Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[29]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[57]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[29]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2017-01-14 15:50:46.753
	1	+2017-01-14 15:50:46.0

Caselist.CitesClass[57]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,53 @@
	1	+**====There must be a right to set ends, otherwise ethics is incoherent since it assumes subjects deliberate between multiple possible courses of action. However, to prevent this right from becoming contingent, we must have a conception of property.====**
	2	+**Buck '87** (Wayne, Yale, "Kant's Justification of Private Property." In New Essays on Kant. Ed. den Ouden, 227-244.) OS
	3	+(1) Because human beings have the right to pursue their ends (i
	4	+AND
	5	+-365~~). Let us call this intelligible or 'noumenal' relation "ownership."
	6	+
	7	+
	8	+**====Next, property requires the existence of the general will—rights in the state of nature are provisional, and disputes could only be resolved through unilateral coercion. That means the state is legitimate in coercively enforcing rights claims.====**
	9	+**Korsgaard '08 **(Christine, "Taking the Law into Our Own Hands: Kant on the Right to Revolution," in The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology) OS bracketed for gender
	10	+Kant also believes that there is a sense in which we have rights in the
	11	+AND
	12	+, is to settle the particular dispute in question in some lawful way.
	13	+
	14	+
	15	+**====The actor is the state—public colleges and universities are founded and operated by the state.====**
	16	+**Collegebound writes** "Differences Between Public and Private Universities and Liberal Arts Colleges" http://www.collegebound.net/content/article/differences-between-public-and-private-universities-and-liberal-arts-colleges/18529/
	17	+In the US, most public institutions are state universities founded and operated by state
	18	+AND
	19	+universities began as teacher training schools and eventually were expanded into comprehensive universities.
	20	+
	21	+
	22	+====Thus, the standard is maintaining a system of equal outer freedom. ====
	23	+
	24	+
	25	+====Contention:====
	26	+
	27	+
	28	+====~~1~~ The state should regulate hate speech to promote equal freedom.====
	29	+**Varden 10** ~~Helga Varden, Associate Professor of Philosophy and Associate Professor of Gender and Women's Studies @ U of Illinois, 5-22-2010, Academia.edu, https://www.academia.edu/2006079/A_Kantian_Conception_of_Free_Speech~~ AG
	30	+On the Kantian view I have been developing, hate speech and speech amounting to
	31	+AND
	32	+public debate and reflection followed by public regulation on behalf of all citizens.
	33	+
	34	+
	35	+====Hate speech is constitutionally protected.====
	36	+**Volokh 15** (Eugene, reporter @ the Washington Post, "No, there's no "hate speech" exception to the First Amendment," May 7, 2015, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/07/no-theres-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/?utm_term=.779cdacd2341/ //LADI)
	37	+I keep hearing about a supposed "hate speech" exception to the First Amendment
	38	+AND
	39	+Calif. L. Rev. 297, 330-31 (1988).
	40	+
	41	+
	42	+====~~2~~ Seditious speech amounts to having a right to end the omnilateral will, which makes freedom impossible.====
	43	+**Varden 10** ~~Helga Varden, Associate Professor of Philosophy and Associate Professor of Gender and Women's Studies @ U of Illinois, 5-22-2010, Academia.edu, https://www.academia.edu/2006079/A_Kantian_Conception_of_Free_Speech~~ AG
	44	+To understand Kant's condemnation of seditious speech, remember that Kant, as mentioned above
	45	+AND
	46	+qua private citizens, it is a public crime (6: 331)
	47	+
	48	+
	49	+====Seditious speech is constitutionally protected.====
	50	+**Justia n.d.** ~~Justia, "Seditious Speech and Seditious Libel", http://law.justia.com/constitution/us/amendment-01/41-seditious-speech.html~~ AG
	51	+Seditious Speech and Seditious Libel.—Opposition to government through speech alone has been subject
	52	+AND
	53	+in Madison's view, a fundamental principle of the American form of government.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2017-01-14 15:50:48.737

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+amos jeng

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+american heritage dm

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+29

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Cambridge Rindge Sussman Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+jf - nc - omnilateral will

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+lex