| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,55 @@ |
|
1 |
+The border is a zone of difference which makes possible violence in the borderland. Rigid distinctions between epistemological systems of thinking cannot account for hybridity. Embracing the borderland resist colonialism within epistemology itself. |
|
2 |
+KYNČLOVÁ 1 : |
|
3 |
+Tereza Jiroutová Kynčlová, « Elastic, Yet Unyielding: The U.S.-Mexico Border and Anzaldúa’s Oppositional Rearticulations of the Frontier », European journal of American studies Online, Vol 9, No 3 | 2014, document 3, Online since 23 December 2014, connection on 17 August 2016. URL : http://ejas.revues.org/10384 ; DOI : 10.4000/ Special Issue: Transnational Approaches to North American Regionalism UH-DD |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+“The border functions |
|
6 |
+AND |
|
7 |
+civil war within representation” (xiv).” (2) |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+Our approach is not purely grounded in the theoretical. The epistemology of binaries creates categories of normality within both sides of the dualism. This subjugates the lived experiences of those who can’t fit neither side of the border. |
|
10 |
+KYNČLOVÁ 2 : |
|
11 |
+Tereza Jiroutová Kynčlová, « Elastic, Yet Unyielding: The U.S.-Mexico Border and Anzaldúa’s Oppositional Rearticulations of the Frontier », European journal of American studies Online, Vol 9, No 3 | 2014, document 3, Online since 23 December 2014, connection on 17 August 2016. URL : http://ejas.revues.org/10384 ; DOI : 10.4000/ Special Issue: Transnational Approaches to North American Regionalism UH-DD |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+“The physical presence of |
|
14 |
+AND |
|
15 |
+methodology of Borderlands/La Frontera.” (3-4) |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+The United States is founded on rugged individualism made possible by the colonial gaze of manifest destiny. This sets up the stage for borders and inevitable violence towards those in the borderland. |
|
18 |
+KYNČLOVÁ 3 : |
|
19 |
+Tereza Jiroutová Kynčlová, « Elastic, Yet Unyielding: The U.S.-Mexico Border and Anzaldúa’s Oppositional Rearticulations of the Frontier », European journal of American studies Online, Vol 9, No 3 | 2014, document 3, Online since 23 December 2014, connection on 17 August 2016. URL : http://ejas.revues.org/10384 ; DOI : 10.4000/ Special Issue: Transnational Approaches to North American Regionalism UH-DD |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+“On the metaphorical level, |
|
22 |
+AND |
|
23 |
+in my presence (156).” (7) � |
|
24 |
+ |
|
25 |
+The affirmative’s focus on social norms in the construction of identity is a counterproductive starting point. We relate meaning to our experiences from social norms but these are simply deterritorialized views of the world that do not allow us to see beyond the border. We must embrace new meaning beyond the border of what is socially institutionalized. |
|
26 |
+KYNČLOVÁ 4 : |
|
27 |
+Tereza Jiroutová Kynčlová, « Elastic, Yet Unyielding: The U.S.-Mexico Border and Anzaldúa’s Oppositional Rearticulations of the Frontier », European journal of American studies Online, Vol 9, No 3 | 2014, document 3, Online since 23 December 2014, connection on 17 August 2016. URL : http://ejas.revues.org/10384 ; DOI : 10.4000/ Special Issue: Transnational Approaches to North American Regionalism UH-DD |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+“Further, Slotkin’s theoretical |
|
30 |
+AND |
|
31 |
+and struggle for recognition.” (2) |
|
32 |
+ |
|
33 |
+Prohibition reinscribes domination |
|
34 |
+Ball n.d: |
|
35 |
+Ball n.d (Anna, University of Manchester, “Writing in the Margins: Exploring the Borderlands in the Work of Janet Frame and Jane Champion,” Borders and Boundaries, Esharp Issue 5, n.d. http://www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_41163_en.pdf, TW) |
|
36 |
+ |
|
37 |
+How might the border, |
|
38 |
+AND |
|
39 |
+defended, fought over. (2002, p.198) |
|
40 |
+ |
|
41 |
+The alternative is to embrace NEPANTLA as a starting point for an epistemology that recognizes the exclusion of the borderland through dualisms. This creates the possibility of bridging the object-subject duality that keeps the mestiza a prisoner by recuperating the possibility of a space in between that allows us to theorize about new forms of becoming and productive epistemologies. |
|
42 |
+Zaccaria: |
|
43 |
+PAOLA ZACCARIA Living in El Lugar of Transformations, Translating Vision into Writing UH-DD |
|
44 |
+ |
|
45 |
+“In my opinion all |
|
46 |
+AND |
|
47 |
+multicultural/mestizo/nepantla translationscapes.” (186-191) |
|
48 |
+ |
|
49 |
+The role of the ballot is to adopt Nepantla pedagogy. Outweighs their role of the ballot – their unquestionable starting point of needing to construct debate through a singular axis rein trenches borders and epistemological colonialism in education. |
|
50 |
+Abraham: |
|
51 |
+Abraham, S. (2014). A Nepantla pedagogy: Comparing Anzaldúa’s and Bakhtin’s Ideas for pedagogical and social change. Critical Education, 5(5). University of Georgia UH-DD |
|
52 |
+ |
|
53 |
+“Nepantla is the site of |
|
54 |
+AND |
|
55 |
+school pedagogies and frame our educational research (Gonzalez-Lopez, 2006; Keating, 2006). |