| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,22 @@ |
|
1 |
+Framework: The standard is consistency with universal freedom. |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+First, an agent’s will acts on a law that it gives to itself. If pleasure were a law to you, then you would straightaway do the pleasurable act, but since you’re autonomous, you can reason about taking the action. Thus a condition of action is that the will is self-determined. KORSGAARD: |
|
4 |
+“Self-Constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant” by Christine M. Korsgaard LW-DD |
|
5 |
+“Now I’m going to ... on which you act.” (123) |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+And, a rational will must set ends within a system of reciprocal constraints. Anything else justifies that someone could impede your ability to achieve your end in the first place, which also means reason constrains end-based frameworks. SIYAR: |
|
8 |
+Jamsheed Aiam Siyar: Kant’s Conception of Practical Reason. Tufts University, 1999 LW-DD |
|
9 |
+“Recall that insofar ... it as constraining my actions.” (80-81) |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+Analytic |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+Impact Calc |
|
14 |
+Contention: |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+Freedom requires an omnilateral will to resolve inherent rights disputes. RIPSTEIN: |
|
17 |
+“Kant on Law and Justice” by Arthur Ripstein |
|
18 |
+“Kant’s point about ... act of instituting it.” (13) |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+And, law enforcement is an extension of an omnilateral will acting on the intent to serve the public interest. RIPSTEIN 2: |
|
21 |
+“Force and Freedom Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy” Arthur Ripstein Harvard University Press 2009 |
|
22 |
+“Kant’s solution to these ... police officers as a whole. |