Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[63]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[64]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[63]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-02-04 13:01:42.354
	1	+2017-02-04 13:01:42.0

Caselist.CitesClass[64]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,67 @@
	1	+The affirmatives orientation towards identity politics ie is trapped within dualistic epistemologies that reinforce the very structures they seek to destroy. The polarization of identity politics destroys any progress. This is terminal defense to AFF solvency.
	2	+ANZALDUA:
	3	+Anzaldúa, Gloria. The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader. Duke University Press, 2009. UH-DD
	4	+
	5	+“I've been thinking
	6	+AND
	7	+long-term visions of social justice?” (Pg. 301-302)
	8	+
	9	+
	10	+Multiple Impacts:
	11	+1. Antiblackness cannot account for the unique experiences racially black folks experience. We understand that blackness is a structure that creates similar conditions for black individuals but individuals are ontologically asymmetrical. This determines each individuals’ orientation towards anti-black structures. They will only homogenize.
	12	+YOUNG:
	13	+“Inclusion and Democracy” Iris Marion Young // UH-DD
	14	+
	15	+“From these failings =
	16	+AND
	17	+among which we choose.’” (99-102)
	18	+
	19	+
	20	+2. Oppression manifest itself because of dualistic distinctions that normalize epistemologies of difference. The division between our consciousness and subconsciousness further normalizes these views. Border bridging allows us to reclaim our subconscious and reverse norms of domination.
	21	+TAMDIGIDI:
	22	+Mohammad H., Prof. @ U. Mass-Boston, “I Change Myself, I Change the World”: Gloria Anzaldua’s Sociological Imagination in Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza”, Humanity and Society, 2008, p. JSTOR
	23	+
	24	+“All major concepts in Anzaldua's thought,=
	25	+AND
	26	+our culture, our languages, our thoughts..”
	27	+
	28	+
	29	+3. Dualisms propagate border violence. The border is a zone of difference which makes possible violence in the borderland. Rigid distinctions between epistemological systems of thinking cannot account for hybridity. Embracing the borderland resist colonial domination within epistemology and ethics itself.
	30	+KYNCLOVA:
	31	+Tereza Jiroutová Kynčlová, « Elastic, Yet Unyielding: The U.S.-Mexico Border and Anzaldúa’s Oppositional Rearticulations of the Frontier », European journal of American studies Online, Vol 9, No 3 | 2014, document 3, Online since 23 December 2014, connection on 17 August 2016. URL : http://ejas.revues.org/10384 ; DOI : 10.4000/ Special Issue: Transnational Approaches to North American Regionalism // UH-DD
	32	+“The border functions as a
	33	+AND part of a civil war within representation” (xiv).” (2)
	34	+
	35	+
	36	+Our critic is not abstract theory. The epistemology of binaries creates categories of normality within both sides of the dualism. This subjugates the lived experiences of those who can’t fit neither side of the border and universalizes an epistemically false interpretation of the world.
	37	+KYNCLOVA 2:
	38	+Tereza Jiroutová Kynčlová, « Elastic, Yet Unyielding: The U.S.-Mexico Border and Anzaldúa’s Oppositional Rearticulations of the Frontier », European journal of American studies Online, Vol 9, No 3 | 2014, document 3, Online since 23 December 2014, connection on 17 August 2016. URL : http://ejas.revues.org/10384 ; DOI : 10.4000/ Special Issue: Transnational Approaches to North American Regionalism // UH-DD
	39	+
	40	+“The physical presence
	41	+AND
	42	+methodology of Borderlands/La Frontera.”
	43	+
	44	+The alternative is to endorse Nepantla. This is an epistemological starting point that recognizes the exclusion of the borderland. This creates the possibility of bridging the subconscious-conscious duality that keeps the mestiza a prisoner by recuperating the possibility of a space in between.
	45	+ZACCARIA:
	46	+PAOLA ZACCARIA Living in El Lugar of Transformations, Translating Vision into Writing UH-DD
	47	+
	48	+“In my opinion all
	49	+AND
	50	+in process of nepantla-translation.
	51	+
	52	+Our criticism is not a theorizing of a world without distinctions, we don’t think we get rid of the reality of blackness, rather we are a methodology to reverse the colonization of our forms of thinking about distinctions, which have been reduced to epistemologies that stigmatize the possibility of new forms of becoming.
	53	+KYNCLOVA 3:
	54	+Tereza Jiroutová Kynčlová, « Elastic, Yet Unyielding: The U.S.-Mexico Border and Anzaldúa’s Oppositional Rearticulations of the Frontier », European journal of American studies Online, Vol 9, No 3 | 2014, document 3, Online since 23 December 2014, connection on 17 August 2016. URL : http://ejas.revues.org/10384 ; DOI : 10.4000/ Special Issue: Transnational Approaches to North American Regionalism // UH-DD
	55	+
	56	+ “Anzaldúa’s aim is not
	57	+AND
	58	+as well as collective psychological dimension.” (11-12)
	59	+
	60	+
	61	+The judge should adopt Nepantla pedagogy. Outweighs counter judge obligations– the need to construct debate through a singular axis rein trenches borders and epistemological colonialism in education. This is specifically true for normalizing pedagogies that assume themselves to be true without normative groundwork.
	62	+ABRAHAMS:
	63	+Abraham, S. (2014). A Nepantla pedagogy: Comparing Anzaldúa’s and Bakhtin’s Ideas for pedagogical and social change. Critical Education, 5(5). University of Georgia // UH-DD
	64	+
	65	+“Nepantla is the site
	66	+AND
	67	+frame our educational research (Gonzalez-Lopez, 2006; Keating, 2006).”

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-02-04 13:01:43.204

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Kris Wright

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Cypress Woods CJ

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+28

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Cy-Fair Welch Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JAN-FEB Borderlands K v2

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Colleyville