Changes for page Cambridge Rindge Sussman Neg
Summary
-
Objects (2 modified, 5 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[87]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-03-25 20:46:29. 7581 +2017-03-25 20:46:29.0
- Caselist.RoundClass[43]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +87,88,89
- Caselist.CitesClass[88]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,7 @@ 1 +Interpretation: Debaters may only read positions that are disclosed before the debate on their NDCA wiki page under their own name with full citations, tags, and first three/last three words. 2 + 3 +Interpretation: Debaters must disclose previously run constructive positions – all cases, off cases and theory arguments – at least 30 minutes before the round on the NDCA wiki or when asked. This means providing proper citations for all evidence including first three and last three words and tags as well as advocacy, standard, and interpretation texts. 4 + 5 +Interpretation: Affirmatives may only read cases that have been disclosed at least 15 minutes before the round as the case that they will read. 6 + 7 +Interpretation - Debaters must disclose tags, cites, and first three/last three words for all evidence for affirmative cases where the criterion requires a descriptive debate over legal precedent or standards, with theoretical warrants, AND where there is a role of the ballot of to vote for the debater who best justifies their advocacy through contextualizing legal norms. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-25 20:46:30.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +all - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +all - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +43 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Cambridge Rindge Sussman Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - disclosure theory - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +all
- Caselist.CitesClass[89]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,23 @@ 1 +Any burden structure must require both debaters to defend just the truth or falsity of the resolution. To clarify, they can’t read a burden of: the aff burden is to prove that we an obligation to future generations, while the neg burden is to prove that we have an obligation not to be concerned with future generations. In addition, neither debater may read necessary but insufficient burdens. 2 + 3 +If the aff says “No link to implementation args cause I’ll defend those – they aren’t relevant to affirming/negating the burden” in the 1AC, they can’t tell me during my prep that they won’t grant me links to disads. 4 + 5 +Debaters may not represent two different passages from a scholarly source as one continuous card. 6 + 7 +The aff must read a solvency advocate that explicitly advocates all planks of the plan. 8 + 9 +The aff must read a solvency advocate, i.e. a piece of evidence from the topic literature, that advocates—and only advocates—for every plank of a topical plan. 10 + 11 +If the aff reads a standard of “upholding the procedures of justice,” they must define what procedures of justice are. 12 + 13 +Aff may not say "The role of the judge and ballot is to vote for the debater who best stops alienation." 14 + 15 +If the aff reads a normatively justified framework, they cannot read reasons why philosophical education is bad in the 1AR. 16 + 17 +The aff may not read a determinism trigger. To clarify, they may not argue that “If individuals did not have the ability to will ends, then determinism is true,” which would mean “We can’t make moral claims about the resolution and there are no obligations to restrict, in which case you affirm on face.” 18 + 19 +The aff needs a standard, value criterion, or role of the ballot text. 20 + 21 +Frameworks must have explicit value criterion texts or a concrete explanation of weighing underneath the framework. 22 + 23 +Frameworks must establish sufficient burdens for both debaters via equal turn ground. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-25 20:46:31.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +all - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +all - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +43 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Cambridge Rindge Sussman Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - broken interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +all
- Caselist.CitesClass[90]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,12 @@ 1 +====Counterplan text: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected journalist speech, except they ought to retain restrictions on nudity.==== 2 +**Erickson 16 **"Topless photos in Montana high school newspaper violated policy" 2-2-16, http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/topless-photos-in-montana-high-school-newspaper-violated-policy/article_b3bf9e9f-c1a6-553b-a086-283e5c77c7e1.html 3 +MISSOULA — A Missoula County Public Schools district investigation has determined a recent edition of 4 +AND 5 +actions were not taken by the teacher of the course nor the principal." 6 + 7 + 8 +====Net benefit - nudity can be triggering.==== 9 +**Breezy 15 **Breezy 816, "My Trigger Is Nudity - How Will I Survive In Today's World?!" 3-30-15, https://www.myptsd.com/c/threads/my-trigger-is-nudity-how-will-i-survive-in-todays-world.52299/ 10 +I am reaching out to try and find a way to cope with my trigger 11 +AND 12 +experienced the intense flooding of emotion that is followed by anger towards him. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-25 20:48:35.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +qi, castillo - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +harvard westlake sp - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +44 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Cambridge Rindge Sussman Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +jf - cp - nudity pic - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +kandi king
- Caselist.RoundClass[44]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +90 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-25 20:48:32.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +qi, castillo - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +harvard westlake sp - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +kandi king
- Caselist.RoundClass[45]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-25 21:14:29.447 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +sims, hunt - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +dulles aw - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +kandi king