| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,60 @@ |
|
1 |
+====The border is a zone of difference which makes possible violence in the borderland. Rigid distinctions between epistemological systems of thinking cannot account for hybridity. Embracing the borderland resist colonialism within epistemology itself. ==== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+=====KYNČLOVÁ:===== |
|
4 |
+**Tereza Jiroutová Kynčlová, « Elastic, Yet Unyielding: The U.S.-Mexico Border and Anzaldúa's Oppositional Rearticulations of the Frontier », European journal of American studies ~~Online~~, Vol 9, No 3 ~| 2014, document 3, Online since 23 December 2014, connection on 17 August 2016. URL : http://ejas.revues.org/10384 ; DOI : 10.4000/ Special Issue: Transnational Approaches to North American Regionalism // UH-DD** |
|
5 |
+"The border functions as a sign that represents the region of U.S |
|
6 |
+AND |
|
7 |
+part of a civil war within representation" (xiv)." (2) |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+====Our approach is not purely grounded in the theoretical. The epistemology of binaries creates categories of normality within both sides of the dualism. This subjugates the lived experiences of those who can't fit neither side of the border. ==== |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+=====KYNČLOVÁ:===== |
|
13 |
+**Tereza Jiroutová Kynčlová, « Elastic, Yet Unyielding: The U.S.-Mexico Border and Anzaldúa's Oppositional Rearticulations of the Frontier », European journal of American studies ~~Online~~, Vol 9, No 3 ~| 2014, document 3, Online since 23 December 2014, connection on 17 August 2016. URL : http://ejas.revues.org/10384 ; DOI : 10.4000/ Special Issue: Transnational Approaches to North American Regionalism // UH-DD** |
|
14 |
+"The physical presence of the border that separates the prosperity of the United States |
|
15 |
+AND |
|
16 |
+composition and methodology of Borderlands/La Frontera." (3-4) |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+====The affirmatives focus on acknowledging difference in search for ethics reifies the binaries that make invisible violence done in borderlands of dualisms. Only a theory that recognizes becoming in the borderland and the struggle of recognition in doing so can solve. ==== |
|
20 |
+KYNČLOVÁ: |
|
21 |
+**Tereza Jiroutová Kynčlová, « Elastic, Yet Unyielding: The U.S.-Mexico Border and Anzaldúa's Oppositional Rearticulations of the Frontier », European journal of American studies ~~Online~~, Vol 9, No 3 ~| 2014, document 3, Online since 23 December 2014, connection on 17 August 2016. URL : http://ejas.revues.org/10384 ; DOI : 10.4000/ Special Issue: Transnational Approaches to North American Regionalism // UH-DD** |
|
22 |
+"Demarcation lines, separation lines, dividing lines, boundaries, frontiers, borders |
|
23 |
+AND |
|
24 |
+process of negotiation, becoming, and struggle for recognition." (2) |
|
25 |
+ |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+====Prohibition reinscribes domination ==== |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+=====Ball n.d:===== |
|
30 |
+**Ball n.d (Anna, ~~University of Manchester,~~ "Writing in the Margins: Exploring the Borderlands in the Work of Janet Frame and Jane Champion," Borders and Boundaries, Esharp Issue 5, n.d. http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_41163_en.pdf, TW)** |
|
31 |
+How might the border, a spatial construct, be linked to cultural identity? |
|
32 |
+AND |
|
33 |
+contested, defended, fought over. (2002, p.198) |
|
34 |
+ |
|
35 |
+ |
|
36 |
+====Nuclear Power is socially constructed in "packages" of cultural meaning—this creates a rigid dualism. ==== |
|
37 |
+ |
|
38 |
+=====Wagenaar 11:===== |
|
39 |
+**Wagenaar, H. Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2011. Print.** |
|
40 |
+Although "frame" and "framing" have become standard terms in policy analysis |
|
41 |
+AND |
|
42 |
+-friendly, low-energy life style; Public Accountability, which |
|
43 |
+ |
|
44 |
+ |
|
45 |
+====The alternative is to embrace NEPANTLA as a starting point for an epistemology that recognizes the exclusion of the borderland through dualisms. This creates the possibility of bridging the object-subject duality that keeps the mestiza a prisoner by recuperating the possibility of a space in between that allows us to theorize about new forms of becoming and productive epistemologies. ==== |
|
46 |
+ |
|
47 |
+=====Zaccaria:===== |
|
48 |
+**PAOLA ZACCARIA Living in El Lugar of Transformations, Translating Vision into Writing // UH-DD** |
|
49 |
+"In my opinion all these transformational performances which speak of agency also relate to |
|
50 |
+AND |
|
51 |
+of as multicultural/mestizo/nepantla translationscapes." (186-191) |
|
52 |
+ |
|
53 |
+ |
|
54 |
+====The role of the ballot is to adopt Nepantla pedagogy. Outweighs their role of the ballot – their unquestionable starting point of needing to construct debate through a singular axis rein trenches borders and epistemological colonialism in education. ==== |
|
55 |
+ |
|
56 |
+=====Abraham:===== |
|
57 |
+**Abraham, S. (2014). A Nepantla pedagogy: Comparing Anzaldúa's and Bakhtin's Ideas for pedagogical and social change. Critical Education, 5(5). University of Georgia // UH-DD** |
|
58 |
+"Nepantla is the site of transformation. The place where different perspectives come into |
|
59 |
+AND |
|
60 |
+our educational research (Gonzalez-Lopez, 2006; Keating, 2006)." |