| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,36 @@ |
|
1 |
+=Libertarianism NC= |
|
2 |
+I negate, |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+====Governments are designed to protect individual freedoms. Liberty is a crucial component for humans to be moral agents, it is inalienable characteristic of our humanity.==== |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+=====Ripstein '09:===== |
|
7 |
+Ripstein '09 (Arthur, ~~Professor of Law and Philosophy at the University of Toronto, Associate editor of Philosophy and Individual Affairs,~~ "Force and Freedom," President and Fellows of Harvard University Press, 2009, TW) |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+You are independent |
|
10 |
+AND |
|
11 |
+of his humanity.10 |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+Thus the best criterion for the round is respecting liberty. |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+===Contention One// Prohibitions on production of nuclear power violates liberty.=== |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+====Subpoint A). Prohibitions aren't justified based on the possibility for something bad to happen – otherwise we would have nothing left.==== |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+=====Block and Block 2k:===== |
|
22 |
+Block and Block 2k (Walter and Matthew, "Toward a Universal Libertarian Theory of Gun (Weapon) Control: a Spatial and Geographical Analysis," Ethics, Place and Environment, Vol 3, No 3, pg 289-298, 2000, http://www.walterblock.com/wp-content/uploads/publications/theory_gun_control.pdf, TW) |
|
23 |
+ |
|
24 |
+In contrast, were a |
|
25 |
+AND |
|
26 |
+squarely upon the plaintiff. |
|
27 |
+ |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+====Subpoint B). Nuclear power is not an aggressive or immoral activity – no matter personal opinions it cannot be banned.==== |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+=====Casey '12:===== |
|
32 |
+Casey '12 (Gerard, "Libertarian Anarchy: Against the State," Bloomsbury Publishing, 2012, https://books.google.com/books?id=lUESBwAAQBAJanddq=libertarianism+on+prohibition+on+nuclear+powerandsource=gbs_navlinks_s, TW) |
|
33 |
+ |
|
34 |
+It should now be |
|
35 |
+AND |
|
36 |
+be subject of legal prohibition. |