Changes for page Cy-Fair Welch Aff

Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:34

From version < 122.1 >
edited by Tess Welch
on 2017/05/01 21:52
To version < 81.1 >
edited by Tess Welch
on 2017/01/08 16:04
< >
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[26]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,111 +1,0 @@
1 -====First, our body is a condensed history of millions of years of mutations, and we continue to be vulnerable to the random laws of genetics. Random mutations create the inevitable conditions for evolution and explain the diversity of life. ====
2 -
3 -=====Haviland ~~1~~:=====
4 -Haviland, William A. Anthropology: The Human Challenge, 15th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2017. ~~Yuzu~~. UH-DD
5 -"At the level of an
6 -AND
7 -for some new adaptation." (Pg. 41)
8 -
9 -Implications:
10 -A) Analytic
11 -B) Analytic
12 -C) Analytic
13 -D) Analytic
14 -E) Analytic
15 -F) Analytic
16 -
17 -====The evolution of our brains created the conditions for cultural adaptation. No longer did we have to wait generations to prevail environmental pressures. Through culture, we could overcome challenges that were not possible from a purely biology standpoint. ====
18 -
19 -=====Haviland ~~2~~: =====
20 -Haviland, William A. Anthropology: The Human Challenge, 15th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2017. ~~Yuzu~~. UH-DD
21 -"In the quest for
22 -AND
23 -and cultural change." (Pg. 167-168)
24 -
25 -Implications:
26 -A. Analytic
27 -B. Analytic
28 -C. Analytic
29 -D. Analytic
30 -
31 -====And, if cultural conflict is inevitable, the goal of intercultural politics is not to eradicate conflict, but to channel conflict in ways productive to intercultural coexistence. This requires an agonistic commitment, which reframes the other as an advisory instead of an enemy. ====
32 -
33 -=====Mouffe ~~1~~:=====
34 -"On the Political" by Chantal Mouffe 2000 UH-DD
35 -"Once the theoretical terrain
36 -AND
37 -in an ongoing confrontation." (Pg. 101-102)
38 -
39 -====Thus, the standard is promoting agonistic democracy. To clarify, the standard is concerned with following the constitutive procedures of agonistic democracy, not ends. ====
40 -
41 -=====Mouffe ~~2~~:=====
42 -On the Political" by Chantal Mouffe 2000 UH-DD
43 -"To avoid any confusion,
44 -AND
45 -for conflicting interpretations." (Pg. 120-121)
46 -
47 -===Contention One – ===
48 -
49 -====A – Analytic.====
50 -
51 -====B – Injurious speech subjugates agents but paradoxically marks them as socially recognizable within language. This presents a site of linguistic reversibility. Since language is temporal, we can reverse the norms that make injurious speech possible. ====
52 -
53 -=====BUTLER ~~1~~:=====
54 -"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD
55 -"One is not simply fixed by the name that one is called. In being called an injurious name, one is derogated and demeaned. But the name holds out another possibility as well: by being called a name~~d~~, one is also, paradoxically, given a certain possibility for social existence, initiated into a temporal life of language that exceeds the prior purposes that animate that call. Thus the injurious address may appear to fix or paralyze the one it hails, but it may also produce an unexpected and enabling response. If to be addressed is to be interpellated, then the offensive call runs the risk of inaugurating a subject in speech who comes to use language to counter the offensive call. When the address is injurious, it works its force upon the one it injures. What is this force, and how might we come to understand its faultlines?" (Pg. 2)
56 -
57 -Analytic
58 -
59 -===Contention Two – ===
60 -
61 -====A - Hate speech is different from hate crimes ====
62 -
63 -=====Kamier:=====
64 -Kaminer Wendy (author, lawyer, journalist at the Atlantic and civil libertarian) "Why We Need to Tolerate Hate" Nov. 28 2012, The Atlantic, http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/11/why-we-need-to-tolerate-hate/265654/ KA
65 -Decorate your house
66 -AND
67 -business of the state.
68 -
69 -====B - Agonism requires the diversity of beliefs to allow engagement.====
70 -
71 -=====Mouffe ~~3~~:=====
72 -(Chantal Mouffe, Professor at the Department of Political Science of the Institute for Advanced Studies. June 2000. "The Democratic Paradox")\
73 -I submit that this
74 -AND
75 -thinking is invaluable.
76 -
77 -===Contention Three – ===
78 -
79 -====Censorship allows our own logic to get co-opted crushing social movements.====
80 -
81 -=====Adler '96:=====
82 -(Adler, Amy. "Whats Left?: Hate Speech, Pornography, And The Problem For Artistic Expression." California Law Review, Vol. 84, No. 6. December 1996. Web. December 07, 2016. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3481093.)
83 -The failure of leftist
84 -AND
85 -left's very eyes.
86 -
87 -====Censorship is an issue of interpretation. This ensures cooption. ====
88 -
89 -=====BUTLER ~~2~~:=====
90 -"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD
91 -"Indeed, recent efforts
92 -AND
93 -the moment of utterance." (Pg. 13)
94 -
95 -====Censorship only reifies the reigning hegemonic ideology. ====
96 -
97 -=====Ward '90:=====
98 -Ward '90 (Dr. David V, ~~Phil Prof at Widener University,~~ "Library Trends," Philosophical Issues in Censorship and Intellectual Freedom, Vol 39, No 1 and 2, 1990, pg 86-87)
99 -
100 -Second, even if the opinion
101 -AND
102 -the expressions of others.
103 -
104 -===Underview===
105 -
106 -====Arguments about construction of certain identities can never turn the framework- that misses the goal of agonism. Identity politics homogenizes and turns their identity.====
107 -Mouffe 4 ~~Chantal Mouffe, Professor at the Department of Political Science of the Institute for Advanced Studies. June 2000. "The Democratic Paradox"~~
108 -
109 -A well-functioning democracy
110 -AND
111 -basis of civility.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-02-02 19:52:45.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Cathy Terrace
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Earl Warren NO
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -21
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -5
Team
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Cy-Fair Welch Aff
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -JAN-FEB Radical Democracy AC
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -University of Houston
Caselist.CitesClass[27]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,7 +1,0 @@
1 -Anti-blackness is not an ontological antagonism~-~~-~-conflict is inevitable in politics, but does not have to be demarcated around whiteness and blackness.
2 -
3 -Peter Hudson 13, Political Studies Department, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg , South Africa, has been on the editorial board of the Africa Perspective: The South African Journal of Sociology and Theoria: A Journal of Political and Social Theory and Transformation, and is a member of the Johannesburg Workshop in Theory and Criticism, The state and the colonial unconscious, Social Dynamics: A journal of African studies, 2013
4 -
5 -Thus the self-same/other
6 -AND
7 -based on a determinate identity.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-02-02 19:52:45.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Cathy Terrace
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Earl Warren NO
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -21
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -5
Team
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Cy-Fair Welch Aff
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2 A2 Blackness is Ontological
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -University of Houston
Caselist.CitesClass[28]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,108 +1,0 @@
1 -First, our body is a condensed history of millions of years of mutations, and we continue to be vulnerable to the random laws of genetics. Random mutations create the inevitable conditions for evolution and explain the diversity of life.
2 -Haviland ~1~:
3 -
4 -Haviland, William A. Anthropology: The Human Challenge, 15th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2017. ~Yuzu~. UH-DD
5 -"At the level of an
6 -AND
7 -for some new adaptation." (Pg. 41)
8 -
9 -Implications:
10 -A) Analytic
11 -B) Analytic
12 -C) Analytic
13 -D) Analytic
14 -E) Analytic
15 -F) Analytic
16 -
17 -The evolution of our brains created the conditions for cultural adaptation. No longer did we have to wait generations to prevail environmental pressures. Through culture, we could overcome challenges that were not possible from a purely biology standpoint.
18 -Haviland ~2~:
19 -
20 -Haviland, William A. Anthropology: The Human Challenge, 15th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2017. ~Yuzu~. UH-DD
21 -"In the quest for
22 -AND
23 -and cultural change." (Pg. 167-168)
24 -
25 -Implications:
26 -A. Analytic
27 -B. Analytic
28 -C. Analytic
29 -D. Analytic
30 -
31 -And, if cultural conflict is inevitable, the goal of intercultural politics is not to eradicate conflict, but to channel conflict in ways productive to intercultural coexistence. This requires an agonistic commitment, which reframes the other as an advisory instead of an enemy.
32 -Mouffe ~1~:
33 -
34 -"On the Political" by Chantal Mouffe 2000 UH-DD
35 -"Once the theoretical terrain
36 -AND
37 -in an ongoing confrontation." (Pg. 101-102)
38 -
39 -Thus, the standard is promoting agonistic democracy. To clarify, the standard is concerned with following the constitutive procedures of agonistic democracy, not ends.
40 -Mouffe ~2~:
41 -
42 -On the Political" by Chantal Mouffe 2000 UH-DD
43 -"To avoid any confusion,
44 -AND
45 -for conflicting interpretations." (Pg. 120-121)
46 -
47 -Contention One –
48 -
49 -A – Analytic.
50 -B – Injurious speech subjugates agents but paradoxically marks them as socially recognizable within language. This presents a site of linguistic reversibility. Since language is temporal, we can reverse the norms that make injurious speech possible.
51 -BUTLER ~1~:
52 -
53 -"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD
54 -"One is not simply =
55 -AND
56 -understand its faultlines?" (Pg. 2)
57 -
58 -Analytic
59 -
60 -Contention Two –
61 -
62 -Agonism requires the diversity of beliefs to allow engagement.
63 -Mouffe ~3~:
64 -
65 -(Chantal Mouffe, Professor at the Department of Political Science of the Institute for Advanced Studies. June 2000. "The Democratic Paradox")\
66 -I submit that this
67 -AND
68 -thinking is invaluable.
69 -
70 -Contention Three –
71 -
72 -Censorship only reifies the reigning hegemonic ideology.
73 -Ward '90:
74 -
75 -Ward '90 (Dr. David V, ~Phil Prof at Widener University,~ "Library Trends," Philosophical Issues in Censorship and Intellectual Freedom, Vol 39, No 1 and 2, 1990, pg 86-87)
76 -
77 -Second, even if the opinion
78 -AND
79 -the expressions of others.
80 -
81 -Censorship is an issue of interpretation. This ensures cooption.
82 -BUTLER ~2~:
83 -
84 -"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD
85 -"Indeed, recent efforts
86 -AND
87 -the moment of utterance." (Pg. 13)
88 -
89 -
90 -Underview
91 -
92 -The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best meets their burden under a truth testing paradigm. Analytic
93 -Prefer:
94 -
95 -Standards of goodness for any activity, like debate, inevitably collapse to the intrinsic form. The ends of debate are inseparable from the rules that govern it. This alone explains the possibility of binding standards.
96 -BOYLE and LAVIN:
97 -Boyle, Matthew and Douglas Lavin. 2010. Goodness and desire. In Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good, ed. Sergio Tenenbaum. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 32-33. DD
98 -"A certain standard of goodness for a thing follows inevitably from its belonging to
99 -AND
100 -an arbitrary claim, but a premise up for debate under truth testing.
101 -
102 -Outweighs:
103 -A. Analytic
104 -B. Analytic
105 -C. Analytic
106 -D. Analytic
107 -
108 -Analytic
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-02-02 19:53:22.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Arun Sharma, Neel Yereni, Daniel Conrad
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Cedar Park MG
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -22
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Quarters
Team
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Cy-Fair Welch Aff
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -JAN-FEB Radical Democracy AC v2
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -University of Houston
Caselist.CitesClass[29]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,25 +1,0 @@
1 -A) Interp - All debaters with awareness and access to the NDCA 16-17 LD Wiki, located at “hsld.debatecoaches.org”, must disclose all broken positions on said wiki at least 30 minutes before the round or provide their own accessible contact information. All disclosure must occur on one’s own wiki page including the tags citation, and first and last three words of each card.
2 -
3 -B) Violation -
4 -
5 -C) Reasons to Prefer -
6 -
7 -1. small school inclusivity
8 -
9 -Bietz ’10:
10 -Bietz, Mike. “The Case for Public Case Disclosure.” NFL Rostrum, Vol. 84, Issue 9. May 2010. https://nationalforensicleague.org/DownloadHandler.ashx?File=/userdocs/publications/05-201020Complete20Rostrum.pdf
11 -Big teams already get
12 -AND
13 -have the resources to travel as much.
14 -
15 -2. Educational benefits
16 -
17 - a)
18 -
19 - b)
20 -
21 -3. Engagability
22 -
23 -D) Implication
24 -
25 - (changes)
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-02-03 05:28:19.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -All
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -All
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -24
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -3
Team
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Cy-Fair Welch Aff
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -1 General Disclosure Interp
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Caselist.CitesClass[30]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,101 +1,0 @@
1 -"If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter"
2 -
3 -It is because I agree with one of our founding fathers, George Washington, I affirm,
4 -
5 -“Resolved: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech.”
6 -
7 -For further clarification of the round, I’ll define the following terms through Oxford dictionary. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/restrict https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/any https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/ought
8 -
9 -First, any is defined as “Used to refer to one or some of a thing or number of things, no matter how much or how many:”
10 -
11 -Second, restrict is defined as “Put a limit on; keep under control:”
12 -
13 -And Lastly, ought is defined as “Used to indicate duty or correctness, typically when criticizing someone's actions:”
14 -
15 -
16 -I value morality due to the evaluative term ought since morality is the best way to judge an action’s innate goodness or correctness.
17 -Analytic
18 -
19 -Public colleges and universities are regulated by the government – which has to make tradeoffs in order to act since every action will always benefit some and harm others.
20 -Gary Woller elaborates:
21 -Gary Woller (Professor at Brigham Young University). “Policy Currents.” A Forum on the Role of Environmental Ethics. “An Overview by Gary Woller.” 1997. CM
22 -Moreover, virtually all
23 -AND
24 -policy in a democracy.
25 -
26 -The only way policies can pass is through an adoption of rule utilitarianism. This means that my framework sets up that we should evaluate actions based on whether or not they are a good rule on balance.
27 -Analytic
28 -
29 -Contention One – Unabridged freedom of speech on college campuses is essential
30 -
31 -Subpoint A) The right to free speech forms the basis for other rights which are key to fight oppression. There’s no guarantee that the legal precedent of letting colleges cherry-pick when rights are and aren’t protected will not be applied in other cases leading to a slippery slope of rights violations.
32 -The American Civil Liberties Union explains:
33 -ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union), “Freedom of Expression,” ACLU Position Paper, 2016.
34 -
35 -The ACLU has often
36 -AND
37 -example, are not constitutionally protected.
38 -
39 -Subpoint B) Ethics arise through shared discourse – this means free speech is key to having morals and moral obligations. The dialogue from unrestricted speech allows for everyone to develop a comprehensive understanding of morality.
40 -Dr. Haste illustrates in 1998:
41 -Helen Haste, Ph.D., 1998 Communitarianism and the Social Construction of Morality, http://tigger.uic.edu/~lnucci/MoralEd/articles/haste.html
42 -
43 -Communitarian thinkers start from a
44 -AND
45 -object rather than a person.
46 -
47 -Analytic
48 -
49 -Subpoint C) Bans presume objective knowledge- unpopular opinions might be true so suppression only causes knowledge deficits.
50 -Professor Dry argues:
51 -Dry ’94 (Murray, Professor of Political Science at Middlebury College, “FREE SPEECH IN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY AND ITS RELATION TO AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: A CONSIDERATION OF MILL, MEIKLEJOHN, AND PLATO,” Constitutional Commentary, Vol 11:18, 1994, pg 81-100, https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/167054/11_01_Dry.pdf?sequence=1andisAllowed=y, TW)
52 -
53 -In the second case, the received
54 -AND
55 -proposal "is practically impossible. "23
56 -
57 -Discourse is key to challenging eco-chambers that knowledge deficits create, as well as stopping regimes of truth from controlling society.
58 -Dungey clarifies:
59 -Dungey ’01 (Nicholas, PhD graduate from the University of California and a current lecturer in Political Science there, “(Re)Turning Derrida to Heidegger: Being-with-Others as Primordial Politics,” Polity, Vol. 33, No. 3 (Spring, 2001), pp. 455-477, https://www.jstor.org/stable/3235444, TW)
60 -
61 -The desire for communal
62 -AND
63 -to separate and isolate.
64 -
65 -Analytic
66 -
67 -
68 -Contention Two – Restrictions of constitutionally protected speech fail.
69 -
70 -Subpoint A) Restrictions of free speech on college campuses have empirically failed and were counter-productive.
71 -Friedersdork writes in 2015:
72 -Friedersdorf, 2015 (Conor Staff Writer at The Atlantic “The Lessons of Bygone Free-Speech Fights.” The Atlantic. 10 December 2015. Online. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/12/what-student-activists-can-learn-from-bygone-free-speech-fights/419178/)
73 -
74 -More than 20 years ago,
75 -AND
76 -and civil-liberties community.”
77 -
78 -The impact of Friedersdork is twofold:
79 -1 - Analytic
80 -2 - Analytic
81 -
82 -
83 -Subpoint B) Arbitrary determinations of what speech is good versus what’s bad locks trauma of the oppression in the words themselves not to the bad people.
84 -Judith Butler concludes:
85 -Butler, Judith (Professor of Rhetoric and Comparative Literature, University of California-Berkeley), Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative, Routledge, 1997.
86 -
87 -Keeping such terms unsaid
88 -AND
89 -future is partially open.
90 -
91 -Subpoint C) In order to pass a norm of censorship, one has to circulate what they’re censoring – this creates a perpetual and inevitable cycle of recirculation with the only way to break it is through free speech.
92 -Judith Butler emphasizes:
93 -“Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity” by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD'
94 -
95 -“Neither view can account
96 -AND
97 -not yet precisely a context.” (Pg. 13-14)

98 -
99 -Analytic
100 -
101 -For all of the above reasons and more, I urge an affirmative ballot and am now open for cross-examination.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-02-03 23:55:45.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Jennifer Camacho
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Winston Churchill BY
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -25
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -1
Team
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Cy-Fair Welch Aff
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -JAN-FEB Rule Util AC
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Colleyville
Caselist.CitesClass[31]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,7 +1,0 @@
1 -If the structure of recognition is anti-black, then the aff’s radical form of resistance has no solvency. People become passive because nothing they do can change the structure of recognition and radical resistance seems impractical.
2 -Wilderson '10:
3 -“We’re trying to destroy the world” Anti-Blackness and Police Violence After Ferguson An Interview with Frank B. Wilderson, III This is a transciption of an radio interview with Frank B. Wilderson, III taped in October of 2014, in the midst of the ongoing anti-police struggles taking place in Ferguson, MO. Wilderson is in conversation with IMIXWHATILIKE hosts Jared Ball, Todd Steven Burroughs and Dr. Hate. An audio recording of the interview can be found under the title “Irreconcilable Anti-Blackness and Police Violence” on the show’s website: http://imixwhatilike.org/2014/10/01/frankwildersonandantiblackness-2/
4 -
5 -“Normally people are not
6 -AND
7 -on with us.’” (9)
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-02-03 23:55:46.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Jennifer Camacho
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Winston Churchill BY
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -25
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -1
Team
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Cy-Fair Welch Aff
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2 A2 Unflinching Paradigmatic Analysis vSHORT
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Colleyville
Caselist.CitesClass[32]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,99 +1,0 @@
1 -For further clarification of the round, I’ll define the following terms through Oxford dictionary. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/restrict https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/any https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/ought
2 -
3 -First, any is defined as “Used to refer to one or some of a thing or number of things, no matter how much or how many:”
4 -
5 -Second, restrict is defined as “Put a limit on; keep under control:”
6 -
7 -And Lastly, ought is defined as “Used to indicate duty or correctness, typically when criticizing someone's actions:”
8 -
9 -I value morality due to the evaluative term ought since morality is the best way to judge an action’s innate goodness or correctness.
10 -Analytic
11 -
12 -Public colleges and universities are regulated by the government – which has to make tradeoffs in order to act since every action will always benefit some and harm others.
13 -Gary Woller elaborates:
14 -Gary Woller (Professor at Brigham Young University). “Policy Currents.” A Forum on the Role of Environmental Ethics. “An Overview by Gary Woller.” 1997. CM
15 -Moreover, virtually all
16 -AND
17 -policy in a democracy.
18 -
19 -The only way policies can pass is through an adoption of rule utilitarianism. This means that my framework sets up that we should evaluate actions based on whether or not they are a good rule on balance.
20 -Analytic
21 -
22 -Contention One – Unabridged freedom of speech on college campuses is essential
23 -
24 -Subpoint A) The right to free speech forms the basis for other rights which are key to fight oppression. There’s no guarantee that the legal precedent of letting colleges cherry-pick when rights are and aren’t protected will not be applied in other cases leading to a slippery slope of rights violations.
25 -The American Civil Liberties Union explains:
26 -ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union), “Freedom of Expression,” ACLU Position Paper, 2016.
27 -
28 -The ACLU has often
29 -AND
30 -example, are not constitutionally protected.
31 -
32 -Subpoint B) Ethics arise through shared discourse – this means free speech is key to having morals and moral obligations. The dialogue from unrestricted speech allows for everyone to develop a comprehensive understanding of morality.
33 -Dr. Haste illustrates in 1998:
34 -Helen Haste, Ph.D., 1998 Communitarianism and the Social Construction of Morality, http://tigger.uic.edu/~lnucci/MoralEd/articles/haste.html
35 -
36 -Communitarian thinkers start from a
37 -AND
38 -object rather than a person.
39 -
40 -Analytic
41 -
42 -Subpoint C) Bans presume objective knowledge- unpopular opinions might be true so suppression only causes knowledge deficits.
43 -Professor Dry argues:
44 -Dry ’94 (Murray, Professor of Political Science at Middlebury College, “FREE SPEECH IN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY AND ITS RELATION TO AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: A CONSIDERATION OF MILL, MEIKLEJOHN, AND PLATO,” Constitutional Commentary, Vol 11:18, 1994, pg 81-100, https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/167054/11_01_Dry.pdf?sequence=1andisAllowed=y, TW)
45 -
46 -In the second case, the received
47 -AND
48 -proposal "is practically impossible. "23
49 -
50 -Discourse is key to challenging eco-chambers that knowledge deficits create, as well as stopping regimes of truth from controlling society.
51 -Dungey clarifies:
52 -Dungey ’01 (Nicholas, PhD graduate from the University of California and a current lecturer in Political Science there, “(Re)Turning Derrida to Heidegger: Being-with-Others as Primordial Politics,” Polity, Vol. 33, No. 3 (Spring, 2001), pp. 455-477, https://www.jstor.org/stable/3235444, TW)
53 -
54 -The desire for communal
55 -AND
56 -to separate and isolate.
57 -
58 -Analytic
59 -
60 -Contention Two – Restrictions of constitutionally protected speech fail.
61 -
62 -Subpoint A) Restrictions of free speech on college campuses have empirically failed and were counter-productive.
63 -Friedersdork writes in 2015:
64 -Friedersdorf, 2015 (Conor Staff Writer at The Atlantic “The Lessons of Bygone Free-Speech Fights.” The Atlantic. 10 December 2015. Online. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/12/what-student-activists-can-learn-from-bygone-free-speech-fights/419178/)
65 -
66 -More than 20 years ago,
67 -AND
68 -and civil-liberties community.”
69 -
70 -The impact of Friedersdork is twofold:
71 -1 - Analytic
72 -2 - Analytic
73 -
74 -Subpoint B) Arbitrary determinations of what speech is good versus what’s bad locks trauma of the oppression in the words themselves not to the bad people.
75 -Judith Butler concludes:
76 -Butler, Judith (Professor of Rhetoric and Comparative Literature, University of California-Berkeley), Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative, Routledge, 1997.
77 -
78 -Keeping such terms unsaid
79 -AND
80 -future is partially open.
81 -
82 -Subpoint C) In order to pass a norm of censorship, one has to circulate what they’re censoring – this creates a perpetual and inevitable cycle of recirculation with the only way to break it is through free speech.
83 -Judith Butler emphasizes:
84 -“Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity” by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD'
85 -
86 -“Neither view can account
87 -AND
88 -not yet precisely a context.” (Pg. 13-14)

89 -
90 -Analytic
91 -
92 -
93 -Contention Three - Free speech cuts both ways – instead of silencing through speech codes, hate speech should be responded with deliberation.
94 -Piser ’16:
95 -Piser ’16 (Karina, “Trump’s Bigotry Tests the Limits of Free Speech,” Aljazeera America, January 2016, http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2016/1/trumps-bigotry-tests-the-limits-of-free-speech.html, TW)
96 -
97 -Stomaching hateful views is
98 -AND
99 -the right to drown them out.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-02-05 16:10:35.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Jane Boyd
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Westwood AD
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -26
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -4
Team
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Cy-Fair Welch Aff
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -JAN-FEB Rule Util AC v2
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Colleyville
Caselist.CitesClass[33]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,112 +1,0 @@
1 -Prefer non-ideal theory:
2 -1. Social Ontology: Ideal theory fails to recognize that agency is political – focusing on a pre-given subject ignores our constitutive social relations. An ontology that recognizes differentiation in subjectivity is key.
3 -BUTLER:
4 -(Judith Butler. 1992. “Continent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of “Postmodernism” Feminists Theorize the Political)
5 -“In a sense, the subject
6 -AND
7 -be prior to politics itself.”
8 -
9 -
10 -
11 -
12 -2. Standpoint Epistemology: Ideal theory strips away questions of particularities and isolates a universal feature of agents. This normalizes a single experience and epistemically skews ethical theorizing.
13 -MILLS 3:
14 - (“Ideal Theory” as Ideology CHARLES W. MILLS 2004 UH-DD, http://www.douglasficek.com/teaching/phi-102/mills.pdf)
15 -“The crucial common claim—whether
16 -AND
17 -concepts arrived at may be misleading.” (175)
18 -
19 -
20 -
21 -Embracing pluralism is key to acknowledging the social oppression of heterogeneous groups.
22 -Young:
23 -
24 - Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1990. Print. CM
25 -Second, because it
26 -AND
27 -public facilitates such expression.
28 -
29 -Multiple impacts:
30 -1 - ANALYTIC
31 -2 - ANALYTIC
32 -
33 -Thus the standard is resisting structural violence.
34 -
35 -Advantage 1 – Radicalized Racism
36 -Speech codes just turn outspoken bigots into closeted ones, draining support from protest movements because the problem is buried under speech codes, and as a result less visible to the public.
37 -
38 -ACLU:
39 -ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union), “Hate Speech on Campus,” 2016.
40 -Many universities, under
41 -AND
42 -inclusive approaches to all subject matter.
43 -
44 -And free speech cuts both ways – instead of silencing through speech codes, hate speech should be responded with deliberation
45 -Piser ’16:
46 -Piser ’16 (Karina, “Trump’s Bigotry Tests the Limits of Free Speech,” Aljazeera America, January 2016, http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2016/1/trumps-bigotry-tests-the-limits-of-free-speech.html, TW)
47 -Stomaching hateful views
48 -AND
49 -to drown them out.
50 -
51 -Letting people say what they want lets America OPEN THEIR EYES and DO SOMETHING
52 -Burke ’16:
53 -Burke ’16 (Cathy, “Joe Biden: ‘I Want to Thank’ Trump For Unmasking America’s Racism,” News Mask, March 01 2016, http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/joe-biden-thanks-donald-trump-exposing/2016/03/01/id/716945/, TW)
54 -Vice President Joe Biden
55 -AND
56 -deals going on," he added.
57 -
58 -Increasing prevalence of censorship culture and political correctness cedes the political - that’s why trump got elected.
59 -Soave ’16:
60 -Soave ’16 (Robby, Associate editor at reason.com with primary areas of interest in college news, education policy, criminal justice reform and television, “Trump Won Because Leftist Political Correctness Inspired a Terrifying Backlash,” November 2016, , http://reason.com/blog/2016/11/09/trump-won-because-leftist-political-corr, TW)
61 -
62 -Trump won because of
63 -AND
64 -he isn't afraid to speak his.
65 -
66 -
67 -Advantage 2 – Exictable Speech
68 -Injurious speech is specifically conditioned by a history of social normalization. Strategies that account for the damage of the utterance in the moment cannot solve for the violence that precedes and follows the moment.
69 -Butler:
70 -BUTLER: “Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity” by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD
71 -As utterances, they
72 -AND
73 -instance of utterance.” (Pg. 3)
74 -
75 -Implications-
76 -1. Linguistic Reversibility- injurious speech subjugates agents but paradoxically marks them as socially recognizable within language. This presents a site of linguistic reversibility. Since language is temporal, we can reverse the norms that make injurious speech possible.
77 -Butler 2:
78 -BUTLER 2: “Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity” by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD
79 -“One is not
80 -AND
81 -we come to understand its faultlines?” (Pg. 2)
82 -
83 -2. Censorship is guaranteed failure~-~- It prevents survival strategies and it requires using injurious speech in its own critique. This ensures recirculation.
84 -Butler 3:
85 -BUTLER 3: “Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity” by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD
86 -“Neither view can
87 -AND
88 -performance of hate speech.
89 -
90 -Impacts:
91 -A. Analytic
92 -B. Analytic
93 -C. Analytic
94 -
95 -Underview
96 -First - Public colleges only have jurisdiction over specific freedoms they could limit
97 -Byrne ’06:
98 -Byrne ‘06 (Peter J, Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, “Constitutional Academic Freedom After Grutter: Getter Real about the ‘Four Freedoms’ of a University,” University of Colorado Law Review, 2006, Volume 77, pg 929-953, http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1443andcontext=facpub, TW)
99 -
100 -In a concurring opinion,
101 -AND
102 -valuable scholarship and teaching could exist.
103 -
104 -ANALYTIC
105 -
106 -Second – Restrictions of free speech on college campuses have empirically failed and were counter-productive.
107 -Friedersdork writes in 2015:
108 -Friedersdorf, 2015 (Conor Staff Writer at The Atlantic “The Lessons of Bygone Free-Speech Fights.” The Atlantic. 10 December 2015. Online. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/12/what-student-activists-can-learn-from-bygone-free-speech-fights/419178/)
109 -
110 -More than 20 years
111 -AND
112 -and civil-liberties community.”
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-02-05 16:33:32.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Preston Stolte
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Keller MH
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -27
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Doubles
Team
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Cy-Fair Welch Aff
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -JAN-FEB Radical Racists AC
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Colleyville
Caselist.CitesClass[34]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,123 +1,0 @@
1 -I affirm,
2 -
3 -I value morality because ought denotes a moral obligation.
4 -
5 -Morality requires a reconciliation between different group’s values. Embracing pluralism is key to acknowledging the social oppression of heterogeneous groups.
6 -
7 -Young 1:
8 -Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1990. Print. CM
9 -
10 -Second, because it
11 -AND
12 -facilitates such expression.
13 -
14 -Multiple impacts:
15 -1. Analytic
16 -
17 -2. Analytic
18 -
19 -3. Analytic
20 -
21 -
22 -Ideal theory can’t guide action since its starting point has diverged from the descriptive model of the real world. Non-ideal theory is key for ethical motivation.
23 -
24 -MILLS:
25 -Charles W. Mills, “Ideal Theory” as Ideology, 2005
26 -(“Ideal Theory” as Ideology CHARLES W. MILLS 2004 UH-DD, http://www.douglasficek.com/teaching/phi-102/mills.pdf)
27 -
28 -“A first possible argument
29 -AND
30 -just completely implausible?”
31 -
32 -Thus the standard is resisting structural violence.
33 -
34 -
35 -The affirmative engages in an intersectional analysis of homelessness. This accounts for structural violence and material identity politics. Failure to meet both is a disad to their method.
36 -
37 -McCARTHY:
38 -Lindsey McCarthy, “People Homelessness and identity: a critical review of the literature and theory” Place and Policy Online (2013): 7/1, pp. 46-58. // UH-DD
39 -
40 -“For the most part,
41 -AND
42 -for social justice.” (48-49)
43 -
44 -This also justifies the AFF needs to focus on a specific group intersection of the resolution. Anything else contributes to a homogenizing homeless identity politic that ignores intersections of individual agency. How we represent homelessness has implications on whether we can address the problem.
45 -
46 -McCARTHY 2:
47 -Lindsey McCarthy, “People Homelessness and identity: a critical review of the literature and theory” Place and Policy Online (2013): 7/1, pp. 46-58. // UH-DD
48 -“The term, 'homeless identity'
49 -AND
50 -of ‘homeless identities’.” (46-48)
51 -
52 -
53 -Inherency - Discrimination is still legal
54 -
55 -Badger ’16:
56 -Badger Emily (Reporter for The Washington Post), “A pervasive form of housing discrimination that’s still legal” The Washington Post, August 2 2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/08/03/a-pervasive-form-of-housing-discrimination-thats-still-legal/?utm_term=.21130d56eb22 KA
57 -
58 -Washington, D.C., Chicago,
59 -AND
60 -the bill, 6 to 1.
61 -
62 -
63 -I affirm the right to housing as a negative right - in that the United States ought to guarantee a right to housing absent of racial, social, or economic backgrounds.
64 -
65 -Alexander 15:
66 -Lisa T. Alexander, Occupying the Constitutional Right to Housing, 94 Neb. L. Rev. 245 (2015) Available at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol94/iss2/2, DD
67 -
68 -America’s failure to
69 -AND
70 -right to housing.
71 -
72 -Impacts
73 -A. Analytic
74 -B. Analytic
75 -C. Analytic
76 -D. Analytic
77 -
78 -
79 -
80 -Affirm:
81 -1. Segregation wrongly limits choice. Discrimination based on ethnicity structurally excludes people from rightful opportunities.
82 -
83 -YOUNG 2:
84 -Iris Marion Young, “Inclusion and Democracy”, Oxford Political Theory, 2000 // UH-DD
85 -
86 -“Wrongly limits choice
87 -AND
88 -racially marked groups.” (205)
89 -
90 -
91 -
92 -2. Racial segregation is cyclical. Communities are structurally set up to fail, which further rationalizes segregation and violence by marking others as racially inferior.
93 -
94 -YOUNG 3:
95 -Iris Marion Young, “Inclusion and Democracy”, Oxford Political Theory, 2000 // UH-DD
96 -
97 -“Reproduces structures of
98 -AND
99 -service is poor.” (205-207)
100 -
101 -Impacts:
102 -A. Analytic
103 -B. Analytic
104 -
105 -
106 -3. Racial segregation obscures white privilege. Spatial exclusion allows white people to construct their privilege as invisible.
107 -
108 -YOUNG 4:
109 -Iris Marion Young, “Inclusion and Democracy”, Oxford Political Theory, 2000 // UH-DD
110 -
111 -“Obscures the privilege
112 -AND
113 -most abstract terms.” (208)
114 -
115 -
116 -4. Desegregation is prerequisite to any reform. It makes possible a political space where marginalized groups can contest and debate policy reforms.
117 -
118 -YOUNG 5:
119 -Iris Marion Young, “Inclusion and Democracy”, Oxford Political Theory, 2000 // UH-DD
120 -
121 -“Impedes political communication
122 -AND
123 -experience and perspective.” (208-210)
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-03-10 13:47:01.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Derek Liles
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Greenhill BZ
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -28
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -1
Team
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Cy-Fair Welch Aff
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -MAR-APR
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -TFA State
Caselist.CitesClass[35]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,129 +1,0 @@
1 -===I value morality because ought denotes a moral obligation. ===
2 -
3 -
4 -====In order for morality to be act functional, it must be able to recognize subjective differences between individuals. Absent an examination of individual differences, ethics becomes a tool to dominate and is useless as an impartial guide to action. ====
5 -
6 -=====Young:=====
7 -**Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1990. Print. CM**
8 -**Some feminist and postmodern writers have suggested that a denial of difference structures Western reason**
9 -**AND**
10 -**offer a vision of a heterogeneous public that acknowledges and affirms group differences.**
11 -
12 -
13 -====This requires a reconciliation between different group's values. Embracing pluralism is key to acknowledging the social oppression of heterogeneous groups. ====
14 -
15 -=====Young 2:=====
16 -**Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1990. Print. CM**
17 -**Second,** because it assures a voice for the oppressed** as well as the privileged**
18 -**AND**
19 -silenced by cultural imperialism. Group representation in the public facilitates such expression.
20 -
21 -
22 -====Multiple impacts: ====
23 -
24 -=====Controls the internal link to any ethical system- ethics cannot operate if they exclude voices because they would be incomplete and arbitrary. Arbitrariness is a side constraint on ethical theories, because if they could exclude voices they would never be able to be a guide to action because they wouldn't be able to prescribe consistent rules. =====
25 -
26 -=====Excluding voices reinforces hierarchies which inherently privileges the have's in society over the have not's=====
27 -
28 -=====AND=====
29 -
30 -=====teacher has an obligation to teach their students but a janitor does not. =====
31 -
32 -
33 -====Ideal theory can't guide action since its starting point has diverged from the descriptive model of the real world. Non-ideal theory is key for ethical motivation. ====
34 -
35 -=====MILLS:=====
36 -Charles W. Mills, "Ideal Theory" as Ideology, 2005
37 -("Ideal Theory" as Ideology CHARLES W. MILLS 2004 UH-DD, http://www.douglasficek.com/teaching/phi-102/mills.pdf)
38 -"A first possible argument might be the simple denial that moral theory should have
39 -AND
40 -? Isn't this, on the face of it, just completely implausible?"
41 -
42 -
43 -===Thus the standard is resisting structural violence.===
44 -
45 -
46 -
47 -
48 -===Advantage 1 – Prostitution===
49 -
50 -
51 -====The right to housing is key to end stigmatization against prostitution.====
52 -
53 -=====Gruen and Panichas: =====
54 -Gruen and Panichas '97 (Lori and George E, " Sex, Morality and the Law," Routledge, 1997, https://books.google.com/books?id=lrecCVxsRvwCandpg=PA103andlpg=PA103anddq=prostitutes+ought+to+have+the+right+to+housingandsource=blandots=oT_cvU7Odfandsig=iNDnRlKFtwJKMB9PcsZhq7SDM_Yandhl=enandsa=Xandved=0ahUKEwjR8qfas5LSAhUC4oMKHX0DCMIQ6AEIHzAB~~#v=onepageandq=prostitutes20ought20to20have20the20right20to20housingandf=false, TW)
55 -The second step is to improve the housing situation for prostitutes. The prostitute must
56 -AND
57 -, it would tend to weaken the association between prostitution and organized crime…
58 -
59 -
60 -===Advantage 2 – HIV===
61 -
62 -
63 -====Structural barriers are to blame —- lack of adequate housing spills over into more infection and healthcare. ====
64 -
65 -=====Foucault '01:=====
66 -**Foucault '01. Cedric Foucault, Didir Raoult, Phillippe Brouqi. "Infections in the Homeless." Vol. 1 No. 2. The Lancet. September 2001. // MK **
67 -Homeless people in developed countries have specific problems predisposing them to infectious diseases. Respiratory
68 -AND
69 -on this topic in what seems to be a neglected field of study.
70 -
71 -
72 -====As a result, they are criminalized and socially excluded —- they're stuck in a static identity based on sexual orientation squo insufficiency means try or die. ====
73 -
74 -=====Bagby '14:=====
75 -**BAGBY '14. It's time for Truvada — Atlanta HIV/AIDS activists in praise of PrEP Dyana Bagby June 5, 2014 11:38 pm http://thegavoice.com/time-truvada-atlanta-hivaids-activists-praise-prep/ MK**
76 -In most states in our country (as well as at the federal level),
77 -AND
78 -, discourage HIV testing, and perpetuate stigma against people living with HIV.
79 -
80 -
81 -===Advantage 3 – IPV===
82 -
83 -
84 -====Housing instability is rampant among survivors of IPV====
85 -
86 -=====American Journal of Preventive Medicine:=====
87 -**Pavao, Joanne, Jennifer Alvarez, Nikki Baumrind, Marta Induni, and Rachel Kimerling. "Intimate Partner Violence and Housing Instability." American Journal of Preventive Medicine 32.2 (2007): 143-46. Web. HT**
88 -This cross-sectional study examines the relationship between recent IPV and housing instability among
89 -AND
90 -between IPV and housing instability and the possible associated negative health consequences.'
91 -
92 -
93 -====The right to housing is key to helping end IPV and the issues with housing that stem from it====
94 -
95 -=====Paglione 06 =====
96 -**Giulia Paglione (obtained her LL.M. degree in Public International Law at the University of Oslo, Norway, and her M.A. degree in Philosophy at the University "La Sapienza" of Rome, Italy; she was a Research Fellow at the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly and is currently working as Senior Executive Officer for the asylum section of the Norwegian Immigration Appeals Board). "Domestic Violence and Housing Rights: A Reinterpretation of the Right to Housing." Human Rights Quarterly. February 2006. HW. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20072726 HT**
97 -The CESCR legal security should protect the individual from "forced eviction, harassment and
98 -AND
99 -lacking such protection, in genuine consultation with affected persons and groups."32
100 -
101 -
102 -===Advantage 4 – Racism ===
103 -
104 -
105 -====The right to housing is key since the antithesis to racism is making people feel safe at home. ====
106 -Shutika 11:
107 -**Shutika Debra Lattanzi. 2011. Beyond the Borderland: Migration and Belonging in the United States and Mexico. Los Angeles: University of California Press. http://www.ucpress.edu/book.php?isbn=9780520269590, JN**
108 -Among the places that a person can occupy on a given day, the home
109 -AND
110 -er of belonging, of being deeply and ineluctably connected to a place.
111 -
112 -
113 -===Advantage 5 – Capitalism===
114 -
115 -
116 -====The hegemonic capitalist relies on profits over the basic need for shelter – the right to housing solves ====
117 -
118 -=====Duhalde '13:=====
119 -Duhalde '13 (David, "Capitalism and Poverty: A Socialist Analysis," Democratic Socialists of America, Feb 2013, http://www.dsausa.org/capitalism_and_poverty, TW)
120 -A socialist analysis of homelessness illustrates how the workings of capitalism cause one major aspect
121 -AND
122 -of the superior housing stock in such countries as the Netherlands and Germany.
123 -
124 -
125 -
126 -
127 -UNDERVIEW
128 -
129 -Rights Welfare
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-03-10 23:22:10.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Greg McGee
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Flower Mound KW
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -29
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -4
Team
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Cy-Fair Welch Aff
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -MAR-APR Lay AC
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -TFA State
Caselist.CitesClass[36]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,129 +1,0 @@
1 -=I Kant Believe We Don't Have the Right to Housing =
2 -
3 -
4 -===Framework:===
5 -I value morality since ought denotes a moral obligation
6 -
7 -
8 -====Morality's directives can only be categorically binding if they are constitutive of agency, i.e., if an agent is subject to normative principles by virtue of being an agent. Only a constitutivist account of moral motivation provides agents with non-optional reasons for acting. . ====
9 -
10 -=====Katsafanas^^ ^^=====
11 - Enter a third theory, which attempts to do just that: constitutivism.
12 -AND
13 -for action that arise merely from the fact that one is an agent.
14 -
15 -
16 -====Rationality that is to set and pursue an end, is constitutive of our agency. ====
17 -
18 -=====FERRERO:=====
19 -**(Luca Ferrero, "Constitutivism and the Inescapability of Agency". Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. IV, Jan 12, 2009.(https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/ferrero/www/pubs/ferrero-constitutivism.pdf) Professor of Philosophy, University of Wesconsin at Milwaukee.)**
20 -"The initial appeal of the shmagency objection rests on the impression that there is
21 -AND
22 -they are bestowed and not intrinsic. Only rational agency is unconditionally normative.
23 -
24 -
25 -====And, rational agency commits agents to universalizability. 2 Warrants-====
26 -
27 -
28 -====A. Only universally willing can be self-determined. Anything else justifies that your desire is the law of your will, but then you are not an agent. ====
29 -
30 -=====KORSGAARD: =====
31 -"Self-Constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant" by Christine M. Korsgaard
32 -"The second step is to see that particularistic willing makes it impossible for you
33 -AND
34 -opposed to an action of something within him." (123-124)
35 -
36 -
37 -====B. You cannot set an end without willing it as universal. Anything else justifies that someone could impede your ability to achieve your end in the first place, which also means reason constrains end-based frameworks. ====
38 -
39 -=====SIYAR: =====
40 -**Jamsheed Aiam Siyar: Kant's Conception of Practical Reason. Tufts University, 1999**
41 -"Recall that insofar as I represent a rationally determined end, I represent it
42 -AND
43 -as I represent it as constraining my actions." (80-81)
44 -
45 -
46 -====Thus, the standard is refraining from willing non-universal maxims. ====
47 -To clarify, the standard is not ends based. Consequences are independent of what an agent determines because they are dependent upon things external to the will so only intentions can be rationally determined.
48 -Independently prefer:
49 -
50 -
51 -====A priori cognition is a necessary constraint on experience. ====
52 -
53 -=====KANT:=====
54 -"Critique of Pure Reason" by Immanuel Kant 1787 Translated and Edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood "The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant" re published 1998
55 -"Now it is easy to show that in human cognition there actually are such
56 -AND
57 -is the case, there is such a thing as a priori knowledge.
58 -
59 -
60 -====A priori knowledge requires universally willing. ====
61 -
62 -=====KANT 2:=====
63 -**"Critique of Pure Reason" by Immanuel Kant 1787 Translated and Edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood "The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant" re published 1998**
64 -"At issue here is a mark by means of which we can securely distinguish
65 -AND
66 -, each of which is in itself infallible." (137-138)
67 -
68 -
69 -===Offence:===
70 -
71 -
72 -====Advocacy Text: The United States ought to guarantee the right to housing. I won't defend implementation. The framework questions whether or not the affirmative's rights based approach to housing passes the test of non-contradiction, which is prerequisite to policy action. ====
73 -
74 -=====KING:=====
75 -**"Housing as a Freedom Right" PETER KING Housing Studies, Vol. 18, No. 5, 661–672, September 2003 Centre for Comparative Housing Research, Department of Public Policy, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK DD**
76 - "This paper has suggested there is great merit in presenting housing as a
77 -AND
78 -you, which impedes upon your freedom to coerce in the first place.
79 -
80 -
81 -====This affirms:====
82 -
83 -
84 -====First, the right to housing is an intrinsic extension of our right to freedom. It serves as the bedrock that allows us to freely exercise all other rights. ====
85 -
86 -=====KING 2:=====
87 -**"Housing as a Freedom Right" PETER KING Housing Studies, Vol. 18, No. 5, 661–672, September 2003 Centre for Comparative Housing Research, Department of Public Policy, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK DD**
88 - "Freedom rights can be seen as negative rights, in that they prohibit
89 -AND
90 -, in that all rights must be situated." (665-666)
91 -
92 -
93 -====Second, the situated nature of existence requires we own property before we are able to freely will actions. The right to housing ensures that everyone can wills freely regardless of your starting point. ====
94 -
95 -=====KING 3:=====
96 -**"Housing as a Freedom Right" PETER KING Housing Studies, Vol. 18, No. 5, 661–672, September 2003 Centre for Comparative Housing Research, Department of Public Policy, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK DD**
97 -"Property rules determine where one has a right to be. They define rights
98 -AND
99 -order functions that lead to a full right to housing." (667)
100 -
101 -
102 -====Third, an absolutist account of property is coercive. It constrains the homeless from literally doing anything by using the logic of violating someone's property rights. ====
103 -
104 -=====KING 4:=====
105 -**"Housing as a Freedom Right" PETER KING Housing Studies, Vol. 18, No. 5, 661–672, September 2003 Centre for Comparative Housing Research, Department of Public Policy, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK DD**
106 - "Homelessness is defined by Waldron as the very condition where one is "
107 -AND
108 -unable to do anything without infringing the rights of others." (667)
109 -
110 -
111 -====Finally, rights based approaches are key. They reaffirm individual freedom and check power relations. Consequential considerations collapse to rights in order to preserve their overall utility. ====
112 -
113 -=====KING 5:=====
114 -**"Housing as a Freedom Right" PETER KING Housing Studies, Vol. 18, No. 5, 661–672, September 2003 Centre for Comparative Housing Research, Department of Public Policy, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK DD**
115 -"First, though, it is necessary to suggest briefly why rights-based
116 -AND
117 -the interests of others count as much as our own." (662)
118 -
119 -
120 -===Underview ===
121 -
122 -
123 -====The hegemonic capitalist relies on profits over the basic need for shelter – the right to housing solves ====
124 -
125 -=====Duhalde '13:=====
126 -Duhalde '13 (David, "Capitalism and Poverty: A Socialist Analysis," Democratic Socialists of America, Feb 2013, http://www.dsausa.org/capitalism_and_poverty, TW)
127 -A socialist analysis of homelessness illustrates how the workings of capitalism cause one major aspect
128 -AND
129 -of the superior housing stock in such countries as the Netherlands and Germany.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-03-10 23:24:29.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Varad Argawala
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Athens MP
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -30
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -5
Team
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Cy-Fair Welch Aff
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -MAR-APR Kant AC
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -TFA State
Caselist.CitesClass[37]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,141 +1,0 @@
1 -Subjects are always vulnerable towards the other, 2 warrants:
2 -
3 -Any judgement we take as agents is governed by a set of norms of understanding that are not our own.
4 -Butler 1:
5 -Butler '05 (Judith, American philosopher and gender theorist whose work has influenced political philosophy, ethics and the fields of feminist, queer and literary theory, "Giving An Account of Oneself," Fordham University Press, 2005, TW)
6 -"In all the talk
7 -AND
8 -the agency of its use."
9 -
10 -2. Our body is precarious towards the other before agency.
11 -Butler 2:
12 -
13 -Butler '05 (Judith, American philosopher and gender theorist whose work has influenced political philosophy, ethics and the fields of feminist, queer and literary theory, "Giving An Account of Oneself," Fordham University Press, 2005, TW)
14 -
15 -We can surely
16 -AND
17 -Notion of narrative accountability
18 -
19 -And, the subject does not have jurisdiction over its own opacity so it cannot ignore obligations from precariousness because they ground the subject in ways that cannot be repossessed in giving an account one's self.
20 -Butler 3:
21 -
22 -Giving an Account of Oneself. Judith Butler. Diacritics, Vol. 31, No. 4. (Winter, 2001), pp. 22-40. UH-DD
23 -"In recent years,
24 -AND
25 -important ethical bonds."
26 -
27 -Thus, the standard is rejecting norms that deny the precariousness of subjects.
28 -
29 -Independently prefer-
30 -
31 -Violence and difference is ontologically inevitable.
32 -
33 -Any moral theory because it requires one to distinguish between the ethical and anti-ethical. Discrimination becomes a condition for any decision, so justice is found in violence.
34 -
35 -HÄGGLUND 1:
36 -"THE NECESSITY OF DISCRIMINATION DISJOINING DERRIDA AND LEVINAS" MARTIN HÄGGLUND UH-DD
37 -"Derrida targets precisely
38 -AND
39 -perpetrating the better." (46-48)
40 -
41 -
42 -Encountering radical difference is to encounter the limits of acknowledgement itself. You can never know the radically different as they know themselves because your identity depends on the exclusion of theirs, yet nonetheless you need them to have any conception of yourself. Embracing radical difference requires we embrace precariousness in order to better understand the other.
43 -Butler 4:
44 -
45 -Giving an Account of Oneself. Judith Butler. Diacritics, Vol. 31, No. 4. (Winter, 2001), pp. 22-40. UH-DD
46 -
47 -Can a new
48 -AND
49 - partial opacity to themselves.
50 -
51 -
52 -Contention One – Homeless lives are rendered ungrievable
53 -
54 -A) Homeless deaths are routinized.
55 -
56 -Graham:
57 -Graham Jordan (covers Orange County government for the Register, Journalist ), “ Orange County homeless deaths hit all-time high”, The Orange County Resister, Feburary 3 2017, http://www.ocregister.com/articles/homeless-743047-county-people.html KA
58 -
59 -The deaths are so
60 -AND
61 -prevented with better resources.
62 -
63 -B) Those viewed as homeless are in an ethnic genocide to reduce the risk of contraction of ‘their filth.’
64 -Amster ‘3:
65 -Amster Randall (author, activist, and educator in areas including peace, ecology, homelessness, and anarchism. Program on Justice and Peace at Georgetown University), “Patterns of Exclusion: Sanitizing Space, Criminalizing Homelessness” Social Justice/ Global Options, 2003 KA
66 -
67 -In analyzing "new urban spaces,"
68 -AND
69 -editorial image of Tempe’s major downtown thoroughfare, Mill Avenue (February 12,2000)
70 -
71 -
72 -C) Structural barriers are to blame ~-~-- lack of adequate housing spills over into more infection and healthcare.
73 -
74 -Foucault ’01:
75 -Foucault ’01. Cedric Foucault, Didir Raoult, Phillippe Brouqi. “Infections in the Homeless.” Vol. 1 No. 2. The Lancet. September 2001. // MK
76 -
77 -Homeless people in
78 -AND
79 -neglected field of study.
80 -
81 -As a result, they are criminalized and socially excluded ~-~-- they’re stuck in a static identity based on sexual orientation squo insufficiency means try or die.
82 -
83 -Bagby ’14:
84 -BAGBY ’14. It’s time for Truvada — Atlanta HIV/AIDS activists in praise of PrEP Dyana Bagby June 5, 2014 11:38 pm http://thegavoice.com/time-truvada-atlanta-hivaids-activists-praise-prep/ MK
85 -
86 -In most states
87 -AND
88 -people living with HIV.
89 -
90 -D) The state of being rendered ungrievable is more than just being oppressed. Non-grievability separates death from having any impact on a social relationship, which reduces agency to something outside of precariousness. Grievability is necessary to apprehended the vulnerability in our ontology.
91 -
92 -Butler 6:
93 -“Frames of War” by Judith Butler 2009 UH-DD
94 -“Over and against
95 -AND
96 -
97 -exposed to non-life from the start.” 14-15
98 -
99 -
100 -
101 -Contention Two – the right to housing is key to solve
102 -
103 -In order to solve the exclusionary narrative constructed around homeless people we must recognize their right to exist – the right to housing is key
104 -
105 -Nunez ’04:
106 -Ralph Da Costa Nunez, Homes for the homeless, Inc. NY, “Book Reviews: Citizens Without Shelter: Homelessness, Democracy, and Political Exclusion by Leonard C. Feldman.” Ithaca NY Cornell University Press 2004 AL
107 -
108 -The author advances
109 -AND
110 -provides such an environment.
111 -
112 -
113 -Norms of non-grievability depend upon the reproduction of their usage through frames, such as the manipulation of the filthy homeless man. Our stance must impede upon the reproduction of this frame, which requires we recognize that ‘homeless’ from its norms of usage.
114 -
115 -Butler 7:
116 -“Frames of War” by Judith Butler 2009 UH-DD
117 -
118 -“The frame that
119 -AND
120 -of illegitimate authority?” 10-11
121 -
122 -
123 -Underview
124 -1. It cannot prescribe a motivational reason to follow their theory—especially to the oppressed and ungrievable—since the ideal has diverged from the descriptive conditions that motivate agents.
125 -
126 -MILLS:
127 -Charles W. Mills, “Ideal Theory” as Ideology, 2005
128 -(“Ideal Theory” as Ideology CHARLES W. MILLS 2004 UH-DD)
129 -
130 -“A first possible
131 -AND
132 -just completely implausible?”
133 -
134 -2. Abstracting away from the particularities of the body adopts the white man ethic. This is not an ad hominin—only privilege’s identities can exist without being burdened by the material particularities of their body.
135 -
136 -MILLS 2:
137 -(“Ideal Theory” as Ideology CHARLES W. MILLS 2004 UH-DD)
138 -
139 -“The crucial common
140 -AND
141 -may be misleading.” (175)
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-03-14 19:48:09.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Arun Sharma, Robey Holland, Emily Jackson
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Klein Oak AG
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -31
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Doubles
Team
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Cy-Fair Welch Aff
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -MAR-APR Butler AC
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -TFA State
Caselist.CitesClass[38]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,118 +1,0 @@
1 -To give a full account of my agency is impossible. My body has a history that I can't recollect, yet it still grounds who I am. Existence begins with bare vulnerability towards the Other.
2 -
3 -Butler 1:
4 -Giving an Account of Oneself. Judith Butler. Diacritics, Vol. 31, No. 4. (Winter, 2001), pp. 22-40. UH DD
5 -There are, then, several ways in which the account I may give of
6 -AND
7 -disposition in the place of a full and satisfying notion of narrative accountability?
8 -
9 -
10 -The precarious exposure of the pre-subject to the other begins with language. After being enculturated into a linguistic scheme, we develop an interpretation of meaning and become aware of our existence in our body. A body without an agent experiences the world but isn't aware of the meaning of the experience. Once inscribed in language, experiencing the spectacle of a body without an agent becomes impossible.
11 -
12 -Butler 2:
13 -"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD
14 -"Language sustains the body not by bringing it into being or feeding it in
15 -AND
16 -accordingly, outside of it, in abjection." (Pg. 5)
17 -
18 -
19 -Consistency with the precariousness of linguistic ontology is categorically binding. The subject doesn't have jurisdiction over its own opacity so it can't ignore obligations that stem from linguistic precariousness since they ground the subject in ways that can't be repossessed in giving an account of one's self.
20 -
21 -Butler 3:
22 -Giving an Account of Oneself. Judith Butler. Diacritics, Vol. 31, No. 4. (Winter, 2001), pp. 22-40.
23 -"In recent years, the critique of poststructuralism, itself loquacious, has held
24 -AND
25 -
26 -Thus, the standard is consistency with linguistic ontology. Independently prefer:
27 -
28 -
29 -First, we aren't fully autonomous subjects. Our ends are always mediated by a linguistic scheme that isn't fully our own.
30 -
31 -Butler 4:
32 -Giving an Account of Oneself. Judith Butler. Diacritics, Vol. 31, No. 4. (Winter, 2001), pp. 22-40.
33 -In all the talk about the social construction of the subject, we have perhaps
34 -AND
35 -I am both subjected to that norm and the agency of its use."
36 -
37 -
38 -Second, the framework would justify a fluid conception of agency since language is inherently a social practice that changes over time.
39 -
40 -
41 -Multiple Implications:
42 -
43 -A. Analytic
44 -B. Analytic
45 -C. Analytic
46 -D. Analytic
47 -F. Analytic
48 -
49 -
50 -Offense
51 -I defend the res as a gen principle- my offense justifies that any restriction is bad, of which restrictions on constitutionally protected speech are a subset of, meaning if my offense is true, the statement of the res as a general claim is also true.
52 -Now, affirm:
53 -
54 -
55 -First, through restrictions, censorship refuses to capture the events described in language. This linguistic violence attempts to erase a specific language, and in effect, erase the descriptions that follow the language. Not only does this miserably fail to erase the injurious speech, but the desire to manipulate language, to control the uncontrollable presence of its descriptions, propagates a quenching desire for statist censorship.
56 -
57 -Butler 5:
58 -BUTLER 4: "Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD
59 -"Morrison's analogy suggests that language lives or dies as a living thing might live
60 -AND
61 -in the process, which turns any net benefit restrictions could possibly have.
62 -
63 -
64 -Second, censorship is guaranteed failure. It prevents survival strategies and it requires using injurious speech in its own critique. This ensures recirculation.
65 -
66 -Butler 6:
67 -BUTLER 5: "Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD
68 -"Neither view can account for the restaging and resignifying of offensive utterance, deployments
69 -AND
70 -since it requires deploying the speech in its context. Appropriation is best.
71 -
72 -
73 -Third, censorship is an issue of interpretation. This ensures cooption.
74 -
75 -Butler 7:
76 -BUTLER 6: "Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD
77 -"Indeed, recent efforts to establish the incontrovertibly wounding power of certain words seem
78 -AND
79 -invoked and restaged at the moment of utterance." (Pg. 13)
80 -
81 -
82 -Fourth, injurious speech subjugates agents but paradoxically marks them as socially recognizable within language. This presents a site of linguistic reversibility. Since language is temporal, we can reverse the norms that make injurious speech possible.
83 -
84 -Butler 8:
85 -BUTLER 7: "Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD
86 -"One is not simply fixed by the name that one is called. In
87 -AND
88 -framework, affirming solves better for any net benefit a restriction could have.
89 -
90 -
91 -Fifth, injurious speech is conditioned by a specific history of social normalization. Strategies that account for the damage of the utterance in the moment can't solve for the violence that precedes and follows the moment.
92 -
93 -Butler 9
94 -BUTLER 8: "Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD
95 -As utterances, they work to the extent that they are given in the form
96 -AND
97 -it's impossible to censor language given its ontology, this means no offense.
98 -
99 -Analytic
100 -
101 -
102 -And, language construction doesn't correlation to physical injury, physical injury through speech can't precede or occur independent from accounting for linguistic injury. Policies that censor speech based on physical injury misdiagnose the problem.
103 -
104 -Butler 10
105 -BUTLER 9: "Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD
106 -"Linguistic survival" implies that a certain kind of surviving takes place in language
107 -AND
108 -physical and linguistic vulnerability is essential to the description of linguistic vulnerability itself.
109 -
110 -
111 -
112 -AND - Pragmatic calculations fail to give life meaning or presume an ontological establishment. The AFF is a pre-req to even understand consequence
113 -
114 -Butler '11:
115 -BUTLER 09 (Judith, PhD, Yale, Maxine Elliot Professor of Rhetoric and Comparative Literature, "Frames of War: When is Life Grievable?", Verso, 2009, pp. 180-1)
116 -"For the injunction to non-violence to make sense, it is first
117 -AND
118 -violence is derived from the apprehension of equality in the midst of precariousness.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-05-01 21:52:21.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Mark Gorthey
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Pembroke Pines Charter SS
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -32
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2
Team
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Cy-Fair Welch Aff
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -JAN-FEB Butler v1
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -TOC
Caselist.RoundClass[21]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -26,27
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-02-02 19:52:43.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Cathy Terrace
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Earl Warren NO
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -5
RoundReport
... ... @@ -1,2 +1,0 @@
1 -1AC - Radical Democracy AC
2 -1N - Afropessism K
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -University of Houston
Caselist.RoundClass[22]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -28
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-02-02 19:53:20.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Arun Sharma, Neel Yereni, Daniel Conrad
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Cedar Park MG
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Quarters
RoundReport
... ... @@ -1,2 +1,0 @@
1 -1AC - Radical Democracy
2 -1N - Nepantla K ROTB Term Papers PIC Agonism = Consequences Case Turns
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -University of Houston
Caselist.RoundClass[24]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -29
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-02-03 05:28:17.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -All
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -All
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -3
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Any
Caselist.RoundClass[25]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -30,31
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-02-03 23:55:42.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Jennifer Camacho
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Winston Churchill BY
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -1
RoundReport
... ... @@ -1,3 +1,0 @@
1 -1AC - Rule Util AC
2 -1N - Antiblackness K
3 -1AR - A2 Unflinching Paradigmatic Analysis SHORT
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Colleyville
Caselist.RoundClass[26]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -32
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-02-05 16:10:33.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Jane Boyd
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Westwood AD
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -4
RoundReport
... ... @@ -1,2 +1,0 @@
1 -1AC - Rule Util v2
2 -1N - Frat CP Endowments DA
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Colleyville
Caselist.RoundClass[27]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -33
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-02-05 16:33:30.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Preston Stolte
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Keller MH
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Doubles
RoundReport
... ... @@ -1,2 +1,0 @@
1 -1AC - Radical Racists AC
2 -1N - Kant NC
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Colleyville
Caselist.RoundClass[28]
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-03-10 13:46:48.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Derek Liles
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Greenhill BZ
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -1
RoundReport
... ... @@ -1,3 +1,0 @@
1 -1AC - Young v1
2 -1N - Positive Right T Warren K Inherency Indites Segregation DA Housing Traps DA Welfare Bad Solvency Indites
3 -1AR - A2 State Bad R2H = Negative Right
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -TFA State
Caselist.RoundClass[29]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -35
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-03-10 23:22:07.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Greg McGee
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Flower Mound KW
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -4
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -TFA State
Caselist.RoundClass[30]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -36
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-03-10 23:24:26.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Varad Argawala
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Athens MP
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -5
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -TFA State
Caselist.RoundClass[31]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -37
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-03-14 19:48:06.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Arun Sharma, Robey Holland, Emily Jackson
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Klein Oak AG
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Doubles
RoundReport
... ... @@ -1,3 +1,0 @@
1 -1AC - Butler
2 -1N - Deleuze
3 -1AR - Butler crushes Deleuze
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -TFA State
Caselist.RoundClass[32]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -38
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2017-05-01 21:52:18.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Mark Gorthey
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Pembroke Pines Charter SS
Round
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2
RoundReport
... ... @@ -1,4 +1,0 @@
1 -1AC - Butler v1
2 -1N - Truth Testing ROTB truth testing nc remove all constitutional prohibitions cp case turns and a agonistic politics K
3 -1AR - perms on CP and K no link args on K bindingness overview concede truth testing and analytics
4 -2N - truth testing NC and CP
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -TOC
Caselist.CitesClass[23]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,111 @@
1 +====First, our body is a condensed history of millions of years of mutations, and we continue to be vulnerable to the random laws of genetics. Random mutations create the inevitable conditions for evolution and explain the diversity of life. ====
2 +
3 +=====Haviland ~~1~~:=====
4 +Haviland, William A. Anthropology: The Human Challenge, 15th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2017. ~~Yuzu~~. UH-DD
5 +"At the level of an
6 +AND
7 +for some new adaptation." (Pg. 41)
8 +
9 +Implications:
10 +A) Analytic
11 +B) Analytic
12 +C) Analytic
13 +D) Analytic
14 +E) Analytic
15 +F) Analytic
16 +
17 +====The evolution of our brains created the conditions for cultural adaptation. No longer did we have to wait generations to prevail environmental pressures. Through culture, we could overcome challenges that were not possible from a purely biology standpoint. ====
18 +
19 +=====Haviland ~~2~~: =====
20 +Haviland, William A. Anthropology: The Human Challenge, 15th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2017. ~~Yuzu~~. UH-DD
21 +"In the quest for
22 +AND
23 +and cultural change." (Pg. 167-168)
24 +
25 +Implications:
26 +A. Analytic
27 +B. Analytic
28 +C. Analytic
29 +D. Analytic
30 +
31 +====And, if cultural conflict is inevitable, the goal of intercultural politics is not to eradicate conflict, but to channel conflict in ways productive to intercultural coexistence. This requires an agonistic commitment, which reframes the other as an advisory instead of an enemy. ====
32 +
33 +=====Mouffe ~~1~~:=====
34 +"On the Political" by Chantal Mouffe 2000 UH-DD
35 +"Once the theoretical terrain
36 +AND
37 +in an ongoing confrontation." (Pg. 101-102)
38 +
39 +====Thus, the standard is promoting agonistic democracy. To clarify, the standard is concerned with following the constitutive procedures of agonistic democracy, not ends. ====
40 +
41 +=====Mouffe ~~2~~:=====
42 +(Chantal Mouffe, Professor at the Department of Political Science of the Institute for Advanced Studies. June 2000. "The Democratic Paradox")
43 +"To avoid any confusion,
44 +AND
45 +for conflicting interpretations." (Pg. 120-121)
46 +
47 +===Contention One – ===
48 +
49 +====A – Analytic.====
50 +
51 +====B – Injurious speech subjugates agents but paradoxically marks them as socially recognizable within language. This presents a site of linguistic reversibility. Since language is temporal, we can reverse the norms that make injurious speech possible. ====
52 +
53 +=====BUTLER ~~1~~:=====
54 +"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD
55 +"One is not simply fixed by the name that one is called. In being called an injurious name, one is derogated and demeaned. But the name holds out another possibility as well: by being called a name~~d~~, one is also, paradoxically, given a certain possibility for social existence, initiated into a temporal life of language that exceeds the prior purposes that animate that call. Thus the injurious address may appear to fix or paralyze the one it hails, but it may also produce an unexpected and enabling response. If to be addressed is to be interpellated, then the offensive call runs the risk of inaugurating a subject in speech who comes to use language to counter the offensive call. When the address is injurious, it works its force upon the one it injures. What is this force, and how might we come to understand its faultlines?" (Pg. 2)
56 +
57 +Analytic
58 +
59 +===Contention Two – ===
60 +
61 +====A - Hate speech is different from hate crimes ====
62 +
63 +=====Kamier:=====
64 +Kaminer Wendy (author, lawyer, journalist at the Atlantic and civil libertarian) "Why We Need to Tolerate Hate" Nov. 28 2012, The Atlantic, http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/11/why-we-need-to-tolerate-hate/265654/ KA
65 +Decorate your house
66 +AND
67 +business of the state.
68 +
69 +====B - Agonism requires the diversity of beliefs to allow engagement.====
70 +
71 +=====Mouffe ~~3~~:=====
72 +(Chantal Mouffe, Professor at the Department of Political Science of the Institute for Advanced Studies. June 2000. "The Democratic Paradox")\
73 +I submit that this
74 +AND
75 +thinking is invaluable.
76 +
77 +===Contention Three – ===
78 +
79 +====Censorship allows our own logic to get co-opted crushing social movements.====
80 +
81 +=====Adler '96:=====
82 +(Adler, Amy. "Whats Left?: Hate Speech, Pornography, And The Problem For Artistic Expression." California Law Review, Vol. 84, No. 6. December 1996. Web. December 07, 2016. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3481093.)
83 +The failure of leftist
84 +AND
85 +left's very eyes.
86 +
87 +====Censorship is an issue of interpretation. This ensures cooption. ====
88 +
89 +=====BUTLER ~~2~~:=====
90 +"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD
91 +"Indeed, recent efforts
92 +AND
93 +the moment of utterance." (Pg. 13)
94 +
95 +====Censorship only reifies the reigning hegemonic ideology. ====
96 +
97 +=====Ward '90:=====
98 +Ward '90 (Dr. David V, ~~Phil Prof at Widener University,~~ "Library Trends," Philosophical Issues in Censorship and Intellectual Freedom, Vol 39, No 1 and 2, 1990, pg 86-87)
99 +
100 +Second, even if the opinion
101 +AND
102 +the expressions of others.
103 +
104 +===Underview===
105 +
106 +====Arguments about construction of certain identities can never turn the framework- that misses the goal of agonism. Identity politics homogenizes and turns their identity.====
107 +Mouffe 4 ~~Chantal Mouffe, Professor at the Department of Political Science of the Institute for Advanced Studies. June 2000. "The Democratic Paradox"~~
108 +
109 +A well-functioning democracy
110 +AND
111 +basis of civility.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-01-07 13:58:53.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Cathy Terrace
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Earl Warren NO
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +19
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +5
Team
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Cy-Fair Welch Aff
Title
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +JAN-FEB Radical Democracy AC
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +University of Houston
Caselist.CitesClass[24]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,7 @@
1 +Anti-blackness is not an ontological antagonism~-~--conflict is inevitable in politics, but does not have to be demarcated around whiteness and blackness.
2 +
3 +Peter Hudson 13, Political Studies Department, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg , South Africa, has been on the editorial board of the Africa Perspective: The South African Journal of Sociology and Theoria: A Journal of Political and Social Theory and Transformation, and is a member of the Johannesburg Workshop in Theory and Criticism, The state and the colonial unconscious, Social Dynamics: A journal of African studies, 2013
4 +
5 +Thus the self-same/other
6 +AND
7 +based on a determinate identity.
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-01-07 13:58:53.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Cathy Terrace
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Earl Warren NO
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +19
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +5
Team
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Cy-Fair Welch Aff
Title
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2 A2 Blackness is Ontological
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +University of Houston
Caselist.CitesClass[25]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,108 @@
1 +First, our body is a condensed history of millions of years of mutations, and we continue to be vulnerable to the random laws of genetics. Random mutations create the inevitable conditions for evolution and explain the diversity of life.
2 +Haviland ~1~:
3 +
4 +Haviland, William A. Anthropology: The Human Challenge, 15th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2017. ~Yuzu~. UH-DD
5 +"At the level of an
6 +AND
7 +for some new adaptation." (Pg. 41)
8 +
9 +Implications:
10 +A) Analytic
11 +B) Analytic
12 +C) Analytic
13 +D) Analytic
14 +E) Analytic
15 +F) Analytic
16 +
17 +The evolution of our brains created the conditions for cultural adaptation. No longer did we have to wait generations to prevail environmental pressures. Through culture, we could overcome challenges that were not possible from a purely biology standpoint.
18 +Haviland ~2~:
19 +
20 +Haviland, William A. Anthropology: The Human Challenge, 15th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2017. ~Yuzu~. UH-DD
21 +"In the quest for
22 +AND
23 +and cultural change." (Pg. 167-168)
24 +
25 +Implications:
26 +A. Analytic
27 +B. Analytic
28 +C. Analytic
29 +D. Analytic
30 +
31 +And, if cultural conflict is inevitable, the goal of intercultural politics is not to eradicate conflict, but to channel conflict in ways productive to intercultural coexistence. This requires an agonistic commitment, which reframes the other as an advisory instead of an enemy.
32 +Mouffe ~1~:
33 +
34 +"On the Political" by Chantal Mouffe 2000 UH-DD
35 +"Once the theoretical terrain
36 +AND
37 +in an ongoing confrontation." (Pg. 101-102)
38 +
39 +Thus, the standard is promoting agonistic democracy. To clarify, the standard is concerned with following the constitutive procedures of agonistic democracy, not ends.
40 +Mouffe ~2~:
41 +
42 +(Chantal Mouffe, Professor at the Department of Political Science of the Institute for Advanced Studies. June 2000. "The Democratic Paradox")
43 +"To avoid any confusion,
44 +AND
45 +for conflicting interpretations." (Pg. 120-121)
46 +
47 +Contention One –
48 +
49 +A – Analytic.
50 +B – Injurious speech subjugates agents but paradoxically marks them as socially recognizable within language. This presents a site of linguistic reversibility. Since language is temporal, we can reverse the norms that make injurious speech possible.
51 +BUTLER ~1~:
52 +
53 +"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD
54 +"One is not simply =
55 +AND
56 +understand its faultlines?" (Pg. 2)
57 +
58 +Analytic
59 +
60 +Contention Two –
61 +
62 +Agonism requires the diversity of beliefs to allow engagement.
63 +Mouffe ~3~:
64 +
65 +(Chantal Mouffe, Professor at the Department of Political Science of the Institute for Advanced Studies. June 2000. "The Democratic Paradox")\
66 +I submit that this
67 +AND
68 +thinking is invaluable.
69 +
70 +Contention Three –
71 +
72 +Censorship only reifies the reigning hegemonic ideology.
73 +Ward '90:
74 +
75 +Ward '90 (Dr. David V, ~Phil Prof at Widener University,~ "Library Trends," Philosophical Issues in Censorship and Intellectual Freedom, Vol 39, No 1 and 2, 1990, pg 86-87)
76 +
77 +Second, even if the opinion
78 +AND
79 +the expressions of others.
80 +
81 +Censorship is an issue of interpretation. This ensures cooption.
82 +BUTLER ~2~:
83 +
84 +"Excitable Speech: A Politics of Performativity" by Judith Butler 1997 UH-DD
85 +"Indeed, recent efforts
86 +AND
87 +the moment of utterance." (Pg. 13)
88 +
89 +
90 +Underview
91 +
92 +The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best meets their burden under a truth testing paradigm. Analytic
93 +Prefer:
94 +
95 +Standards of goodness for any activity, like debate, inevitably collapse to the intrinsic form. The ends of debate are inseparable from the rules that govern it. This alone explains the possibility of binding standards.
96 +BOYLE and LAVIN:
97 +Boyle, Matthew and Douglas Lavin. 2010. Goodness and desire. In Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good, ed. Sergio Tenenbaum. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 32-33. DD
98 +"A certain standard of goodness for a thing follows inevitably from its belonging to
99 +AND
100 +an arbitrary claim, but a premise up for debate under truth testing.
101 +
102 +Outweighs:
103 +A. Analytic
104 +B. Analytic
105 +C. Analytic
106 +D. Analytic
107 +
108 +Analytic
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-01-08 16:04:10.154
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Arun Sharma, Neel Yereni, Daniel Conrad
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Cedar Park MG
ParentRound
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +20
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Quarters
Team
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Cy-Fair Welch Aff
Title
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +JAN-FEB Radical Democracy AC v2
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +University of Houston
Caselist.RoundClass[19]
Cites
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +23,24
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-01-07 13:58:46.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Cathy Terrace
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Earl Warren NO
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +5
RoundReport
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,2 @@
1 +1AC - Radical Democracy AC
2 +1N - Afropessism K
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +University of Houston
Caselist.RoundClass[20]
EntryDate
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2017-01-08 16:04:07.0
Judge
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Arun Sharma, Neel Yereni, Daniel Conrad
Opponent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Cedar Park MG
Round
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Quarters
RoundReport
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,2 @@
1 +1AC - Radical Democracy
2 +1N - Nepantla K ROTB Term Papers PIC Agonism = Consequences Case Turns
Tournament
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +University of Houston

Schools

Aberdeen Central (SD)
Acton-Boxborough (MA)
Albany (CA)
Albuquerque Academy (NM)
Alief Taylor (TX)
American Heritage Boca Delray (FL)
American Heritage Plantation (FL)
Anderson (TX)
Annie Wright (WA)
Apple Valley (MN)
Appleton East (WI)
Arbor View (NV)
Arcadia (CA)
Archbishop Mitty (CA)
Ardrey Kell (NC)
Ashland (OR)
Athens (TX)
Bainbridge (WA)
Bakersfield (CA)
Barbers Hill (TX)
Barrington (IL)
BASIS Mesa (AZ)
BASIS Scottsdale (AZ)
BASIS Silicon (CA)
Beckman (CA)
Bellarmine (CA)
Benjamin Franklin (LA)
Benjamin N Cardozo (NY)
Bentonville (AR)
Bergen County (NJ)
Bettendorf (IA)
Bingham (UT)
Blue Valley Southwest (KS)
Brentwood (CA)
Brentwood Middle (CA)
Bridgewater-Raritan (NJ)
Bronx Science (NY)
Brophy College Prep (AZ)
Brown (KY)
Byram Hills (NY)
Byron Nelson (TX)
Cabot (AR)
Calhoun Homeschool (TX)
Cambridge Rindge (MA)
Canyon Crest (CA)
Canyon Springs (NV)
Cape Fear Academy (NC)
Carmel Valley Independent (CA)
Carpe Diem (NJ)
Cedar Park (TX)
Cedar Ridge (TX)
Centennial (ID)
Centennial (TX)
Center For Talented Youth (MD)
Cerritos (CA)
Chaminade (CA)
Chandler (AZ)
Chandler Prep (AZ)
Chaparral (AZ)
Charles E Smith (MD)
Cherokee (OK)
Christ Episcopal (LA)
Christopher Columbus (FL)
Cinco Ranch (TX)
Citrus Valley (CA)
Claremont (CA)
Clark (NV)
Clark (TX)
Clear Brook (TX)
Clements (TX)
Clovis North (CA)
College Prep (CA)
Collegiate (NY)
Colleyville Heritage (TX)
Concord Carlisle (MA)
Concordia Lutheran (TX)
Connally (TX)
Coral Glades (FL)
Coral Science (NV)
Coral Springs (FL)
Coppell (TX)
Copper Hills (UT)
Corona Del Sol (AZ)
Crandall (TX)
Crossroads (CA)
Cupertino (CA)
Cy-Fair (TX)
Cypress Bay (FL)
Cypress Falls (TX)
Cypress Lakes (TX)
Cypress Ridge (TX)
Cypress Springs (TX)
Cypress Woods (TX)
Dallastown (PA)
Davis (CA)
Delbarton (NJ)
Derby (KS)
Des Moines Roosevelt (IA)
Desert Vista (AZ)
Diamond Bar (CA)
Dobson (AZ)
Dougherty Valley (CA)
Dowling Catholic (IA)
Dripping Springs (TX)
Dulles (TX)
duPont Manual (KY)
Dwyer (FL)
Eagle (ID)
Eastside Catholic (WA)
Edgemont (NY)
Edina (MN)
Edmond North (OK)
Edmond Santa Fe (OK)
El Cerrito (CA)
Elkins (TX)
Enloe (NC)
Episcopal (TX)
Evanston (IL)
Evergreen Valley (CA)
Ferris (TX)
Flintridge Sacred Heart (CA)
Flower Mound (TX)
Fordham Prep (NY)
Fort Lauderdale (FL)
Fort Walton Beach (FL)
Freehold Township (NJ)
Fremont (NE)
Frontier (MO)
Gabrielino (CA)
Garland (TX)
George Ranch (TX)
Georgetown Day (DC)
Gig Harbor (WA)
Gilmour (OH)
Glenbrook South (IL)
Gonzaga Prep (WA)
Grand Junction (CO)
Grapevine (TX)
Green Valley (NV)
Greenhill (TX)
Guyer (TX)
Hamilton (AZ)
Hamilton (MT)
Harker (CA)
Harmony (TX)
Harrison (NY)
Harvard Westlake (CA)
Hawken (OH)
Head Royce (CA)
Hebron (TX)
Heights (MD)
Hendrick Hudson (NY)
Henry Grady (GA)
Highland (UT)
Highland (ID)
Hockaday (TX)
Holy Cross (LA)
Homewood Flossmoor (IL)
Hopkins (MN)
Houston Homeschool (TX)
Hunter College (NY)
Hutchinson (KS)
Immaculate Heart (CA)
Independent (All)
Interlake (WA)
Isidore Newman (LA)
Jack C Hays (TX)
James Bowie (TX)
Jefferson City (MO)
Jersey Village (TX)
John Marshall (CA)
Juan Diego (UT)
Jupiter (FL)
Kapaun Mount Carmel (KS)
Kamiak (WA)
Katy Taylor (TX)
Keller (TX)
Kempner (TX)
Kent Denver (CO)
King (FL)
Kingwood (TX)
Kinkaid (TX)
Klein (TX)
Klein Oak (TX)
Kudos College (CA)
La Canada (CA)
La Costa Canyon (CA)
La Jolla (CA)
La Reina (CA)
Lafayette (MO)
Lake Highland (FL)
Lake Travis (TX)
Lakeville North (MN)
Lakeville South (MN)
Lamar (TX)
LAMP (AL)
Law Magnet (TX)
Langham Creek (TX)
Lansing (KS)
LaSalle College (PA)
Lawrence Free State (KS)
Layton (UT)
Leland (CA)
Leucadia Independent (CA)
Lexington (MA)
Liberty Christian (TX)
Lincoln (OR)
Lincoln (NE)
Lincoln East (NE)
Lindale (TX)
Livingston (NJ)
Logan (UT)
Lone Peak (UT)
Los Altos (CA)
Los Osos (CA)
Lovejoy (TX)
Loyola (CA)
Loyola Blakefield (MA)
Lynbrook (CA)
Maeser Prep (UT)
Mannford (OK)
Marcus (TX)
Marlborough (CA)
McClintock (AZ)
McDowell (PA)
McNeil (TX)
Meadows (NV)
Memorial (TX)
Millard North (NE)
Millard South (NE)
Millard West (NE)
Millburn (NJ)
Milpitas (CA)
Miramonte (CA)
Mission San Jose (CA)
Monsignor Kelly (TX)
Monta Vista (CA)
Montclair Kimberley (NJ)
Montgomery (TX)
Monticello (NY)
Montville Township (NJ)
Morris Hills (NJ)
Mountain Brook (AL)
Mountain Pointe (AZ)
Mountain View (CA)
Mountain View (AZ)
Murphy Middle (TX)
NCSSM (NC)
New Orleans Jesuit (LA)
New Trier (IL)
Newark Science (NJ)
Newburgh Free Academy (NY)
Newport (WA)
North Allegheny (PA)
North Crowley (TX)
North Hollywood (CA)
Northland Christian (TX)
Northwood (CA)
Notre Dame (CA)
Nueva (CA)
Oak Hall (FL)
Oakwood (CA)
Okoboji (IA)
Oxbridge (FL)
Oxford (CA)
Pacific Ridge (CA)
Palm Beach Gardens (FL)
Palo Alto Independent (CA)
Palos Verdes Peninsula (CA)
Park Crossing (AL)
Peak to Peak (CO)
Pembroke Pines (FL)
Pennsbury (PA)
Phillips Academy Andover (MA)
Phoenix Country Day (AZ)
Pine Crest (FL)
Pingry (NJ)
Pittsburgh Central Catholic (PA)
Plano East (TX)
Polytechnic (CA)
Presentation (CA)
Princeton (NJ)
Prosper (TX)
Quarry Lane (CA)
Raisbeck-Aviation (WA)
Rancho Bernardo (CA)
Randolph (NJ)
Reagan (TX)
Richardson (TX)
Ridge (NJ)
Ridge Point (TX)
Riverside (SC)
Robert Vela (TX)
Rosemount (MN)
Roseville (MN)
Round Rock (TX)
Rowland Hall (UT)
Royse City (TX)
Ruston (LA)
Sacred Heart (MA)
Sacred Heart (MS)
Sage Hill (CA)
Sage Ridge (NV)
Salado (TX)
Salpointe Catholic (AZ)
Sammamish (WA)
San Dieguito (CA)
San Marino (CA)
SandHoke (NC)
Santa Monica (CA)
Sarasota (FL)
Saratoga (CA)
Scarsdale (NY)
Servite (CA)
Seven Lakes (TX)
Shawnee Mission East (KS)
Shawnee Mission Northwest (KS)
Shawnee Mission South (KS)
Shawnee Mission West (KS)
Sky View (UT)
Skyline (UT)
Smithson Valley (TX)
Southlake Carroll (TX)
Sprague (OR)
St Agnes (TX)
St Andrews (MS)
St Francis (CA)
St James (AL)
St Johns (TX)
St Louis Park (MN)
St Margarets (CA)
St Marys Hall (TX)
St Thomas (MN)
St Thomas (TX)
Stephen F Austin (TX)
Stoneman Douglas (FL)
Stony Point (TX)
Strake Jesuit (TX)
Stratford (TX)
Stratford Independent (CA)
Stuyvesant (NY)
Success Academy (NY)
Sunnyslope (AZ)
Sunset (OR)
Syosset (NY)
Tahoma (WA)
Talley (AZ)
Texas Academy of Math and Science (TX)
Thomas Jefferson (VA)
Thompkins (TX)
Timber Creek (FL)
Timothy Christian (NJ)
Tom C Clark (TX)
Tompkins (TX)
Torrey Pines (CA)
Travis (TX)
Trinity (KY)
Trinity Prep (FL)
Trinity Valley (TX)
Truman (PA)
Turlock (CA)
Union (OK)
Unionville (PA)
University High (CA)
University School (OH)
University (FL)
Upper Arlington (OH)
Upper Dublin (PA)
Valley (IA)
Valor Christian (CO)
Vashon (WA)
Ventura (CA)
Veritas Prep (AZ)
Vestavia Hills (AL)
Vincentian (PA)
Walla Walla (WA)
Walt Whitman (MD)
Warren (TX)
Wenatchee (WA)
West (UT)
West Ranch (CA)
Westford (MA)
Westlake (TX)
Westview (OR)
Westwood (TX)
Whitefish Bay (WI)
Whitney (CA)
Wilson (DC)
Winston Churchill (TX)
Winter Springs (FL)
Woodlands (TX)
Woodlands College Park (TX)
Wren (SC)
Yucca Valley (CA)