| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,41 @@ |
|
1 |
+In order for an action to be moral, it must be first willed universally: |
|
2 |
+1. An agent’s will acts on a law that it gives to itself. If pleasure were a law to you, then you would straightaway do the pleasurable act, but since you’re autonomous, you can reason about taking the action. Thus a condition of action is that the will is self-determined. |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+KORSGAARD: |
|
5 |
+“Self-Constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant” by Christine M. Korsgaard |
|
6 |
+“It remains to |
|
7 |
+AND |
|
8 |
+which you act.” (120-123) |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+And, only universally willing can be self-determined. |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+KORSGAARD 2: |
|
13 |
+“Self-Constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant” by Christine M. Korsgaard |
|
14 |
+“The second step is |
|
15 |
+AND |
|
16 |
+action of something within him.” (123-124) |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+Analytic |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+2. Actions are expressions of an agent’s reasoning from their end to the means, which unifies their action into a cohesive movement as opposed to fragmented steps. |
|
21 |
+ROEDL: |
|
22 |
+Sebastian Roedl. Prof. Of Philosophy, University of Leipzig. “Two Forms of Practical Knowledge and Their Unity” in Ford and Hornsby, Eds. Essays on Anscombe's Intention (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011) 239.
|
|
23 |
+“We can give a |
|
24 |
+AND |
|
25 |
+of her nexus.” |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+Analytic |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+Analytiic |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+Thus, the sufficient negative burden is to prove that prohibiting the production of nuclear power cannot be willed as a universal principle. |
|
32 |
+ |
|
33 |
+Contention: |
|
34 |
+No empirical object is intrinsically valuable. Their value lies only in relationship to rational agency. |
|
35 |
+KANT: |
|
36 |
+Immanuel Kant founder of analytic philosophy “Critique of Pure Reason” 1781 |
|
37 |
+“We have therefore |
|
38 |
+AND |
|
39 |
+we can coerce everyone else. |
|
40 |
+ |
|
41 |
+Analytic |