| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,12 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Counterplan text: Resolved: Public colleges and universities ought to adopt the 1989 University of Wisconsin System speech rule.==== |
|
2 |
+**U.S. District Court E.D. Wisconsin 91 clarifies** ~~United States District Court E.D. Wisconsin, a bunch of judges—probably pretty qualified, 10-11-1991, "UWM Post v. Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin", http://cdn.publicinterestnetwork.org/assets/mdGVXR4xIIPFiNRwRkQzyg/SPEECH-CODES-UWM-POST-V-REGENTS.pdf~~ AG |
|
3 |
+Thus, in order to be regulated under the UW Rule, a comment, |
|
4 |
+AND |
|
5 |
+some illustrations of situations where the UW Rule applies and does not apply: |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+====Mutually exclusive—the rule's unconstitutional.==== |
|
9 |
+**FIRE n.d.** ~~FIRE, no date, "State of the Law: Speech Codes", FIRE, https://www.thefire.org/in-court/state-of-the-law-speech-codes/~~ AG brackets in original |
|
10 |
+UWM Post v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin, 774 F |
|
11 |
+AND |
|
12 |
+to have little value and great costs, amounts to governmental thought control." |