Changes for page Christopher Columbus Navarrete Aff
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:34
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (4 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-12-17 13:27:08. 3211 +2016-12-17 13:27:08.0
- Caselist.RoundClass[6]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-12-17 13:30:26. 1301 +2016-12-17 13:30:26.0
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-12-17 13:31:16. 1591 +2016-12-17 13:31:16.0
- Caselist.RoundClass[8]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-12-17 13:31:45. 9001 +2016-12-17 13:31:45.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[5]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,51 @@ 1 +Ought is defined as “to indicate something is probable” 2 +Prefer: 3 +1. analytic 4 +2. Analytic 5 +3. Analytic 6 + 7 +And - There many ways to interpret truth, that is dependent on how we frame action. The resolution is not a question of what the best framing is, but rather if the content of the statement is true under one. Rodl: Rödl, Sebastian. Self-Consciousness, Harvard University Press, 2007. pg. 71. 8 + 9 +This view is ...to p. 10 + 11 +Analytic 12 + 13 +I contend that the multiple worlds interpretation of metaphysics is true. The implication is that if MWI is true, then I have fulfilled my burden, as the resolution is a logical consequence. 14 + 15 +First – if MWI is true, you affirm. Monton: 16 + 17 +Fred is not ...hit a bullseye. 18 + 19 +Next is endless doppelgängers. Best estimates prove universe is infinite. Bostrom: 20 + 21 +In the standard ... review, see 2. 22 + 23 +Third – Endless repetition is guaranteed in an infinite universe. Greene: 24 + 25 +In an infinite ...cosmos—necessarily repeat. 26 + 27 +Fourth – Risk of MWI always out-weighs – key to avoiding quantum collapse. Vaidman: 28 + 29 +The reason for ... Pitowsky 2001. 30 + 31 + 32 +Underview 1 is Trivialism. 33 + 34 +Only trivialism avoids an infinite regress. Kabay 35 + 36 +Let us define ...nontrivial beings. 37 + 38 +Second, negating in a speech act has certain constraints. 39 +Kabay 2 40 + 41 +Denial is a speech ...components being present. 42 + 43 +The speech act of negating fails because even arguing for not trivialism is consistent with trivialism. 44 +Kabay 3 45 + 46 +But given that ...one can assert. 47 + 48 +Two impacts: A) there is no reason against trivialism, and B) it justifies affirming. 49 +Kabay 4 50 + 51 +In addition, the...of the trivialist. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-12-17 13:31:47.541 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +any - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +8 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Christopher Columbus Navarrete Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1ac - mwi - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +strake