Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[39]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[39]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,37 +1,0 @@
1		-====Ought is "used to express logical consequence" as defined by Merriam-Webster (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ought) so the neg burden is to prove that limitations on qualified immunity won't logically happen in the status quo, and the aff burden is to prove that they will. Prefer my interp:====
2		-
3		-
4		-====~~A~~ Reciprocity====
5		-
6		-
7		-====~~B~~ Neg ground====
8		-
9		-
10		-====~~C~~ Resolvability—A~~ analytic, B~~ moral framework debate is impossible.====
11		-**Joyce 02 **Joyce, Richard. Myth of Morality. Port Chester, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2002. p 45-47.
12		-This distinction between what is accepted from within an institution, and "stepping out
13		-AND
14		-count as evidence that would sway the debate one way or the other.
15		-
16		-
17		-====~~D~~ Aff ground—moral knowledge is inaccessible, so they'll always lose under their interp.====
18		-**Wittgenstein** Ludwig, "Lecture on Ethics" Moral Discourse and Practice: Some Philosophical Approaches pg, 67
19		-Now what I wish to contend is that, although all judgments of relative value
20		-AND
21		-, in any absolute sense, are sublime, important, or trivial.
22		-
23		-
24		-====~~E~~ Education====
25		-
26		-
27		-====~~F~~ Text====
28		-
29		-
30		-====I contend that limiting qualified immunity won't happen.====
31		-
32		-
33		-====The trend is going the other way—SCOTUS is expanding qualified immunity.====
34		-**Kinports '16** (Kit, Penn State Law, "The Supreme Court's Quiet Expansion of Qualified Immunity," Minnesota Law Review, 2016) OS
35		-In recent years the Supreme Court opinions applying the qualified immunity defense have engaged in
36		-AND
37		-entirely the Court's creation, devoid of support in § 1983's legislative history.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-11-05 17:15:05.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-mark ahlstrom

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-valley kk

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-19

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-5

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Cambridge Rindge Sussman Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-nd - nc - logical consequence

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-apple valley