| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,26 @@ |
|
1 |
+TURN Genealogy entrenches us back into the subjective mindset it tries to get rid of |
|
2 |
+Ashenden 1: |
|
3 |
+Ashenden, Senior lecturer in sociology at Birbek university, and Owen, Lecturer in politics at the University of Southampton, 99 Samantha and David, Foucault Contra Habermas: Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory, (Sage Publications) pp. 62-63 |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+Foucault's fateful turn |
|
6 |
+AND |
|
7 |
+hegemony of subject-centred reason. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+TURN Genealogy encounters a perf con, it can only ensure the validity of the geneology by withholding critical analysis. |
|
10 |
+Ashenden 2: |
|
11 |
+Ashenden 2 , Senior lecturer in sociology at Birbek university, and Owen, Lecturer in politics at the University of Southampton, 99 Samantha and David, Foucault Contra Habermas: Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory, (Sage Publications) pp. 62-63 |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+ This genealogical detour, |
|
14 |
+AND |
|
15 |
+counterdiscourse of modernity. |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+Turn- Their prioritization representations and historicity is problematic since it ignores the oppression being faced in the status quo. |
|
19 |
+KAUFMAN |
|
20 |
+Taft-Kaufman, 95 - Professor, Department of Speech Communication And Dramatic Arts, Central Michigan University – 1995 (Jill, “Other ways: Postmodernism and performance praxis,” The Southern Communication Journal, Vol.60, Iss. 3; pg. 222) |
|
21 |
+ |
|
22 |
+In its elevation |
|
23 |
+AND |
|
24 |
+material objects and bodily subjects. |
|
25 |
+ |
|
26 |
+Link turns your access to the role of the ballot, emphasis on using history to “bring subjugated knowledge to light” abstracts away from oppression and destroys movements |