| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,48 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Legal reform causes grey holes—piecemeal reform is legal legitimation without meaningful legal constrains; that's terminal defense to the AFF.==== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+====Feldman '15==== |
|
5 |
+Leonard Feldman, Associate Professor of Political Science Ph.D. University of Washington. Department of Political Science "Police Violence and the Legal Temporalities of Immunity" Hunter College, CUNY. 2015 AL |
|
6 |
+The advantage of Dyzenhaus' "legal grey holes" concept over the concept of " |
|
7 |
+AND |
|
8 |
+even as fully consistent with norms of due process, reasonableness and equality. |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+====Historically QI court cases that attempt to further sound civil rights litigation, end up expanding protection for police officers. Layering temporalities, creating legal time frames, and replacing bright line rules with balancing tests prove how immunity reform creates larger legal indeterminacy. Turns case – aff furthers indeterminacy ==== |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+====Feldman 2==== |
|
15 |
+Leonard Feldman, Associate Professor of Political Science Ph.D. University of Washington. Department of Political Science "Police Violence and the Legal Temporalities of Immunity" Hunter College, CUNY. 2015 AL |
|
16 |
+My argument in this section is that the Supreme Court has created a legal grey |
|
17 |
+AND |
|
18 |
+determination of "qualified immunity," which I discuss in the next section. |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+====Legal reforms hurt social justice– starting from the perspective of legal solutions forecloses the political imagination and hampers radical solutions—turns the aff ==== |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+ |
|
24 |
+====Kandaswamy '12==== |
|
25 |
+Priya Kandaswamy, Associate Professor Women's, Gender and Sexuality Studies, Mills College "THE OBLIGATIONS OF FREEDOM AND THE LIMITS OF LEGAL EQUALITY" SOUTHWESTERN LAW REVIEW Vol. 41, pg 265, 1/21/2012 |
|
26 |
+Despite a vast array of critiques that have elucidated the ways in which the U |
|
27 |
+AND |
|
28 |
+could look like and locate legal interventions in relation to this broader vision. |
|
29 |
+ |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+====Reject the aff's faith in the law's ability to solve social problems in favor of critical analysis of the laws purported objectivity and its violent exclusion of alternative perspectives. ==== |
|
32 |
+ |
|
33 |
+ |
|
34 |
+====Singer '84==== |
|
35 |
+Joseph William Singer Associate Professor of Law, Boston University. B.A., Williams College 1976; M.A., Harvard University 1978; J.D., Harvard Law School 1 981 "The Player and the Cards: Nihilism and Legal Theory," Yale Law Journal (94 Yale L.J. 1), The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc. November, http://www.jstor.org/stable/796315 AL |
|
36 |
+ What shall we do then about legal theory? I think we should abandon |
|
37 |
+AND |
|
38 |
+live together. We are going to have to answer that question ourselves. |
|
39 |
+ |
|
40 |
+ |
|
41 |
+====We ought to prioritize movements for deconstructive resistance over blind faith in legal studies. Only the alt can effectively contest domestic cultures of violence. ==== |
|
42 |
+ |
|
43 |
+ |
|
44 |
+====Hirst '15==== |
|
45 |
+Hirst, Aggie She, Lecturer in International Politics @ City University London, "Derrida and Political Resistance: The Radical Potential of Deconstruction" Globalizations, Vol. 12.1 http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/7127/1/Hirst_DerridaPoliticalResistance.pdf |
|
46 |
+There are many manifestations of the practical consequences of deconstructive resistance across a range of |
|
47 |
+AND |
|
48 |
+commitments, dealing with difference in terms and contexts other than the familiar. |