Changes for page Cambridge Rindge Sussman Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:34
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[80]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-02-20 05:11:40. 51 +2017-02-20 05:11:40.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[81]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,34 @@ 1 +====Interpretation: Aff can’t defend that public colleges and universities ought not restrict a particular type or types of constitutionally protected speech.==== 2 + 3 + 4 +====In negative forms, "any" is indefinite—it doesn't allow for exceptions==== 5 +**Cambridge Dictionary** ~~Cambridge Dictionary, "Any," http://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/quantifiers/any.~~ AG 6 +Any as a determiner has two forms: a strong form and a weak form 7 +AND 8 +: We could choose any colours we wanted. (+ plural countable noun) 9 + 10 + 11 +====Violation:==== 12 + 13 + 14 +====~~1~~ Precision—three impacts==== 15 + 16 + 17 +====A~~ Predictability==== 18 + 19 + 20 +====B~~ Topicality rule—precision independently outweighs ==== 21 +**Nebel '15 **(Jake, "The Priority of Resolutional Semantics," 2/20/15, http://vbriefly.com/2015/02/20/the-priority-of-resolutional-semantics-by-jake-nebel/) 22 +One reason why LDers may be suspicious of my view is because they see topicality 23 +AND 24 +the first premise, not the second premise, in the argument above. 25 + 26 + 27 +====~~2~~ Limits==== 28 + 29 + 30 +====~~3~~ Ground—their interp justifies unbeatable affs.==== 31 +**Eckert 16** ~~Eckert, Bennett. "Topic Analysis by Bennett Eckert." Champion Briefs: Jan/Feb 2017. 2016~~ AG 32 +This is potentially the most frustrating word in the topic. Merriam-Webster's first 33 +AND 34 +discussion in the next two sections on affirmatives that defend the whole resolution. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-20 05:11:40.726 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +smith, song, fickess - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +dulles mk - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +40 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Triples - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Cambridge Rindge Sussman Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +jf - t - any - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +harvard