| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,14 @@ |
|
1 |
+1. We can only see reasons through he perspective of the individual agent, we can’t detach value or ends from the individual perspective, so we can’t extract some kind of universal perspective. |
|
2 |
+Nagel: |
|
3 |
+Thomas Nagel, "Agent-Relativity and Deontology," The View From Nowhere: New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), pp, 164- 185. |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+Most of the things |
|
6 |
+AND |
|
7 |
+qualification as an impersonal value. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+2. We need not accept the reasons that others give us—no need to universalize. Gibbard: |
|
10 |
+Gibbard, Allan. Morality as Consistency in Living: Korsgaard's Kantian Lectures, Ethics 110 (October 1999): 140 –164. |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+You can obligate me, |
|
13 |
+AND |
|
14 |
+that precludes egoism? |