| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,40 @@ |
|
1 |
+**Offense:** |
|
2 |
+Using the particular to inform the universal is key. Critique versus racist ideology is hopeless. Only the NC allows change because a common and binding feature is present. |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+PENSKY: |
|
5 |
+“The Cambridge Companion to Habermas” by Stephen K. White 1995 |
|
6 |
+“The universalist |
|
7 |
+AND |
|
8 |
+their own interest.” |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+2. Connecting text to the real world is key to produce social change. A “straight away” revolutionary approach is doomed since it lacks self-reflection. Refusal to engage in theory turns their argument. |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+SMITH and EATON: |
|
13 |
+“Role of reflection and praxis in community-based learning and social justice work” by Toby Smith and Marie Eaton http://cielearn.org/wp-content/themes/ciel/docs/Praxis_Social20Justice202-10.pdf |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+“If reflection is an |
|
16 |
+AND |
|
17 |
+between text and our lives. ” |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+3. The Kantian subject is the embodied subject—universalizability is essential to mutual recognition of others. |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+FARR: |
|
22 |
+Arnold Farr (prof of phil @ UKentucky, focusing on German idealism, philosophy of race, postmodernism, psychoanalysis, and liberation philosophy). “Can a Philosophy of Race Afford to Abandon the Kantian Categorical Imperative?” JOURNAL of SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY, Vol. 33 No. 1, Spring 2002, 17–32. |
|
23 |
+ |
|
24 |
+“One of the most popular |
|
25 |
+AND |
|
26 |
+other moral agents. |
|
27 |
+ |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+**Defense:** |
|
30 |
+1. Analytic |
|
31 |
+ |
|
32 |
+2. There is nothing good or bad about endorsing certain ideas. All ideas have been misused or applied to do horrible things. Ideas are not bad; people are bad. |
|
33 |
+WOOD: |
|
34 |
+“Kantian Ethics” By Allen W. Wood. |
|
35 |
+ |
|
36 |
+“Often, criticisms of Kant |
|
37 |
+AND |
|
38 |
+that people do.” |
|
39 |
+ |
|
40 |
+3. Analytic |