Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[18]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[22]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[18]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-01-07 13:43:12.156
	1	+2017-01-07 13:43:12.0

Caselist.CitesClass[22]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,110 @@
	1	+Part 1 is Truth-Conditions
	2	+
	3	+The phrase "Any constitutionally protected speech" implies the resolution is questioning whether public colleges ought to follow the constitution. Prefer:
	4	+A. Analytic
	5	+
	6	+B. "Any" is defined as "used to indicate a maximum or whole." Analytic Implcication
	7	+Public colleges are extensions of the state's will. Two warrants:
	8	+A. The government is highly invested in our public education and carries laws that oversees compliance Armstrong 15:
	9	+RECALIBRATING REGULATION OF COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES Report of the Task Force on Federal Regulation of Higher Education - 2015 FINAL - Bipartisan group of U.S. Senators—Lamar Alexander (R-TN), Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), Richard Burr (R-NC), and Michael Bennet (D-CO) created the Task Force on Federal Regulation of Higher Education in the fall of 2013 and directed it to consider these issues in depth. https://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/Regulations_Task_Force_Report_2015_FINAL.pdf
	10	+The federal government's
	11	+AND
	12	+ federal investments.
	13	+
	14	+B. Public colleges and universities are funded by the state which is how the gov extends its will. Edwards 13:
	15	+Fiscal Federalism Chris Edwards -Writer for the Fiscal Federalism - June 1, 2013 https://www.downsizinggovernment.org/fiscal-federalism**
	16	+Unfortunately, policymakers and
	17	+AND
	18	+by the state.
	19	+
	20	+C. Analytic
	21	+
	22	+Thus the aff burden is to prove the state should follow its own constitution.
	23	+Part 2 is Offense
	24	+
	25	+The constitutive feature of any legal action within the U.S. is consistency with the constitution. The US is constrained by the constitution, which means it ultimately frames our sovereignty. The State Department:
	26	+The Constitution of the United States of America." Almanac of Policy Issues. June 2004. Web. http://www.policyalmanac.org/government/archive/constitution.shtml
	27	+It The Constitution establishes the form of the national government and defines the
	28	+AND
	29	+
	30	+2. The people in the government and citizens of the country change
	31	+
	32	+Impacts:
	33	+
	34	+1. Constitutivism.
	35	+A. Analytic
	36	+B. Analytic
	37	+
	38	+2. Analytic
	39	+A. Turns Freedom NCs: Freedom implies an innate right to determine the course of your actions. In the state of nature, might rather than right governs these judgements. In a state of nature, rights violations are inevitable. VARDEN:
	40	+ "A Kantian Conception of Free Speech" by Helga Varden Chapter from: "Freedom of Expression in a Diverse World" edited by Deirdre Golash 2010 LM-DD
	41	+"The first important distinction between Kant and much contemporary liberal thought issues from Kant's
	42	+AND
	43	+rather than as subject to anyone's arbitrary choices." (46-47)
	44	+
	45	+B. Turns Ks: The state of nature is counter-productive to critical liberation – while legal structures may be flawed, the state of nature is uniquely dangerous because it provides no check whatsoever on full-scale brutality and inhumanity.
	46	+
	47	+3. If the state is good for political progress, then it follows that the state should follow its own constitution because it affirms its rule of authority. The state is key for political progress, 2 warrants:
	48	+The state is a valuable heuristic that is key to tangible liberation. Zanotti 14
	49	+ (Dr. Laura Zanotti is an Associate Professor of Political Science at Virginia Tech. Her research and teaching include critical political theory as well as international organizations, UN peacekeeping, democratization and the role of NGOs in post-conflict governance."Governmentality, Ontology, Methodology: Re-thinking Political Agency in the Global World" – Alternatives: Global, Local, Political – vol 38(4):p. 288-304, obtained via school library being awesome.)
	50	+While there are important variations in the way international relations scholars use governmentality theory,
	51	+AND
	52	+where they are made rather than based upon their universal normative aspirations. 13
	53	+
	54	+Liberation is impossible without state, and non-tangible strategies cede the political.
	55	+Shaw:
	56	+
	57	+Shaw 99, professor of IR at the University of Sussex, 1999 (Martin, "The Unfinished Global Revolution: Intellectuals and the New Politics of International Relations", http://sussex.ac.uk/Users/hafa3/unfinished.pdf)
	58	+The mistakes in this passage are also twofold. First, the myth of globalisation
	59	+AND
	60	+sustaining local democracies, we have hardly begun to fashion a new agenda.
	61	+
	62	+Part 3 – Truth Testing
	63	+
	64	+The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best meets their burden under a truth testing paradigm. Analytic
	65	+Prefer:
	66	+
	67	+Standards of goodness for any activity, like debate, inevitably collapse to the intrinsic form. The ends of debate are inseparable from the rules that govern it. This alone explains the possibility of binding standards.
	68	+BOYLE and LAVIN:
	69	+Boyle, Matthew and Douglas Lavin. 2010. Goodness and desire. In Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good, ed. Sergio Tenenbaum. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 32-33. DD
	70	+"A certain standard of goodness for a thing follows inevitably from its belonging to
	71	+AND
	72	+an arbitrary claim, but a premise up for debate under truth testing.
	73	+
	74	+Outweighs:
	75	+A. Analytic
	76	+B. Analytic
	77	+C. Analytic
	78	+D. Analytic
	79	+
	80	+A. Analytic
	81	+
	82	+B. Analytic
	83	+
	84	+C. Any property assumes the truth of the property -. Thus any counter-role of the ballot collapses to truth testing—.
	85	+
	86	+FREGE:
	87	+Frege ’03. Frege, Gottlob. “The Thought: A Logical Inquiry” in Logicism and the Philosophy of Language: Selections from Frege and Russell. Broadview Press. March 2003. Pg. 204.
	88	+
	89	+“It may nevertheless
	90	+AND
	91	+point is found.”
	92	+
	93	+2. Truth testing doesn't exclude comparative ground, CPs, or Ks. If the neg's advocacy is morally required and it competes with the AFFs burden, then it proves the res false since the tradeoff proves we are morally obligated to reject the AFFs burden as being satisfied. This means that if the comparative world, CP or K doesn't compete on a post fiat level with the AFFs burden, it doesn't prove the res false.
	94	+This CP, K, and comparative ground outweighs:
	95	+
	96	+A. Actual World's Comparison
	97	+
	98	+B. Engagement
	99	+
	100	+3. ====The use of educational spaces as sites of empowerment place the judge into the role of the authoritarian adjudicator who molds students in accordance to a particular political end. This kills any conception of critical citizenship and advocacy skills. ====
	101	+
	102	+=====RICKERT:=====
	103	+Rickert, Thomas. ""Hands Up, You're Free": Composition in a Post-Oedipal World." JacOnline Journal DD
	104	+"An example of the connection between violence and pedagogy is implicit in the notion
	105	+AND
	106	+prove the res true, and still allows them to read their args.
	107	+
	108	+outweighs
	109	+A.
	110	+B.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-01-07 13:43:14.129

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Adam Brown

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Cedar Park MT

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+18

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+4

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Cy-Fair Welch Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JAN-FEB Taunt-ology AC v4

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+University of Houston