14 @@ |
|
1 |
+a. Link. International law was founded by, and continues to maintain, colonialism – Treaties don’t check state power, they secure it in by universalizing law and sovereign relationships. Gardner writes, |
|
2 |
+Gardner 10 David, Graduate student at San Diego State University, “The Colonial Nature of International Law”, E-International Relations Students, 6/8/2014, http://www.e-ir.info/2010/06/08/the-colonial-nature-of-international-law/, 7/28/2014 B.S |
|
3 |
+“International law was…law is colonial. |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+B. is the Impact and Alt |
|
6 |
+Vote negative – Continued reliance on international law will only result in war, inequality, environmental destruction, and racism. Instead, our alternative is to suspend our faith in the neutrality of international law and to speak the narrative of colonialism. Schmidt ’10 (Patrick, Department of Political Science, Macalester College, “MEETING THE ENEMY: AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, by Natsu Taylor Saito.” http://www.lawcourts.org/LPBR/reviews/saito0910.htm) |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+I do notbehind international law |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+C. is the role of the judge, there is a pre fiat obligation to reject colonialism, Dei explains, |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+G. J. Dei Anti-Colonialism and Education 2006 |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+The anti-colonial…and learning processes. |