Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[3]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[6]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[3]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-09-17 18:37:20.926
	1	+2016-09-17 18:37:20.0

Caselist.CitesClass[6]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,21 @@
	1	+LINK – THERE’S NO REASON TO VOTE AFF – THEY CAN’T ARTICULATE ANY LINKAGE BETWEEN THEIR PRESCRIPTIONS AND PRACTICAL, WORLDLY EFFECTS
	2	+SCHLAG, PROFESSOR OF LAW @ UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, 90 (PIERRE, STANFORD LAW REVIEW, NOVEMBER)
	3	+
	4	+In fact, normative ... advice into effect.
	5	+
	6	+B. IMPACT –
	7	+
	8	+1. NO SOLVENCY – THEIR DESCRIPTION OF THE STATUS QUO PRESUPPOSES A RATIONAL, AUTONOMOUS SUBJECT THAT NOT ONLY DESCRIBES THE BUREAUCRACY BUT ALSO OUR AGENCY, TO ACT AS EMPOWERED CARTESIAN EGOS – IN REALITY, THESE SUBJECT POSITIONS DON’T EXIST
	9	+SCHLAG, PROFESSOR OF LAW @ UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, 91 (PIERRE, SYMPOSIUM: THE CRITIQUE OF NORMATIVITY: ARTICLE: NORMATIVITY AND THE POLITICS OF FORM, 139 U. PA. L. REV. 801, APRIL)
	10	+
	11	+For these legal thinkers, ... their own texts. It isn't so5
	12	+
	13	+2. SOLVENCY’S TURNED – THEIR RHETORICAL PERFORMANCE SHIELDS US FROM RESPONSIBILITY FOR OUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO MATERIAL PAIN AND SUFFERING
	14	+DELGADO, CHARLES INGLIS THOMSON PROFESSOR OF LAW @ UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, 91 (RICHARD, SYMPOSIUM: THE CRITIQUE OF NORMATIVITY: ARTICLE: NORMS AND NORMAL SCIENCE: TOWARD A CRITIQUE OF NORMATIVITY IN LEGAL THOUGHT, 139 U. PA. L. REV. 933, APRIL)
	15	+
	16	+Normativity may be ... make a claim on us.
	17	+
	18	+C. ALTERNATIVE – AFFIRM THE 1AC RHETORICAL STRATEGY BUT REJECT THE PLAN – REFUSING THE TEMPTATION TO SUPPORT NORMATIVE LEGAL THOUGHT OPENS UP SPACE TO RECOGNIZE THE BRUTALITY BENEATH THE LIBERAL HUMANIST MASK OF THE STATE
	19	+DELGADO, CHARLES INGLIS THOMSON PROFESSOR OF LAW @ UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, 91 (RICHARD, SYMPOSIUM: THE CRITIQUE OF NORMATIVITY: ARTICLE: NORMS AND NORMAL SCIENCE: TOWARD A CRITIQUE OF NORMATIVITY IN LEGAL THOUGHT, 139 U. PA. L. REV. 933, APRIL)
	20	+
	21	+Well, then, what ... and focus on this.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-09-17 18:37:22.236

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Alberto Tohme

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Cypress Woods CJ

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Cedar Park Grosch Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Sept Oct Legal Normativity K

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Greenhill