| ... |
... |
@@ -1,21
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-LINK – THERE’S NO REASON TO VOTE AFF – THEY CAN’T ARTICULATE ANY LINKAGE BETWEEN THEIR PRESCRIPTIONS AND PRACTICAL, WORLDLY EFFECTS |
| 2 |
|
-SCHLAG, PROFESSOR OF LAW @ UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, 90 (PIERRE, STANFORD LAW REVIEW, NOVEMBER) |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-In fact, normative ... advice into effect. |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
-B. IMPACT – |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
-1. NO SOLVENCY – THEIR DESCRIPTION OF THE STATUS QUO PRESUPPOSES A RATIONAL, AUTONOMOUS SUBJECT THAT NOT ONLY DESCRIBES THE BUREAUCRACY BUT ALSO OUR AGENCY, TO ACT AS EMPOWERED CARTESIAN EGOS – IN REALITY, THESE SUBJECT POSITIONS DON’T EXIST |
| 9 |
|
-SCHLAG, PROFESSOR OF LAW @ UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, 91 (PIERRE, SYMPOSIUM: THE CRITIQUE OF NORMATIVITY: ARTICLE: NORMATIVITY AND THE POLITICS OF FORM, 139 U. PA. L. REV. 801, APRIL) |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-For these legal thinkers, ... their own texts. It isn't so5 |
| 12 |
|
- |
| 13 |
|
-2. SOLVENCY’S TURNED – THEIR RHETORICAL PERFORMANCE SHIELDS US FROM RESPONSIBILITY FOR OUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO MATERIAL PAIN AND SUFFERING |
| 14 |
|
-DELGADO, CHARLES INGLIS THOMSON PROFESSOR OF LAW @ UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, 91 (RICHARD, SYMPOSIUM: THE CRITIQUE OF NORMATIVITY: ARTICLE: NORMS AND NORMAL SCIENCE: TOWARD A CRITIQUE OF NORMATIVITY IN LEGAL THOUGHT, 139 U. PA. L. REV. 933, APRIL) |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
-Normativity may be ... make a claim on us. |
| 17 |
|
- |
| 18 |
|
-C. ALTERNATIVE – AFFIRM THE 1AC RHETORICAL STRATEGY BUT REJECT THE PLAN – REFUSING THE TEMPTATION TO SUPPORT NORMATIVE LEGAL THOUGHT OPENS UP SPACE TO RECOGNIZE THE BRUTALITY BENEATH THE LIBERAL HUMANIST MASK OF THE STATE |
| 19 |
|
-DELGADO, CHARLES INGLIS THOMSON PROFESSOR OF LAW @ UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, 91 (RICHARD, SYMPOSIUM: THE CRITIQUE OF NORMATIVITY: ARTICLE: NORMS AND NORMAL SCIENCE: TOWARD A CRITIQUE OF NORMATIVITY IN LEGAL THOUGHT, 139 U. PA. L. REV. 933, APRIL) |
| 20 |
|
- |
| 21 |
|
-Well, then, what ... and focus on this. |