Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[7]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[7]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,44 +1,0 @@
1		-In order for an action to be moral, it must first be willed universally:
2		-1. An agent’s will acts on a law that it gives to itself. If pleasure were a law to you, then you would straightaway do the pleasurable act, but since you’re autonomous, you can reason about taking the action. Thus a condition of action is that the will is self-determined. KORSGAARD:
3		-“Self-Constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant” by Christine M. Korsgaard
4		-“It remains to show ... on which you act.” (120-123)
5		-
6		-And, only universally willing can be self-determined. KORSGAARD 2:
7		-“Self-Constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant” by Christine M. Korsgaard
8		-“The second step is ... an action of something within him.” (123-124)
9		-And, this also proves an intent foresight distinction. Foreseen effects are independent of what an agent determines because the consequences themselves are dependent upon things external to the will so only intentions can be self determined.
10		-2. Actions are expressions of an agent’s reasoning from their end to the means, which unifies their action into a cohesive movement as opposed to fragmented steps.
11		-ROEDL:
12		-Sebastian Roedl. Prof. Of Philosophy, University of Leipzig. “Two Forms of Practical Knowledge and Their Unity” in Ford and Hornsby, Eds. Essays on Anscombe's Intention (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011) 239.
13		-“We can give a more ... conscious of her nexus.”
14		-
15		-The sufficient negative burden is to prove that prohibiting the production of nuclear power cannot be willed as a universal principle.
16		-
17		-Contention:
18		-No empirical object is intrinsically valuable. Their value lies only in relationship to rational agency. KANT:
19		-Immanuel Kant founder of analytic philosophy “Critique of Pure Reason” 1781
20		-“We have therefore ... coerce everyone else.
21		-
22		-Analytic
23		-Analytic
24		-
25		-Using the particular to inform the universal is key. Critique versus racist ideology is hopeless. Only the NC allows change because a common and binding feature is present. PENSKY:
26		-“The Cambridge Companion to Habermas” by Stephen K. White 1995
27		-“The universalist kernel ... means something like the basic
28		-shared mentality that allows individuals to conceive of themselves
29		-as citizens of a democratic state, one in which citizenship consists
30		-of a constellation of interlocking duties and rights that together form an abstract level of popular sovereignty subsisting below - and making possible the spectrum of particularistic kinds of identity operating within a diverse society. In democratic societies, the capacity for mutual recognition and the generalization of norms must install itself as an attitude that can reflectively separate from the particular fabric of their own interest.”
31		-
32		-2. Connecting text to the real world is key to produce social change. A “straight away” revolutionary approach is doomed since it lacks self-reflection. Refusal to engage in theory turns their argument. SMITH and EATON:
33		-“Role of reflection and praxis in community-based learning and social justice work” by Toby Smith and Marie Eaton http://cielearn.org/wp-content/themes/ciel/docs/Praxis_Social20Justice202-10.pdf
34		-“If reflection is an ... what we do, between text and our lives. ”
35		-
36		-3. The Kantian subject is the embodied subject—universalizability is essential to mutual recognition of others. FARR:
37		-Arnold Farr (prof of phil @ UKentucky, focusing on German idealism, philosophy of race, postmodernism, psychoanalysis, and liberation philosophy). “Can a Philosophy of Race Afford to Abandon the Kantian Categorical Imperative?” JOURNAL of SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY, Vol. 33 No. 1, Spring 2002, 17–32.
38		-“One of the most ... other moral agents.
39		-
40		-
41		-Challenging Racism
42		-The categorical imperative is key to challenging racism—incorporating abstraction is key. FARR:
43		- Arnold Farr (prof of phil @ UKentucky, focusing on German idealism, philosophy of race, postmodernism, psychoanalysis, and liberation philosophy). “Can a Philosophy of Race Afford to Abandon the Kantian Categorical Imperative?” JOURNAL of SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY, Vol. 33 No. 1, Spring 2002, 17–32.philosophy of race, postmodernism,
44		-Whereas most criticisms are aimed at the formulation of universal ... first exploring its emancipatory potential.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-09-18 14:53:40.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Lawrence Zhou

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Harvard-Westlake JD

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-4

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-6

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Cedar Park Grosch Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Sept Oct Kant NC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Greenhill