| ... |
... |
@@ -1,26
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-TURN Genealogy entrenches us back into the subjective mindset it tries to get rid of |
| 2 |
|
-Ashenden 1: |
| 3 |
|
-Ashenden, Senior lecturer in sociology at Birbek university, and Owen, Lecturer in politics at the University of Southampton, 99 Samantha and David, Foucault Contra Habermas: Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory, (Sage Publications) pp. 62-63 |
| 4 |
|
- |
| 5 |
|
-Foucault's fateful turn |
| 6 |
|
-AND |
| 7 |
|
-hegemony of subject-centred reason. |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-TURN Genealogy encounters a perf con, it can only ensure the validity of the geneology by withholding critical analysis. |
| 10 |
|
-Ashenden 2: |
| 11 |
|
-Ashenden 2 , Senior lecturer in sociology at Birbek university, and Owen, Lecturer in politics at the University of Southampton, 99 Samantha and David, Foucault Contra Habermas: Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory, (Sage Publications) pp. 62-63 |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
- This genealogical detour, |
| 14 |
|
-AND |
| 15 |
|
-counterdiscourse of modernity. |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
- |
| 18 |
|
-Turn- Their prioritization representations and historicity is problematic since it ignores the oppression being faced in the status quo. |
| 19 |
|
-KAUFMAN |
| 20 |
|
-Taft-Kaufman, 95 - Professor, Department of Speech Communication And Dramatic Arts, Central Michigan University – 1995 (Jill, “Other ways: Postmodernism and performance praxis,” The Southern Communication Journal, Vol.60, Iss. 3; pg. 222) |
| 21 |
|
- |
| 22 |
|
-In its elevation |
| 23 |
|
-AND |
| 24 |
|
-material objects and bodily subjects. |
| 25 |
|
- |
| 26 |
|
-Link turns your access to the role of the ballot, emphasis on using history to “bring subjugated knowledge to light” abstracts away from oppression and destroys movements |