| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,15 @@ |
|
1 |
+Beginning discussion with identity is essentialist – even if they acknowledge identity’s fluidity, identity as a starting point lapses into essentialism. They also over-determine autonomy which ignores group conditions that aren’t predicated upon individualism. MOWBRAY 10 |
|
2 |
+PhD, Senior Lecturer at Sydney University and Co-Director, Sydney Centre for International Law (Jacqueline, “Autonomy, Identity and Self-knowledge: A New ‘Solution’ to the Liberal-Communitarian ‘Problem’?” January 2014 Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14/02) |
|
3 |
+The problem of... the group itself |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+Tying pedagogy to our identities reinforces discursive militarism. Jay and Graff 95 |
|
6 |
+Professor in the department of English at University of Wisconsin ** professor of English and Education at University of Illinois at Chicago (Gregory and Gerald, “Critique of Critical Pedagogy” Higher Education Under Fire, p. 207-9) |
|
7 |
+The premise that... may change us |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+Using the ballot as a referendum on identity cedes agency to the sovereign, which recreates the violence against social movements that they kritik. CAMPBELL 98 |
|
10 |
+Professor of International Politics at the University of Newcastle (David, “Performing Politics and the Limits of Language” 1998) |
|
11 |
+Those who argue... the first place |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+Reject their focus of identity in place of analytical categories – identity-based politics forego the possibility for institutional change. HANCOCK 13 |
|
14 |
+Associate Professor of Political Science and Gender Studies at USC Ange-Marie, “Solidarity Politics for Millennials: A Guide to Ending the Oppression Olympics (The Politics of Intersectionality),” Palgrave MacMillan, December 5, 2013, http://sites.oxy.edu/ron/csp19/2010/BTOO20Chapter201.PDF, Accessed 7/22/15 |
|
15 |
+Analyzing American Politics... and its goals |