Changes for page Christopher Columbus Navarrete Aff
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 4 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[9]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,121 @@ 1 +Ethics is divided between ideal and non-ideal theory. Ideal theory ask what justice demands in a perfect world while non-ideal theory ask what justice demands in a world that is already unjust. 2 + 3 +Prefer non-ideal theory as a meta-ethical starting point: 4 + 5 +Social Ontology: Ideal theory fails to recognize that agency is political – focusing on a pre-given subject ignores our constitutive social relations. An ontology that recognizes differentiation in subjectivity is key. 6 +BUTLER: 7 +(Judith Butler. 1992. “Continent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of “Postmodernism” Feminists Theorize the Political) 8 +“In a sense, the subject is 9 +AND 10 +prior to politics itself.” 11 + 12 +2. Motivation: Ideal theory can’t guide action since its starting point has diverged from the descriptive model of the real world. Non-ideal theory is key for ethical motivation. 13 +MILLS: 14 +Charles W. Mills, “Ideal Theory” as Ideology, 2005 15 +(“Ideal Theory” as Ideology CHARLES W. MILLS 2004 UH-DD, http://www.douglasficek.com/teaching/phi-102/mills.pdf) 16 + 17 +“A first possible argument 18 +AND 19 + just completely implausible?” 20 + 21 +3. Descriptive Ideality: ideal theory ignores social realities, which in turn contradicts ideals. Normative ideals aren’t created separately from the social norms that govern us since those influence what we can count as an ideal in the first place. 22 +MILLS 2: 23 +(“Ideal Theory” as Ideology CHARLES W. MILLS 2004 UH-DD, http://www.douglasficek.com/teaching/phi-102/mills.pdf) 24 + 25 +“I suggest that this spontaneous reaction, far from 26 +AND 27 +will never be achieved.” (170) 28 + 29 +4. Standpoint Epistemology: Ideal theory strips away questions of particularities and isolates a universal feature of agents. This normalizes a single experience and epistemically skews ethical theorizing. 30 +MILLS 3: 31 +(“Ideal Theory” as Ideology CHARLES W. MILLS 2004 UH-DD, http://www.douglasficek.com/teaching/phi-102/mills.pdf) 32 + 33 +“The crucial common claim 34 +AND 35 +arrived at may be misleading.” (175) 36 + 37 +Next, prefer liberation theology as a method for overcoming non-ideal structures of inequality: 38 + 39 +Value Inversion: The death of Christ represents a paradox in Christianity where POWER is weakness BORN again through death. Liberation theology inverses the value of power itself in recognition of the cross. 40 +CONE: 41 +James Cone highly influential black theologian known for his work on black liberation theology. The Cross and The Lynching Tree. Orbis Books. 2011. 42 +“The paradox of a 43 +AND 44 +white power—with powerless love, snatching victory out of defeat.” 45 + 46 +And, since our agency isn’t independent and constantly vulnerable towards the other our subjectivity is in a constant state of apophatic negativity. Inverting supremacy through liberation theology is the only way to account for apophatism. 47 +DANIELS: 48 +Brady, Daniels. A Poststructuralist Liberation Theology? Queer Theory and Apophaticism. Union Seminary Quarterly Review. Volume 64: 2 and 3. http://usqr.utsnyc.edu/article/a-poststructuralist-liberation-theology-queer-theory-apophaticism/ 49 + 50 +“Part 3: A Potential Point of Convergence 51 +AND 52 +be more fully realized.” 53 + 54 +2. Final Critique: Only transcendence in the cross provides the final critique to supremacy by inverting our epistemological understandings of power and designating intrinsic worth towards the oppressed. Sustaining current epistemologies dooms liberation in the long term. 55 +GORMAN: 56 +Michael J the Raymond E. Brown Professor of Biblical Studies and Theology at St. Mary's Seminary and University in Baltimore, Maryland, USA, where he has taught since 1991 . Cruciformity: Paul's Narrative Spirituality of the Cross. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans Pub., 2001. Print 57 + 58 +“All other claims to or 59 +AND 60 +cross and in communities shaped by it.” 61 + 62 +3. Pessimism/Optimism Paradox: Pessimism creates a lack of motivation since it engrains the idea that nothing can ever get better because oppression is intrinsic to the very structure of recognition. Optimism fails since it ignores how pervasive oppression is to our structure. Only liberation theology allows us to both say we don’t fit into the world and yet not fall into mere skepticism. 63 +CHESTERSON: 64 +Gilbert K Chesterton. Orthodoxy. 1908. http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/130/pg130.html 65 + 66 +But the important matter was this 67 +AND 68 +and why I could feel homesick at home. 69 + 70 +4. Soul Murder: Social death provides an ontological understanding over how others perceive the subject, but it can’t account for Soul Murder. This refers to the subject psychologically internalizing a fractured conception of the self due to their experience of gratuitous oppression. 71 +MASON: 72 +John Edwin Mason PhD from Yale. Current Prof at UAV. teaches African history and the history of photography. He has written extensively on early nineteenth-century South Africa history, especially the history of slavery, South African popular culture, especially the Cape Town New Year's Carnival and jazz. Social death and Resurrection: Slavery and Emancipation in South Africa. University of Virginia Press. 2003. ISBN 0-8139-2178-3 73 + 74 +“Patterson acknowledges that 75 +AND 76 +of soul murder and social death.” 77 + 78 +And, liberation theology provides the oppressed with meaning beyond unexplainable violence. A mere hope to continue surviving in this messed up world doesn’t provide the conceptual motivation for anything to ever change as long as the goal remains living in this world. 79 +CONE 2: 80 + 81 +Consumed by a passion to express myself about the 82 +AND 83 +a new existence in the world becomes possible. 84 + 85 +The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best methodologically engages in liberation theology. 86 +RAVEGE-SEUL: 87 +Revage-Seul, Mike. "Liberation Theology and the Pedagogy of Insurrection." Truthout. N.p., 11 Jan. 2016. Web. 10 Sept. 2016. 88 + 89 +“As expressed by McLaren's colleague, Ira Shor, 90 +AND 91 +right back to the one he calls "Comrade Jesus."” 92 + 93 +Liberation theology is intent based: 94 +1. 95 +2. 96 +3. 97 +4. 98 + 99 +First, extracting natural resources is part of a western spirituality that has created an ethical dualism between the environment and its subjects. This treats the environment as instrumentally valuable and propagates an epistemology based on human superiority, which is counter productive to humility in the cross. 100 +WRIGHT: 101 +“CHRISTIANITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE” By Nancy Wright UH-DD 102 + 103 +“Some feel they need to move beyond Christianity: theologian Chung Hyun Kyung writes 104 +AND 105 +because those were his concerns, too.” (11-13) 106 + 107 +Second, preeminence in nuclear power is part of a larger race towards a hegemonic framework that aims to influence global policy through power and imperial suppression. This is counter productive to a liberation theology. 108 +THOMAS: 109 +“Black Liberation Hermeneutics: A Postcoloinal Perspective” by Richard A. Thomas UH-DD 110 + 111 +“The lasting effects of the slavocracy were that the 112 +AND 113 +found within both the biblical text and through the jivanmukta.” 114 + 115 +Third, nuclear power is a modern Tower of Babel— it’s an attempt to defy the laws of the transcendent through the modification and domination of the environment carried with the belief of superiority over one’s right to do so. 116 +CALDICOTT: 117 +Caldicott, Helen. "Pope Francis Calls Nuclear Power Plants a Modern-Day Tower of Babel - Helen Caldicott, MD." Helen Caldicott MD. N.p., 25 June 2015. Web. 16 Sept. 2016. 118 + 119 +“In an audience with Japanese Bishops, 120 +AND 121 +also his critical attitude towards nuclear power.” - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-11 05:01:48.0 - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lynbrook - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +12 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Christopher Columbus Navarrete Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1- SeptOct Liberation Theology AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +St Marks
- Caselist.CitesClass[10]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,121 @@ 1 +Ethics is divided between ideal and non-ideal theory. Ideal theory ask what justice demands in a perfect world while non-ideal theory ask what justice demands in a world that is already unjust. 2 + 3 +Prefer non-ideal theory as a meta-ethical starting point: 4 + 5 +Social Ontology: Ideal theory fails to recognize that agency is political – focusing on a pre-given subject ignores our constitutive social relations. An ontology that recognizes differentiation in subjectivity is key. 6 +BUTLER: 7 +(Judith Butler. 1992. “Continent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of “Postmodernism” Feminists Theorize the Political) 8 +“In a sense, the subject is 9 +AND 10 +prior to politics itself.” 11 + 12 +2. Motivation: Ideal theory can’t guide action since its starting point has diverged from the descriptive model of the real world. Non-ideal theory is key for ethical motivation. 13 +MILLS: 14 +Charles W. Mills, “Ideal Theory” as Ideology, 2005 15 +(“Ideal Theory” as Ideology CHARLES W. MILLS 2004 UH-DD, http://www.douglasficek.com/teaching/phi-102/mills.pdf) 16 + 17 +“A first possible argument 18 +AND 19 + just completely implausible?” 20 + 21 +3. Descriptive Ideality: ideal theory ignores social realities, which in turn contradicts ideals. Normative ideals aren’t created separately from the social norms that govern us since those influence what we can count as an ideal in the first place. 22 +MILLS 2: 23 +(“Ideal Theory” as Ideology CHARLES W. MILLS 2004 UH-DD, http://www.douglasficek.com/teaching/phi-102/mills.pdf) 24 + 25 +“I suggest that this spontaneous reaction, far from 26 +AND 27 +will never be achieved.” (170) 28 + 29 +4. Standpoint Epistemology: Ideal theory strips away questions of particularities and isolates a universal feature of agents. This normalizes a single experience and epistemically skews ethical theorizing. 30 +MILLS 3: 31 +(“Ideal Theory” as Ideology CHARLES W. MILLS 2004 UH-DD, http://www.douglasficek.com/teaching/phi-102/mills.pdf) 32 + 33 +“The crucial common claim 34 +AND 35 +arrived at may be misleading.” (175) 36 + 37 +Next, prefer liberation theology as a method for overcoming non-ideal structures of inequality: 38 + 39 +Value Inversion: The death of Christ represents a paradox in Christianity where POWER is weakness BORN again through death. Liberation theology inverses the value of power itself in recognition of the cross. 40 +CONE: 41 +James Cone highly influential black theologian known for his work on black liberation theology. The Cross and The Lynching Tree. Orbis Books. 2011. 42 +“The paradox of a 43 +AND 44 +white power—with powerless love, snatching victory out of defeat.” 45 + 46 +And, since our agency isn’t independent and constantly vulnerable towards the other our subjectivity is in a constant state of apophatic negativity. Inverting supremacy through liberation theology is the only way to account for apophatism. 47 +DANIELS: 48 +Brady, Daniels. A Poststructuralist Liberation Theology? Queer Theory and Apophaticism. Union Seminary Quarterly Review. Volume 64: 2 and 3. http://usqr.utsnyc.edu/article/a-poststructuralist-liberation-theology-queer-theory-apophaticism/ 49 + 50 +“Part 3: A Potential Point of Convergence 51 +AND 52 +be more fully realized.” 53 + 54 +2. Final Critique: Only transcendence in the cross provides the final critique to supremacy by inverting our epistemological understandings of power and designating intrinsic worth towards the oppressed. Sustaining current epistemologies dooms liberation in the long term. 55 +GORMAN: 56 +Michael J the Raymond E. Brown Professor of Biblical Studies and Theology at St. Mary's Seminary and University in Baltimore, Maryland, USA, where he has taught since 1991 . Cruciformity: Paul's Narrative Spirituality of the Cross. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans Pub., 2001. Print 57 + 58 +“All other claims to or 59 +AND 60 +cross and in communities shaped by it.” 61 + 62 +3. Pessimism/Optimism Paradox: Pessimism creates a lack of motivation since it engrains the idea that nothing can ever get better because oppression is intrinsic to the very structure of recognition. Optimism fails since it ignores how pervasive oppression is to our structure. Only liberation theology allows us to both say we don’t fit into the world and yet not fall into mere skepticism. 63 +CHESTERSON: 64 +Gilbert K Chesterton. Orthodoxy. 1908. http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/130/pg130.html 65 + 66 +But the important matter was this 67 +AND 68 +and why I could feel homesick at home. 69 + 70 +4. Soul Murder: Social death provides an ontological understanding over how others perceive the subject, but it can’t account for Soul Murder. This refers to the subject psychologically internalizing a fractured conception of the self due to their experience of gratuitous oppression. 71 +MASON: 72 +John Edwin Mason PhD from Yale. Current Prof at UAV. teaches African history and the history of photography. He has written extensively on early nineteenth-century South Africa history, especially the history of slavery, South African popular culture, especially the Cape Town New Year's Carnival and jazz. Social death and Resurrection: Slavery and Emancipation in South Africa. University of Virginia Press. 2003. ISBN 0-8139-2178-3 73 + 74 +“Patterson acknowledges that 75 +AND 76 +of soul murder and social death.” 77 + 78 +And, liberation theology provides the oppressed with meaning beyond unexplainable violence. A mere hope to continue surviving in this messed up world doesn’t provide the conceptual motivation for anything to ever change as long as the goal remains living in this world. 79 +CONE 2: 80 + 81 +Consumed by a passion to express myself about the 82 +AND 83 +a new existence in the world becomes possible. 84 + 85 +The role of the ballot is to vote for the debater who best methodologically engages in liberation theology. 86 +RAVEGE-SEUL: 87 +Revage-Seul, Mike. "Liberation Theology and the Pedagogy of Insurrection." Truthout. N.p., 11 Jan. 2016. Web. 10 Sept. 2016. 88 + 89 +“As expressed by McLaren's colleague, Ira Shor, 90 +AND 91 +right back to the one he calls "Comrade Jesus."” 92 + 93 +Liberation theology is intent based: 94 +1. 95 +2. 96 +3. 97 +4. 98 + 99 +First, extracting natural resources is part of a western spirituality that has created an ethical dualism between the environment and its subjects. This treats the environment as instrumentally valuable and propagates an epistemology based on human superiority, which is counter productive to humility in the cross. 100 +WRIGHT: 101 +“CHRISTIANITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE” By Nancy Wright UH-DD 102 + 103 +“Some feel they need to move beyond Christianity: theologian Chung Hyun Kyung writes 104 +AND 105 +because those were his concerns, too.” (11-13) 106 + 107 +Second, preeminence in nuclear power is part of a larger race towards a hegemonic framework that aims to influence global policy through power and imperial suppression. This is counter productive to a liberation theology. 108 +THOMAS: 109 +“Black Liberation Hermeneutics: A Postcoloinal Perspective” by Richard A. Thomas UH-DD 110 + 111 +“The lasting effects of the slavocracy were that the 112 +AND 113 +found within both the biblical text and through the jivanmukta.” 114 + 115 +Third, nuclear power is a modern Tower of Babel— it’s an attempt to defy the laws of the transcendent through the modification and domination of the environment carried with the belief of superiority over one’s right to do so. 116 +CALDICOTT: 117 +Caldicott, Helen. "Pope Francis Calls Nuclear Power Plants a Modern-Day Tower of Babel - Helen Caldicott, MD." Helen Caldicott MD. N.p., 25 June 2015. Web. 16 Sept. 2016. 118 + 119 +“In an audience with Japanese Bishops, 120 +AND 121 +also his critical attitude towards nuclear power.” - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-11 05:01:50.696 - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lynbrook - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +13 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Christopher Columbus Navarrete Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1- SeptOct Liberation Theology AC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +St Marks
- Caselist.RoundClass[12]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +9 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-11 05:01:46.0 - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lynbrook - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,2 @@ 1 +1AC - Lib 2 +1NC - Waste Cp Regulations CP Bostrom - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +St Marks
- Caselist.RoundClass[13]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-11 05:01:49.0 - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lynbrook - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,2 @@ 1 +1AC - Lib 2 +1NC - Waste Cp Regulations CP Bostrom - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +St Marks