Changes for page Cy-Fair Welch Aff
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 5 added, 7 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[26]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,111 +1,0 @@ 1 -====First, our body is a condensed history of millions of years of mutations, and we continue to be vulnerable to the random laws of genetics. Random mutations create the inevitable conditions for evolution and explain the diversity of life. ==== 2 - 3 -=====Haviland ~~1~~:===== 4 -Haviland, William A. Anthropology: The Human Challenge, 15th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2017. ~~Yuzu~~. UH-DD 5 -"At the level of an 6 -AND 7 -for some new adaptation." (Pg. 41) 8 - 9 -Implications: 10 -A) Analytic 11 -B) Analytic 12 -C) Analytic 13 -D) Analytic 14 -E) Analytic 15 -F) Analytic 16 - 17 -====The evolution of our brains created the conditions for cultural adaptation. No longer did we have to wait generations to prevail environmental pressures. Through culture, we could overcome challenges that were not possible from a purely biology standpoint. ==== 18 - 19 -=====Haviland ~~2~~: ===== 20 -Haviland, William A. Anthropology: The Human Challenge, 15th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2017. ~~Yuzu~~. UH-DD 21 -"In the quest for 22 -AND 23 -and cultural change." (Pg. 167-168) 24 - 25 -Implications: 26 -A. Analytic 27 -B. Analytic 28 -C. Analytic 29 -D. Analytic 30 - 31 -====And, if cultural conflict is inevitable, the goal of intercultural politics is not to eradicate conflict, but to channel conflict in ways productive to intercultural coexistence. This requires an agonistic commitment, which reframes the other as an advisory instead of an enemy. ==== 32 - 33 -=====Mouffe ~~1~~:===== 34 -"On the Political" by Chantal Mouffe 2000 UH-DD 35 -"Once the theoretical terrain 36 -AND 37 -in an ongoing confrontation." (Pg. 101-102) 38 - 39 -====Thus, the standard is promoting agonistic democracy. To clarify, the standard is concerned with following the constitutive procedures of agonistic democracy, not ends. ==== 40 - 41 -=====Mouffe ~~2~~:===== 42 -On the Political" by Chantal Mouffe 2000 UH-DD 43 -"To avoid any confusion, 44 -AND 45 -for conflicting interpretations." (Pg. 120-121) 46 - 47 -===Contention One – === 48 - 49 -====A – Analytic.==== 50 - 51 -====B – Injurious speech subjugates agents but paradoxically marks them as socially recognizable within language. This presents a site of linguistic reversibility. Since language is temporal, we can reverse the norms that make injurious speech possible. ==== 52 - 53 -=====BUTLER ~~1~~:===== 54 -"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD 55 -"One is not simply fixed by the name that one is called. In being called an injurious name, one is derogated and demeaned. But the name holds out another possibility as well: by being called a name~~d~~, one is also, paradoxically, given a certain possibility for social existence, initiated into a temporal life of language that exceeds the prior purposes that animate that call. Thus the injurious address may appear to fix or paralyze the one it hails, but it may also produce an unexpected and enabling response. If to be addressed is to be interpellated, then the offensive call runs the risk of inaugurating a subject in speech who comes to use language to counter the offensive call. When the address is injurious, it works its force upon the one it injures. What is this force, and how might we come to understand its faultlines?" (Pg. 2) 56 - 57 -Analytic 58 - 59 -===Contention Two – === 60 - 61 -====A - Hate speech is different from hate crimes ==== 62 - 63 -=====Kamier:===== 64 -Kaminer Wendy (author, lawyer, journalist at the Atlantic and civil libertarian) "Why We Need to Tolerate Hate" Nov. 28 2012, The Atlantic, http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/11/why-we-need-to-tolerate-hate/265654/ KA 65 -Decorate your house 66 -AND 67 -business of the state. 68 - 69 -====B - Agonism requires the diversity of beliefs to allow engagement.==== 70 - 71 -=====Mouffe ~~3~~:===== 72 -(Chantal Mouffe, Professor at the Department of Political Science of the Institute for Advanced Studies. June 2000. "The Democratic Paradox")\ 73 -I submit that this 74 -AND 75 -thinking is invaluable. 76 - 77 -===Contention Three – === 78 - 79 -====Censorship allows our own logic to get co-opted crushing social movements.==== 80 - 81 -=====Adler '96:===== 82 -(Adler, Amy. "Whats Left?: Hate Speech, Pornography, And The Problem For Artistic Expression." California Law Review, Vol. 84, No. 6. December 1996. Web. December 07, 2016. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3481093.) 83 -The failure of leftist 84 -AND 85 -left's very eyes. 86 - 87 -====Censorship is an issue of interpretation. This ensures cooption. ==== 88 - 89 -=====BUTLER ~~2~~:===== 90 -"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD 91 -"Indeed, recent efforts 92 -AND 93 -the moment of utterance." (Pg. 13) 94 - 95 -====Censorship only reifies the reigning hegemonic ideology. ==== 96 - 97 -=====Ward '90:===== 98 -Ward '90 (Dr. David V, ~~Phil Prof at Widener University,~~ "Library Trends," Philosophical Issues in Censorship and Intellectual Freedom, Vol 39, No 1 and 2, 1990, pg 86-87) 99 - 100 -Second, even if the opinion 101 -AND 102 -the expressions of others. 103 - 104 -===Underview=== 105 - 106 -====Arguments about construction of certain identities can never turn the framework- that misses the goal of agonism. Identity politics homogenizes and turns their identity.==== 107 -Mouffe 4 ~~Chantal Mouffe, Professor at the Department of Political Science of the Institute for Advanced Studies. June 2000. "The Democratic Paradox"~~ 108 - 109 -A well-functioning democracy 110 -AND 111 -basis of civility. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-02 19:52:45.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Cathy Terrace - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Earl Warren NO - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -21 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Cy-Fair Welch Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JAN-FEB Radical Democracy AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -University of Houston
- Caselist.CitesClass[27]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,7 +1,0 @@ 1 -Anti-blackness is not an ontological antagonism~-~~-~-conflict is inevitable in politics, but does not have to be demarcated around whiteness and blackness. 2 - 3 -Peter Hudson 13, Political Studies Department, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg , South Africa, has been on the editorial board of the Africa Perspective: The South African Journal of Sociology and Theoria: A Journal of Political and Social Theory and Transformation, and is a member of the Johannesburg Workshop in Theory and Criticism, The state and the colonial unconscious, Social Dynamics: A journal of African studies, 2013 4 - 5 -Thus the self-same/other 6 -AND 7 -based on a determinate identity. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-02 19:52:45.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Cathy Terrace - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Earl Warren NO - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -21 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Cy-Fair Welch Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 A2 Blackness is Ontological - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -University of Houston
- Caselist.CitesClass[28]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,108 +1,0 @@ 1 -First, our body is a condensed history of millions of years of mutations, and we continue to be vulnerable to the random laws of genetics. Random mutations create the inevitable conditions for evolution and explain the diversity of life. 2 -Haviland ~1~: 3 - 4 -Haviland, William A. Anthropology: The Human Challenge, 15th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2017. ~Yuzu~. UH-DD 5 -"At the level of an 6 -AND 7 -for some new adaptation." (Pg. 41) 8 - 9 -Implications: 10 -A) Analytic 11 -B) Analytic 12 -C) Analytic 13 -D) Analytic 14 -E) Analytic 15 -F) Analytic 16 - 17 -The evolution of our brains created the conditions for cultural adaptation. No longer did we have to wait generations to prevail environmental pressures. Through culture, we could overcome challenges that were not possible from a purely biology standpoint. 18 -Haviland ~2~: 19 - 20 -Haviland, William A. Anthropology: The Human Challenge, 15th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2017. ~Yuzu~. UH-DD 21 -"In the quest for 22 -AND 23 -and cultural change." (Pg. 167-168) 24 - 25 -Implications: 26 -A. Analytic 27 -B. Analytic 28 -C. Analytic 29 -D. Analytic 30 - 31 -And, if cultural conflict is inevitable, the goal of intercultural politics is not to eradicate conflict, but to channel conflict in ways productive to intercultural coexistence. This requires an agonistic commitment, which reframes the other as an advisory instead of an enemy. 32 -Mouffe ~1~: 33 - 34 -"On the Political" by Chantal Mouffe 2000 UH-DD 35 -"Once the theoretical terrain 36 -AND 37 -in an ongoing confrontation." (Pg. 101-102) 38 - 39 -Thus, the standard is promoting agonistic democracy. To clarify, the standard is concerned with following the constitutive procedures of agonistic democracy, not ends. 40 -Mouffe ~2~: 41 - 42 -On the Political" by Chantal Mouffe 2000 UH-DD 43 -"To avoid any confusion, 44 -AND 45 -for conflicting interpretations." (Pg. 120-121) 46 - 47 -Contention One – 48 - 49 -A – Analytic. 50 -B – Injurious speech subjugates agents but paradoxically marks them as socially recognizable within language. This presents a site of linguistic reversibility. Since language is temporal, we can reverse the norms that make injurious speech possible. 51 -BUTLER ~1~: 52 - 53 -"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD 54 -"One is not simply = 55 -AND 56 -understand its faultlines?" (Pg. 2) 57 - 58 -Analytic 59 - 60 -Contention Two – 61 - 62 -Agonism requires the diversity of beliefs to allow engagement. 63 -Mouffe ~3~: 64 - 65 -(Chantal Mouffe, Professor at the Department of Political Science of the Institute for Advanced Studies. June 2000. "The Democratic Paradox")\ 66 -I submit that this 67 -AND 68 -thinking is invaluable. 69 - 70 -Contention Three – 71 - 72 -Censorship only reifies the reigning hegemonic ideology. 73 -Ward '90: 74 - 75 -Ward '90 (Dr. David V, ~Phil Prof at Widener University,~ "Library Trends," Philosophical Issues in Censorship and Intellectual Freedom, Vol 39, No 1 and 2, 1990, pg 86-87) 76 - 77 -Second, even if the opinion 78 -AND 79 -the expressions of others. 80 - 81 -Censorship is an issue of interpretation. This ensures cooption. 82 -BUTLER ~2~: 83 - 84 -"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD 85 -"Indeed, recent efforts 86 -AND 87 -the moment of utterance." (Pg. 13) 88 - 89 - 90 -Underview 91 - 92 -The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best meets their burden under a truth testing paradigm. Analytic 93 -Prefer: 94 - 95 -Standards of goodness for any activity, like debate, inevitably collapse to the intrinsic form. The ends of debate are inseparable from the rules that govern it. This alone explains the possibility of binding standards. 96 -BOYLE and LAVIN: 97 -Boyle, Matthew and Douglas Lavin. 2010. Goodness and desire. In Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good, ed. Sergio Tenenbaum. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 32-33. DD 98 -"A certain standard of goodness for a thing follows inevitably from its belonging to 99 -AND 100 -an arbitrary claim, but a premise up for debate under truth testing. 101 - 102 -Outweighs: 103 -A. Analytic 104 -B. Analytic 105 -C. Analytic 106 -D. Analytic 107 - 108 -Analytic - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-02 19:53:22.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Arun Sharma, Neel Yereni, Daniel Conrad - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Cedar Park MG - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -22 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quarters - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Cy-Fair Welch Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JAN-FEB Radical Democracy AC v2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -University of Houston
- Caselist.CitesClass[29]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,25 +1,0 @@ 1 -A) Interp - All debaters with awareness and access to the NDCA 16-17 LD Wiki, located at “hsld.debatecoaches.org”, must disclose all broken positions on said wiki at least 30 minutes before the round or provide their own accessible contact information. All disclosure must occur on one’s own wiki page including the tags citation, and first and last three words of each card. 2 - 3 -B) Violation - 4 - 5 -C) Reasons to Prefer - 6 - 7 -1. small school inclusivity 8 - 9 -Bietz ’10: 10 -Bietz, Mike. “The Case for Public Case Disclosure.” NFL Rostrum, Vol. 84, Issue 9. May 2010. https://nationalforensicleague.org/DownloadHandler.ashx?File=/userdocs/publications/05-201020Complete20Rostrum.pdf 11 -Big teams already get 12 -AND 13 -have the resources to travel as much. 14 - 15 -2. Educational benefits 16 - 17 - a) 18 - 19 - b) 20 - 21 -3. Engagability 22 - 23 -D) Implication 24 - 25 - (changes) - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-03 05:28:19.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -24 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Cy-Fair Welch Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 General Disclosure Interp - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any
- Caselist.RoundClass[21]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -26,27 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-02 19:52:43.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Cathy Terrace - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Earl Warren NO - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -5 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,2 +1,0 @@ 1 -1AC - Radical Democracy AC 2 -1N - Afropessism K - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -University of Houston
- Caselist.RoundClass[22]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -28 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-02 19:53:20.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Arun Sharma, Neel Yereni, Daniel Conrad - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Cedar Park MG - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Quarters - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,2 +1,0 @@ 1 -1AC - Radical Democracy 2 -1N - Nepantla K ROTB Term Papers PIC Agonism = Consequences Case Turns - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -University of Houston
- Caselist.RoundClass[24]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -29 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-03 05:28:17.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -All - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Any
- Caselist.CitesClass[23]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,111 @@ 1 +====First, our body is a condensed history of millions of years of mutations, and we continue to be vulnerable to the random laws of genetics. Random mutations create the inevitable conditions for evolution and explain the diversity of life. ==== 2 + 3 +=====Haviland ~~1~~:===== 4 +Haviland, William A. Anthropology: The Human Challenge, 15th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2017. ~~Yuzu~~. UH-DD 5 +"At the level of an 6 +AND 7 +for some new adaptation." (Pg. 41) 8 + 9 +Implications: 10 +A) Analytic 11 +B) Analytic 12 +C) Analytic 13 +D) Analytic 14 +E) Analytic 15 +F) Analytic 16 + 17 +====The evolution of our brains created the conditions for cultural adaptation. No longer did we have to wait generations to prevail environmental pressures. Through culture, we could overcome challenges that were not possible from a purely biology standpoint. ==== 18 + 19 +=====Haviland ~~2~~: ===== 20 +Haviland, William A. Anthropology: The Human Challenge, 15th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2017. ~~Yuzu~~. UH-DD 21 +"In the quest for 22 +AND 23 +and cultural change." (Pg. 167-168) 24 + 25 +Implications: 26 +A. Analytic 27 +B. Analytic 28 +C. Analytic 29 +D. Analytic 30 + 31 +====And, if cultural conflict is inevitable, the goal of intercultural politics is not to eradicate conflict, but to channel conflict in ways productive to intercultural coexistence. This requires an agonistic commitment, which reframes the other as an advisory instead of an enemy. ==== 32 + 33 +=====Mouffe ~~1~~:===== 34 +"On the Political" by Chantal Mouffe 2000 UH-DD 35 +"Once the theoretical terrain 36 +AND 37 +in an ongoing confrontation." (Pg. 101-102) 38 + 39 +====Thus, the standard is promoting agonistic democracy. To clarify, the standard is concerned with following the constitutive procedures of agonistic democracy, not ends. ==== 40 + 41 +=====Mouffe ~~2~~:===== 42 +(Chantal Mouffe, Professor at the Department of Political Science of the Institute for Advanced Studies. June 2000. "The Democratic Paradox") 43 +"To avoid any confusion, 44 +AND 45 +for conflicting interpretations." (Pg. 120-121) 46 + 47 +===Contention One – === 48 + 49 +====A – Analytic.==== 50 + 51 +====B – Injurious speech subjugates agents but paradoxically marks them as socially recognizable within language. This presents a site of linguistic reversibility. Since language is temporal, we can reverse the norms that make injurious speech possible. ==== 52 + 53 +=====BUTLER ~~1~~:===== 54 +"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD 55 +"One is not simply fixed by the name that one is called. In being called an injurious name, one is derogated and demeaned. But the name holds out another possibility as well: by being called a name~~d~~, one is also, paradoxically, given a certain possibility for social existence, initiated into a temporal life of language that exceeds the prior purposes that animate that call. Thus the injurious address may appear to fix or paralyze the one it hails, but it may also produce an unexpected and enabling response. If to be addressed is to be interpellated, then the offensive call runs the risk of inaugurating a subject in speech who comes to use language to counter the offensive call. When the address is injurious, it works its force upon the one it injures. What is this force, and how might we come to understand its faultlines?" (Pg. 2) 56 + 57 +Analytic 58 + 59 +===Contention Two – === 60 + 61 +====A - Hate speech is different from hate crimes ==== 62 + 63 +=====Kamier:===== 64 +Kaminer Wendy (author, lawyer, journalist at the Atlantic and civil libertarian) "Why We Need to Tolerate Hate" Nov. 28 2012, The Atlantic, http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/11/why-we-need-to-tolerate-hate/265654/ KA 65 +Decorate your house 66 +AND 67 +business of the state. 68 + 69 +====B - Agonism requires the diversity of beliefs to allow engagement.==== 70 + 71 +=====Mouffe ~~3~~:===== 72 +(Chantal Mouffe, Professor at the Department of Political Science of the Institute for Advanced Studies. June 2000. "The Democratic Paradox")\ 73 +I submit that this 74 +AND 75 +thinking is invaluable. 76 + 77 +===Contention Three – === 78 + 79 +====Censorship allows our own logic to get co-opted crushing social movements.==== 80 + 81 +=====Adler '96:===== 82 +(Adler, Amy. "Whats Left?: Hate Speech, Pornography, And The Problem For Artistic Expression." California Law Review, Vol. 84, No. 6. December 1996. Web. December 07, 2016. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3481093.) 83 +The failure of leftist 84 +AND 85 +left's very eyes. 86 + 87 +====Censorship is an issue of interpretation. This ensures cooption. ==== 88 + 89 +=====BUTLER ~~2~~:===== 90 +"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD 91 +"Indeed, recent efforts 92 +AND 93 +the moment of utterance." (Pg. 13) 94 + 95 +====Censorship only reifies the reigning hegemonic ideology. ==== 96 + 97 +=====Ward '90:===== 98 +Ward '90 (Dr. David V, ~~Phil Prof at Widener University,~~ "Library Trends," Philosophical Issues in Censorship and Intellectual Freedom, Vol 39, No 1 and 2, 1990, pg 86-87) 99 + 100 +Second, even if the opinion 101 +AND 102 +the expressions of others. 103 + 104 +===Underview=== 105 + 106 +====Arguments about construction of certain identities can never turn the framework- that misses the goal of agonism. Identity politics homogenizes and turns their identity.==== 107 +Mouffe 4 ~~Chantal Mouffe, Professor at the Department of Political Science of the Institute for Advanced Studies. June 2000. "The Democratic Paradox"~~ 108 + 109 +A well-functioning democracy 110 +AND 111 +basis of civility. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-07 13:58:53.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Cathy Terrace - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Earl Warren NO - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +19 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Cy-Fair Welch Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JAN-FEB Radical Democracy AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +University of Houston
- Caselist.CitesClass[24]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,7 @@ 1 +Anti-blackness is not an ontological antagonism~-~--conflict is inevitable in politics, but does not have to be demarcated around whiteness and blackness. 2 + 3 +Peter Hudson 13, Political Studies Department, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg , South Africa, has been on the editorial board of the Africa Perspective: The South African Journal of Sociology and Theoria: A Journal of Political and Social Theory and Transformation, and is a member of the Johannesburg Workshop in Theory and Criticism, The state and the colonial unconscious, Social Dynamics: A journal of African studies, 2013 4 + 5 +Thus the self-same/other 6 +AND 7 +based on a determinate identity. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-07 13:58:53.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Cathy Terrace - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Earl Warren NO - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +19 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Cy-Fair Welch Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2 A2 Blackness is Ontological - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +University of Houston
- Caselist.CitesClass[25]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,108 @@ 1 +First, our body is a condensed history of millions of years of mutations, and we continue to be vulnerable to the random laws of genetics. Random mutations create the inevitable conditions for evolution and explain the diversity of life. 2 +Haviland ~1~: 3 + 4 +Haviland, William A. Anthropology: The Human Challenge, 15th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2017. ~Yuzu~. UH-DD 5 +"At the level of an 6 +AND 7 +for some new adaptation." (Pg. 41) 8 + 9 +Implications: 10 +A) Analytic 11 +B) Analytic 12 +C) Analytic 13 +D) Analytic 14 +E) Analytic 15 +F) Analytic 16 + 17 +The evolution of our brains created the conditions for cultural adaptation. No longer did we have to wait generations to prevail environmental pressures. Through culture, we could overcome challenges that were not possible from a purely biology standpoint. 18 +Haviland ~2~: 19 + 20 +Haviland, William A. Anthropology: The Human Challenge, 15th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2017. ~Yuzu~. UH-DD 21 +"In the quest for 22 +AND 23 +and cultural change." (Pg. 167-168) 24 + 25 +Implications: 26 +A. Analytic 27 +B. Analytic 28 +C. Analytic 29 +D. Analytic 30 + 31 +And, if cultural conflict is inevitable, the goal of intercultural politics is not to eradicate conflict, but to channel conflict in ways productive to intercultural coexistence. This requires an agonistic commitment, which reframes the other as an advisory instead of an enemy. 32 +Mouffe ~1~: 33 + 34 +"On the Political" by Chantal Mouffe 2000 UH-DD 35 +"Once the theoretical terrain 36 +AND 37 +in an ongoing confrontation." (Pg. 101-102) 38 + 39 +Thus, the standard is promoting agonistic democracy. To clarify, the standard is concerned with following the constitutive procedures of agonistic democracy, not ends. 40 +Mouffe ~2~: 41 + 42 +(Chantal Mouffe, Professor at the Department of Political Science of the Institute for Advanced Studies. June 2000. "The Democratic Paradox") 43 +"To avoid any confusion, 44 +AND 45 +for conflicting interpretations." (Pg. 120-121) 46 + 47 +Contention One – 48 + 49 +A – Analytic. 50 +B – Injurious speech subjugates agents but paradoxically marks them as socially recognizable within language. This presents a site of linguistic reversibility. Since language is temporal, we can reverse the norms that make injurious speech possible. 51 +BUTLER ~1~: 52 + 53 +"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD 54 +"One is not simply = 55 +AND 56 +understand its faultlines?" (Pg. 2) 57 + 58 +Analytic 59 + 60 +Contention Two – 61 + 62 +Agonism requires the diversity of beliefs to allow engagement. 63 +Mouffe ~3~: 64 + 65 +(Chantal Mouffe, Professor at the Department of Political Science of the Institute for Advanced Studies. June 2000. "The Democratic Paradox")\ 66 +I submit that this 67 +AND 68 +thinking is invaluable. 69 + 70 +Contention Three – 71 + 72 +Censorship only reifies the reigning hegemonic ideology. 73 +Ward '90: 74 + 75 +Ward '90 (Dr. David V, ~Phil Prof at Widener University,~ "Library Trends," Philosophical Issues in Censorship and Intellectual Freedom, Vol 39, No 1 and 2, 1990, pg 86-87) 76 + 77 +Second, even if the opinion 78 +AND 79 +the expressions of others. 80 + 81 +Censorship is an issue of interpretation. This ensures cooption. 82 +BUTLER ~2~: 83 + 84 +"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD 85 +"Indeed, recent efforts 86 +AND 87 +the moment of utterance." (Pg. 13) 88 + 89 + 90 +Underview 91 + 92 +The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best meets their burden under a truth testing paradigm. Analytic 93 +Prefer: 94 + 95 +Standards of goodness for any activity, like debate, inevitably collapse to the intrinsic form. The ends of debate are inseparable from the rules that govern it. This alone explains the possibility of binding standards. 96 +BOYLE and LAVIN: 97 +Boyle, Matthew and Douglas Lavin. 2010. Goodness and desire. In Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good, ed. Sergio Tenenbaum. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 32-33. DD 98 +"A certain standard of goodness for a thing follows inevitably from its belonging to 99 +AND 100 +an arbitrary claim, but a premise up for debate under truth testing. 101 + 102 +Outweighs: 103 +A. Analytic 104 +B. Analytic 105 +C. Analytic 106 +D. Analytic 107 + 108 +Analytic - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-08 16:04:10.154 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Arun Sharma, Neel Yereni, Daniel Conrad - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Cedar Park MG - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +20 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quarters - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Cy-Fair Welch Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JAN-FEB Radical Democracy AC v2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +University of Houston
- Caselist.RoundClass[19]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +23,24 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-07 13:58:46.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Cathy Terrace - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Earl Warren NO - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,2 @@ 1 +1AC - Radical Democracy AC 2 +1N - Afropessism K - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +University of Houston
- Caselist.RoundClass[20]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-01-08 16:04:07.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Arun Sharma, Neel Yereni, Daniel Conrad - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Cedar Park MG - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Quarters - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,2 @@ 1 +1AC - Radical Democracy 2 +1N - Nepantla K ROTB Term Papers PIC Agonism = Consequences Case Turns - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +University of Houston