| ... |
... |
@@ -1,19
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-Interpretation: Debaters can only defend resolutional action and nothing more. To clarify, you cannot be extra-T. |
| 2 |
|
-Violation: The affirmative is extra-topical. Two warrants: |
| 3 |
|
-1. PART OF THE SOLVENCY COMES FROM CREATING THE ABILITY TO SUE POLICE UNDER THE ADA. AFFIRMING REQUIRES APPLYING THE ADA TO ARRESTS, AN APPROACH THAT NOT ALL COURTS SUPPORT. Auner 16 |
| 4 |
|
-Thomas J. Auner (JD at Loyola Law), For the Protection of Society's Most Vulnerable, the ADA Should Apply to Arrests, 49 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 335 (2016) |
| 5 |
|
-Fortunately, courts began taking ... protections for the mentally ill. |
| 6 |
|
-2. This would require OVERRULING THE SHEEHAN DECISION which IS EXTRA TOPICAL. IT INVOLVES MORE THAN THE QUESTION OF QI. THE QUESTION IS ABOUT WHETHER POLICE HAVE TO MODIFY PROCEDURES FOR THOSE WITH DISABILITIES. ACLU 15 |
| 7 |
|
-ACLU, 2/13/15, https://www.aclu.org/cases/city-and-county-san-francisco-v-sheehan, City and County San Francisco vs. Sheehan. |
| 8 |
|
- Whether the ADA's requirement ... appropriate procedures are followed. |
| 9 |
|
-Extra T is a voter: |
| 10 |
|
-1. Ground. |
| 11 |
|
-Limits. |
| 12 |
|
-3. Jurisdiction. |
| 13 |
|
-4. Topical version of the aff |
| 14 |
|
-Voters: |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
-Vote on fairness |
| 17 |
|
- |
| 18 |
|
-Use competing interps—reasonability |
| 19 |
|
-And no RVIs |