Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[0]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[0]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,9 +1,0 @@
1		-A. Interpretation: the affirmative may not defend a prohibition on uranium mining.
2		-
3		-A. Interpretation: the affirmative should defend the desirability of topical action. To clarify, the aff must defend that countries prohibit the production of nuclear power via a postfiat policy.
4		-
5		-A. Interpretation: the affirmative may not defend nuclear phase-out.
6		-
7		-A. Interpretation: In order to be topical on the 2016 September-October NDCA Lincoln-Douglas topic, affirmative debaters may not specify a single country or group of countries that ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power; rather, they must defend the resolution as a general principle.
8		-
9		-A. Interpretation: On the September-October 2016 LD resolution, affirmative debaters must only defend a prohibition on the production of energy produced by an atomic reaction capable of producing an alternative source of electrical power.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-09-15 14:34:21.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Any

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-You

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-0

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Quads

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Collegiate Moon Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Potential T Interps

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Any