| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,16 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Courts ineffective spaces for social change. Lures Social Movements into an arena where they will lose. ==== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+=====Southwort 99:===== |
|
4 |
+**Ann, Associate Professor of Law, Case Western Reserve University, The Boston Public Interest Law Journal, Spring, 8 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 469** |
|
5 |
+Two persistent criticisms from the left are that lawyers fail to understand, or refuse |
|
6 |
+AND |
|
7 |
+resources away from more effective strategies, and leaves larger social change undone. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+====Courts fail to enforce. Lack of compliance motivating resources. ==== |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+=====Rosenberg '08:===== |
|
13 |
+**Rosenberg '08 (Gerald N, "The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Really Bring About Social Change: Second Edition," University of Chicago Press, September 15 2008, https://www.scribd.com/doc/23598246/The-Hollow-Hope-Can-Courts-Bring-About-Social-Change-Second-Edition, TW)** |
|
14 |
+The third constraint on courts involves implementation. In the environmental area this constraint is |
|
15 |
+AND |
|
16 |
+the best-intentioned judicial decisions may hurt rather than help the environment. |