Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[16]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[41]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[16]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-12-07 00:11:28.131
	1	+2016-12-07 00:11:28.0

Caselist.CitesClass[41]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,39 @@
	1	+====Deconstructive logic is constitutive of metaphysics. All concepts, identities, and judgements are constructed in opposition to their negative. There can be no conception of good without bad, friendship without betrayal, promises without promise breaking. Ontological violence is foundational to any ethical or political framework. ====
	2	+
	3	+=====HÄGGLUND: =====
	4	+"THE NECESSITY OF DISCRIMINATION DISJOINING DERRIDA AND LEVINAS" MARTIN HÄGGLUND // UH-DD
	5	+"Derrida targets precisely this logic of opposition. As he argues in Of Grammatology
	6	+AND
	7	+is in the service of perpetrating the better." (46-48)
	8	+
	9	+====And, deconstructive logic is a criticism of ideal starting points. The logic of opposition is incompatible with universal starting points that do away with violence. ====
	10	+
	11	+=====HÄGGLUND 2:=====
	12	+"THE NECESSITY OF DISCRIMINATION DISJOINING DERRIDA AND LEVINAS" MARTIN HÄGGLUND // UH-DD
	13	+"A~~n~~ possible objection here is that we must strive toward an
	14	+AND
	15	+paradigm for what better debating entails, which necessarily discriminates between various interpretations.
	16	+
	17	+====Thus, the standard is consistency with deconstructive logic. To clarify, violations of deconstructive logic entail the construction of judgements as pure and without the necessity of an oppositional negative.====
	18	+
	19	+===Independently prefer: ===
	20	+
	21	+====First, ethics requires answering the question of responsibility otherwise agents can always question why they are subject to the rule i.e "I know that a certain principle is moral, but why should I care about acting morally." However, any conception of ethical responsibility is rooted in deconstructive logic. ====
	22	+
	23	+=====HÄGGLUND 3:=====
	24	+"THE NECESSITY OF DISCRIMINATION DISJOINING DERRIDA AND LEVINAS" MARTIN HÄGGLUND // UH-DD
	25	+"For the same reason, Derridaʼs notion of "infinite responsibility" should not
	26	+AND
	27	+responsibility is but another name for the necessity of discrimination." (56)
	28	+
	29	+====Second, ethical relationships are mediated through radical alterity. The other is always undecidable and carries the possibility of annihilating me, yet this very condition is necessary to have any relationship whatsoever. This requires a violent opening to ethics. ====
	30	+
	31	+=====HÄGGLUND 4:=====
	32	+"THE NECESSITY OF DISCRIMINATION DISJOINING DERRIDA AND LEVINAS" MARTIN HÄGGLUND // UH-DD
	33	+"Thus, Derrida articulates a double argument concerning the relation between self and other
	34	+AND
	35	+, a prohibition necessarily extends a particular judgement to the realm of purity.
	36	+
	37	+Contention:
	38	+
	39	+ANALYTICAL

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-12-07 00:11:30.503

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Kim Hsun, Chris Castillo, Barrett Baker

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Kinkaid JY

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+16

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Quarters

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Cy-Fair Welch Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+NOV-DEC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+UT