K

The only ethical demand is one that calls for the end of the world. Their narrative of future legislative progress reproduces anti-blackness and prevents a paradigmatic analysis of modernity – the promise of "the future" prevents a full confrontation with the violence of the present because it creates the possibility of relief "to come" – only understanding time as anti-black accumulation can index existing conditions of violence

Dillon 13 (Stephen Dillon, assistant professor of Queer Studies @ Hampshire, ""It's here, it's that time:" Race, queer futurity, and the temporality of violence in Born in Flames", Women & Performance: a journal of feminist theory, 2013)
According to Spillers, the anti-blackness inaugurated under chattel slavery is a death
AND
what the future will be. The future will be what was before.

The 1AC is the perfection of the slave

Farley 5 ~[Boston College (Anthony, "Perfecting Slavery", http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=lsfp)~~]
Slavery is with us still. We are haunted by slavery. We are animated
AND
beyond the veil, beyond death; hence, the end of forever.  

The law contains the pleasure of whiteness, and through it we see ourselves as masters and slaves. Oppressors fall into the pattern of enjoying the white-over-black dynamic. We need to remember that it will be easy to fall back into the past.

Farley 02, Prof @ Albany Law School, 2002 (Anthony P., 2002, "The Poetics of Colorlined Space," p. 99)
Race is a form of bodily pleasure, akin to sexuality. "Look,
AND
on; boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past." 

The affirmative rhetorical silence on whiteness is an active stance that allows white privilege to thrive by masking its existence and treating is as an assumed norm.

DR. CRENSHAW 1997
(Prof of Speech Comm @ Univ. Ala.  Carrie-PhD. USC; former director @ Univ. of Ala.; WESTERN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION)
This analysis brings into focus several observations about how whiteness operates rhetorically and ideologically in
AND
the ideology of white privilege "works" through rhetorical silence about whiteness.

Fiat is Anti-Black

Reid-Brinkley 2008 ~[Dr. Shanara Reid-Brinkley, "The Harsh Realities of "Acting Black": How African-American Policy Debaters Negotiate Representation Through Racial Performance and Style", P. 15~]MHELLIE
Genre Violation Four: Policymaker as Impersonal and the Rhetoric of Personal Experience. Debate
AND
of the "policymaker" and require their opponents to do the same.

Blackness is Ontological - Objective anti-Black violence is the structural base for all conflicts. Nothing can outweigh.

Wilderson 11 (Frank, Associate Professor, African American Studies Dept., UC Irvine, "The Vengeance of Vertigo: Aphasia and Abjection in the Political Trials of Black Insurgents", InTensions, Vol 5, http://www.yorku.ca/intent/issue5/articles/frankbwildersoniii.php~~#footxvii, LK)
 ~[2~] With only small arms and crude explosives at their disposal,
AND
zone offers me sanctuary. I want to stop and turn myself in. 

The alternative is to endorse an unflinching paradigmatic analysis that allows us to overthrow the status quo.

Wilderson, '10
~[2010, Frank B. Wilderson is an Associate Professor of African-American Studies at UC Irvine and has a Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, "Red, White & Black: Cinema and the Structure of U.S. Antagonisms,"~]
STRANGE AS it might seem, this book project began in South Africa. During
AND
, Andile Mngxitama, Prishani Naidoo, John Shai, and S'bu Zulu. 

Case

The claim that free speech leads to democratic debate and social progress is a neoliberal myth – the AFF's faith in the free exchange of ideas displaces a focus on direct action and re-entrenches multiple forms of oppression.

Tillett-Saks 13 Andrew Tillett-Saks (Labor organizer and critical activist author for Truth-Out and Counterpunch), Neoliberal Myths, Counterpunch, 11/7/13, http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/11/07/neoliberal-myths/ LADI
In the wake of the Brown University shout-down of Ray Kelly, champion
AND
greater freedom. To the contrary, direct action has always proved necessary. 

No internal link between the plan text and the solvency – Vote neg on presumption

Schlag 90 (Pierre Schlag, professor of law@ univ. Colorado, stanford law review, november, page lexis)
In fact, normative legal thought is so much in a hurry that it will
AND
in a position to put any of its wonderful normative advice into effect.

The affirmative relegates the question of the actor to a place of fiction – their understanding of debate is reflective of a Socratic notion of de-subjectification that makes life-affirmation impossible

Antonio 95. Robert, July 1995, "Nietzsche's antisociology: Subjectified Culture and the End of History", American Journal of Sociology, Volume 101, No. 1
Treating words as mirrors of reality provides a comforting illusion of "certainty." This
AND
and overreaching and untrammeled ressentiment paves the way for a new type of tyrant

Externalizing ethics onto legal institutions trades off with personal ethics

Rozo 4 (Diego, MA in philosophy and Cultural Analysis @ U of Amsterdam, Forgiving the Unforgivable: On Violence, Power, and the Possibility of Justice, p. 19-21, http://www.banrepcultural.org/blaavirtual/tesis/colfuturo/Forgiving%20the%20Unforgivable.pdf)//LA *We don't endorse gendered language.
Within the legal order the relations between individuals will resemble this logic where suffering is
AND
– the law infiltrates into and seeks to rule our most private conflicts.

Hate speech has intrinsic harm, particularly against women—turns case

Horne 16 (Solveig, Minister of Children and Equality in Norway, "Hate Speech — A Threat to Freedom of Speech," 03/08/2016, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/solveig-horne/hate-speech—a-threat-to_b_9406596.html LADI)
Hate speech in the public sphere takes place online and offline, and affects young
AND
in the public debate must show responsibility and actively work against hate speech.

Hate speech is protected under the 1^st amendment

Volokh 15 (Eugene, reporter @ the Washington Post, "No, there's no "hate speech" exception to the First Amendment," May 7, 2015, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/07/no-theres-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/?utm_term=.779cdacd2341/ LADI)
I keep hearing about a supposed "hate speech" exception to the First Amendment
AND
Calif. L. Rev. 297, 330-31 (1988).