| ... |
... |
@@ -1,108
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-First, our body is a condensed history of millions of years of mutations, and we continue to be vulnerable to the random laws of genetics. Random mutations create the inevitable conditions for evolution and explain the diversity of life. |
| 2 |
|
-Haviland ~1~: |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-Haviland, William A. Anthropology: The Human Challenge, 15th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2017. ~Yuzu~. UH-DD |
| 5 |
|
-"At the level of an |
| 6 |
|
-AND |
| 7 |
|
-for some new adaptation." (Pg. 41) |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-Implications: |
| 10 |
|
-A) Analytic |
| 11 |
|
-B) Analytic |
| 12 |
|
-C) Analytic |
| 13 |
|
-D) Analytic |
| 14 |
|
-E) Analytic |
| 15 |
|
-F) Analytic |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
-The evolution of our brains created the conditions for cultural adaptation. No longer did we have to wait generations to prevail environmental pressures. Through culture, we could overcome challenges that were not possible from a purely biology standpoint. |
| 18 |
|
-Haviland ~2~: |
| 19 |
|
- |
| 20 |
|
-Haviland, William A. Anthropology: The Human Challenge, 15th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2017. ~Yuzu~. UH-DD |
| 21 |
|
-"In the quest for |
| 22 |
|
-AND |
| 23 |
|
-and cultural change." (Pg. 167-168) |
| 24 |
|
- |
| 25 |
|
-Implications: |
| 26 |
|
-A. Analytic |
| 27 |
|
-B. Analytic |
| 28 |
|
-C. Analytic |
| 29 |
|
-D. Analytic |
| 30 |
|
- |
| 31 |
|
-And, if cultural conflict is inevitable, the goal of intercultural politics is not to eradicate conflict, but to channel conflict in ways productive to intercultural coexistence. This requires an agonistic commitment, which reframes the other as an advisory instead of an enemy. |
| 32 |
|
-Mouffe ~1~: |
| 33 |
|
- |
| 34 |
|
-"On the Political" by Chantal Mouffe 2000 UH-DD |
| 35 |
|
-"Once the theoretical terrain |
| 36 |
|
-AND |
| 37 |
|
-in an ongoing confrontation." (Pg. 101-102) |
| 38 |
|
- |
| 39 |
|
-Thus, the standard is promoting agonistic democracy. To clarify, the standard is concerned with following the constitutive procedures of agonistic democracy, not ends. |
| 40 |
|
-Mouffe ~2~: |
| 41 |
|
- |
| 42 |
|
-(Chantal Mouffe, Professor at the Department of Political Science of the Institute for Advanced Studies. June 2000. "The Democratic Paradox") |
| 43 |
|
-"To avoid any confusion, |
| 44 |
|
-AND |
| 45 |
|
-for conflicting interpretations." (Pg. 120-121) |
| 46 |
|
- |
| 47 |
|
-Contention One – |
| 48 |
|
- |
| 49 |
|
-A – Analytic. |
| 50 |
|
-B – Injurious speech subjugates agents but paradoxically marks them as socially recognizable within language. This presents a site of linguistic reversibility. Since language is temporal, we can reverse the norms that make injurious speech possible. |
| 51 |
|
-BUTLER ~1~: |
| 52 |
|
- |
| 53 |
|
-"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD |
| 54 |
|
-"One is not simply = |
| 55 |
|
-AND |
| 56 |
|
-understand its faultlines?" (Pg. 2) |
| 57 |
|
- |
| 58 |
|
-Analytic |
| 59 |
|
- |
| 60 |
|
-Contention Two – |
| 61 |
|
- |
| 62 |
|
-Agonism requires the diversity of beliefs to allow engagement. |
| 63 |
|
-Mouffe ~3~: |
| 64 |
|
- |
| 65 |
|
-(Chantal Mouffe, Professor at the Department of Political Science of the Institute for Advanced Studies. June 2000. "The Democratic Paradox")\ |
| 66 |
|
-I submit that this |
| 67 |
|
-AND |
| 68 |
|
-thinking is invaluable. |
| 69 |
|
- |
| 70 |
|
-Contention Three – |
| 71 |
|
- |
| 72 |
|
-Censorship only reifies the reigning hegemonic ideology. |
| 73 |
|
-Ward '90: |
| 74 |
|
- |
| 75 |
|
-Ward '90 (Dr. David V, ~Phil Prof at Widener University,~ "Library Trends," Philosophical Issues in Censorship and Intellectual Freedom, Vol 39, No 1 and 2, 1990, pg 86-87) |
| 76 |
|
- |
| 77 |
|
-Second, even if the opinion |
| 78 |
|
-AND |
| 79 |
|
-the expressions of others. |
| 80 |
|
- |
| 81 |
|
-Censorship is an issue of interpretation. This ensures cooption. |
| 82 |
|
-BUTLER ~2~: |
| 83 |
|
- |
| 84 |
|
-"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD |
| 85 |
|
-"Indeed, recent efforts |
| 86 |
|
-AND |
| 87 |
|
-the moment of utterance." (Pg. 13) |
| 88 |
|
- |
| 89 |
|
- |
| 90 |
|
-Underview |
| 91 |
|
- |
| 92 |
|
-The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best meets their burden under a truth testing paradigm. Analytic |
| 93 |
|
-Prefer: |
| 94 |
|
- |
| 95 |
|
-Standards of goodness for any activity, like debate, inevitably collapse to the intrinsic form. The ends of debate are inseparable from the rules that govern it. This alone explains the possibility of binding standards. |
| 96 |
|
-BOYLE and LAVIN: |
| 97 |
|
-Boyle, Matthew and Douglas Lavin. 2010. Goodness and desire. In Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good, ed. Sergio Tenenbaum. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 32-33. DD |
| 98 |
|
-"A certain standard of goodness for a thing follows inevitably from its belonging to |
| 99 |
|
-AND |
| 100 |
|
-an arbitrary claim, but a premise up for debate under truth testing. |
| 101 |
|
- |
| 102 |
|
-Outweighs: |
| 103 |
|
-A. Analytic |
| 104 |
|
-B. Analytic |
| 105 |
|
-C. Analytic |
| 106 |
|
-D. Analytic |
| 107 |
|
- |
| 108 |
|
-Analytic |