| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,62 @@ |
|
1 |
+===Indigenous CP=== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+====CP Text: Indigenous communities should individually decide for themselves whether they want to prohibit the production of nuclear power in their territory.==== |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+====The CP is Functionally Competitive— not every indigenous group will want to prohibit production. ==== |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+====The CP also competes through net benefits. ==== |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+====1^^st^^-==== |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+====Legislation that just lumps the Native Americans in with everyone else and makes governmental decisions for them causes the problem. ==== |
|
17 |
+**Larson 05 ** |
|
18 |
+, member of the Gros Ventre tribe and director of American Indian Studies at Idaho State University, 2005 (Sidner J., "Making Sense of Federal Indian Law", Wicazo Sa Review, Spring, 20.1: 9-21. EKC) |
|
19 |
+At the same time, there is a folding of federal Indian law into general |
|
20 |
+AND |
|
21 |
+tribal values with regard to such things as environmental issues seem very positive. |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+ |
|
24 |
+====And this lumping excludes their voices because we pretend like they're just any other interest group that does not deserve a voice in the discussion. ==== |
|
25 |
+**Endres '09** |
|
26 |
+Endres, Assistant Professor of Communication at the University of Utah, 2009 (Danielle, "The Rhetoric of Nuclear Colonialism: Rhetorical Exclusion of American Indian Arguments in the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Siting Decision," Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies. March, Vol. 6, No. 1, Page 50, MAG) |
|
27 |
+Instead of explicitly naming American Indians as "savages" (a common strategy indentified |
|
28 |
+AND |
|
29 |
+be asked to sacrifice their lands for the greater good of the nation. |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+ |
|
32 |
+====Domestic, dependent nation status is a racist and genocidal arrangement. The legal system itself is based on European notions of property and hierarchy that were responsible for the taking of land in the first place. It has allowed violations of every right. ==== |
|
33 |
+**Williams, 86** |
|
34 |
+ (Robert, Professor at University of Arizona College of Law, 1986 Wis. L. Rev. 219, March/April, THE ALGEBRA OF FEDERAL INDIAN LAW: THE HARD TRAIL O DECOLONIZING AND AMERICANIZING THE WHITE MAN'S INDIAN JURISPRUDENCE). |
|
35 |
+Therefore, once a European nation firmly established its occupancy of territories discovered in the |
|
36 |
+AND |
|
37 |
+the overriding superior sovereignty of their "conqueror," 127 the United States. |
|
38 |
+ |
|
39 |
+ |
|
40 |
+====2^^nd^^-==== |
|
41 |
+ |
|
42 |
+ |
|
43 |
+====The government only reduces their infringement on native lands when it is convenient—the Aff is no way re-instates sovereignty— it just contributes to the cycle. ==== |
|
44 |
+**Johnson 15** |
|
45 |
+Johnson, Mitchell. "Circumventing Native American Sovereignty." Brown Political Review. N.p., 16 Jan. 2015. Web. 6 Sept. 2016 |
|
46 |
+The disappointing decisions of the federal government in the face of lucrative energy prospects are |
|
47 |
+AND |
|
48 |
+upholding our strong and crucial nation-to-nation relationship." I\ |
|
49 |
+ |
|
50 |
+ |
|
51 |
+====3^^rd^^- ==== |
|
52 |
+ |
|
53 |
+ |
|
54 |
+====The government should not decide what is right for natives. Even one incidence of native's wanting nuclear power is sufficient to prove the CP. ==== |
|
55 |
+ |
|
56 |
+ |
|
57 |
+====Nuclear Power will end the cycle of poverty for some tribes – it's safe and helps brings people back to the lands—this is coming from a tribal leader. ==== |
|
58 |
+**Hebert 06** |
|
59 |
+Hebert, Josef. "Store Nuclear Waste on Reservation? Tribe Split." Msnbc.com. N.p., 27 June 2006. Web. 24 Aug. 2016. |
|
60 |
+SKULL VALLEY, Utah — Leon Bear, a stocky man in T-shirt |
|
61 |
+AND |
|
62 |
+, but this will bring many of the others back, he predicts. |