Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[17]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[21]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[17]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-01-07 13:38:49.313
	1	+2017-01-07 13:38:49.0

Caselist.CitesClass[21]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,146 @@
	1	+I affirm,
	2	+
	3	+
	4	+===I value morality because ought denotes a moral obligation. ===
	5	+
	6	+
	7	+====In order for morality to be act functional, it must be able to recognize subjective differences between individuals. Absent an examination of individual differences, ethics becomes a tool to dominate and is useless as an impartial guide to action. ====
	8	+
	9	+=====Young:=====
	10	+**Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1990. Print. CM**
	11	+**Some feminist and postmodern writers have suggested that a denial of difference structures Western reason**
	12	+**AND**
	13	+**offer a vision of a heterogeneous public that acknowledges and affirms group differences.**
	14	+
	15	+
	16	+====This requires a reconciliation between different group's values. Embracing pluralism is key to acknowledging the social oppression of heterogeneous groups. ====
	17	+
	18	+=====Young 2:=====
	19	+**Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1990. Print. CM**
	20	+**Second,** because it assures a voice for the oppressed** as well as the privileged**
	21	+**AND**
	22	+silenced by cultural imperialism. Group representation in the public facilitates such expression.
	23	+
	24	+
	25	+====Multiple impacts: ====
	26	+
	27	+=====Controls the internal link to any ethical system- ethics cannot operate if they exclude voices because they would be incomplete and arbitrary. Arbitrariness is a side constraint on ethical theories, because if they could exclude voices they would never be able to be a guide to action because they wouldn't be able to prescribe consistent rules. =====
	28	+
	29	+=====Excluding voices reinforces hierarchies which inherently privileges the have's in society over the have not's=====
	30	+
	31	+=====AND=====
	32	+
	33	+=====voices in the political system is the only way to create ethical rules.=====
	34	+
	35	+
	36	+===Thus the standard is resisting structural violence.===
	37	+Independently prefer:
	38	+
	39	+
	40	+====Social Ontology - Ideal theory fails to recognize that agency is political – focusing on a pre-given subject ignores our constitutive social relations. An ontology that recognizes differentiation in subjectivity is key. ====
	41	+
	42	+=====BUTLER: =====
	43	+(Judith Butler. 1992. "Continent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of "Postmodernism" Feminists Theorize the Political)
	44	+"In a sense, the subject is constituted through an exclusion and differentiation,
	45	+AND
	46	+the point in which it is claimed to be prior to politics itself."
	47	+
	48	+
	49	+====Motivation - Ideal theory can't guide action since its starting point has diverged from the descriptive model of the real world. Non-ideal theory is key for ethical motivation. ====
	50	+
	51	+=====MILLS:=====
	52	+Charles W. Mills, "Ideal Theory" as Ideology, 2005
	53	+("Ideal Theory" as Ideology CHARLES W. MILLS 2004 UH-DD, http://www.douglasficek.com/teaching/phi-102/mills.pdf)
	54	+"A first possible argument might be the simple denial that moral theory should have
	55	+AND
	56	+? Isn't this, on the face of it, just completely implausible?"
	57	+
	58	+
	59	+====Observation: Universities are the most important site of first amendment activity. ====
	60	+
	61	+=====Goodman 5:=====
	62	+**( S. Mark Goodman, Michael C. Hiestand, Student Press Law Center 2005 WL 2736314 (U.S.) (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) Supreme Court of the United States. Margaret L. HOSTY, Jeni S. Porche, and Steven P. Barba, Petitioners, v. Patricia CARTER, Respondent. No. 05-377. October 20, 2005. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Brief of Amici Curiae Student Press Law Center, Associated Collegiate Press, College Media Advisers, Community College Journalism Association, Society for Collegiate Journalists, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, American Society of Newspaper Editors, National Newspaper Association, Newspaper Association of America, Society of Professional Journalists, Associated Press Managing Editors, College Newspaper Business and Advertising Managers, National Federation of Press Women, National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association and the Independent Press Association/Campus Journalism Project in Support of Petition of Margaret L. Hosty, Jeni S. Porche, and Steven P. Barba for Writ of Certiorari Of Counsel: S. Mark Goodman, Michael C. Hiestand, Student Press Law Center, 1101 Wilson Blvd., Ste 1100, Arlington, VA 22209-2211, (703) 807-1904. Richard M. Goehler, (Counsel of Record), Frost Brown Todd LLC, 2200 PNC Center, 201 East Fifth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, (513) 651-6800, Counsel for Amici Curiae.)**
	63	+The University is the paradigmatic "marketplace of ideas," rendering "the vigilant protection
	64	+AND
	65	+venerated balance favoring free and independent thought on America's college and university campuses.
	66	+
	67	+
	68	+===Contention one – co-option ===
	69	+
	70	+
	71	+====Censorship allows our own logic to get co-opted crushing social movements. ====
	72	+
	73	+=====Adler '96:=====
	74	+(Adler, Amy. "Whats Left?: Hate Speech, Pornography, And The Problem For Artistic Expression." California Law Review, Vol. 84, No. 6. December 1996. Web. December 07, 2016. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3481093.)
	75	+The failure of leftist censors to consider the shifting nature of lan-guage may
	76	+AND
	77	+is as if language's infidelity were be- fore the left's very eyes.
	78	+
	79	+
	80	+===Contention two – education===
	81	+
	82	+
	83	+====Prohibitions creates conformist ideology that spills over into creating the mindless student. ====
	84	+
	85	+=====Uelmen '90:=====
	86	+A pro-con discussion of speech codes and free speech Campus Hate Speech Codes Gerald Uelmen https://www.scu.edu/character/resources/campus-hate-speech-codes/ Markkula Center for Applied Ethics
	87	+Additionally, critics assert that the costs of hate speech codes far outweigh their benefits
	88	+AND
	89	+by administrators eager to create egalitarian institutions in a non-egalitarian world.
	90	+
	91	+
	92	+====A~~ Analytic ====
	93	+
	94	+
	95	+====B~~ Analytic ====
	96	+
	97	+
	98	+===Contention three – exitable speech ===
	99	+
	100	+
	101	+====Arbitrary determinations of what speech is good versus whats bad locks trauma of the oppression in the words themselves not to the bad people. ====
	102	+
	103	+=====Butler:=====
	104	+**Butler, Judith (Professor of Rhetoric and Comparative Literature, University of California-Berkeley), Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative, Routledge, 1997.**
	105	+Keeping such terms unsaid and unsayable can also work to lock them in place,
	106	+AND
	107	+~~ originary subordination for another purpose, one whose future is partially open.
	108	+
	109	+
	110	+====Censorship is guaranteed to fail – injurious speech just becomes recirculated. ====
	111	+
	112	+=====Butler ~~2~~:=====
	113	+**"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD**
	114	+"Neither view can account for the restaging and resignifying of offensive utterance, deployments
	115	+AND
	116	+, not yet precisely a context." (Pg. 13-14)
	117	+
	118	+
	119	+====A. Analytic. ====
	120	+
	121	+
	122	+====B. Analytic. ====
	123	+
	124	+
	125	+====C. Analytic. ====
	126	+
	127	+
	128	+===Contention four – journalism===
	129	+
	130	+
	131	+====Censorship of student journalism happening now which discourages government critique.====
	132	+
	133	+=====Schuman '16:=====
	134	+(Rebecca, http://www.slate.com/articles/life/education/2016/12/student_journalists_are_under_threat.html)
	135	+Well, here's some great news to cheer you up: The American student press
	136	+AND
	137	+an entire generation of fledgling journalists who've come up thinking censorship is acceptable.
	138	+
	139	+
	140	+====Censoring college journalism kills engagement. ====
	141	+
	142	+=====LoMonte '16:=====
	143	+**(Frank D., http://www.splc.org/article/2016/12/college-media-threats-report-2016)**
	144	+Frank D. LoMonte, executive director of the SPLC, said, "It
	145	+AND
	146	+. Their rights of free speech and free press must always be guaranteed."

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-01-07 13:38:54.104

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Rebecca Gelfer

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Dulles JZ

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+17

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Cy-Fair Welch Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+JAN-FEB Stacked AC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+University of Houston