Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[3]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[3]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[3]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-11-04 20:56:30.815
	1	+2016-11-04 20:56:30.0

Caselist.CitesClass[3]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,13 @@
	1	+A. Interpretation: the affirmative may not defend a prohibition on uranium mining.
	2	+
	3	+A. Interpretation: the affirmative should defend the desirability of topical action. To clarify, the aff must defend that countries prohibit the production of nuclear power via a postfiat policy.
	4	+
	5	+A. Interpretation: the affirmative may not defend nuclear phase-out.
	6	+
	7	+A. Interpretation: In order to be topical on the 2016 September-October NDCA Lincoln-Douglas topic, affirmative debaters may not specify a single country or group of countries that ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power; rather, they must defend the resolution as a general principle.
	8	+
	9	+A. Interpretation: On the September-October 2016 LD resolution, affirmative debaters must only defend a prohibition on the production of energy produced by an atomic reaction capable of producing an alternative source of electrical power.
	10	+
	11	+A. Interpretation: During the November-December 2016 LD topic, affirmative debaters may only defend that the United States Federal Government eliminate qualified immunity.
	12	+
	13	+A. Interpretation: In order to be topical on the 2016 September-October NDCA Lincoln-Douglas topic, affirmative debaters may not specify a subset of police officers that ought to limit qualified immunity.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-11-04 20:56:32.252

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Any

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+You

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Quads

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Collegiate Moon Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Potential T Interps

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Any