| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,17 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Interpretation: The aff must specify who pays for damages resulting from successful lawsuits in a world of limited qualified immunity.==== |
|
2 |
+**Bernick '15 clarifies 3 different methods** (Evan is the Assistant Director of the Center for Judicial Engagement at the Institute for Justice, a libertarian public interest law firm. "To Hold Police Accountable, Don't Give Them Immunity," 5/6, FEE, https://fee.org/articles/to-hold-police-accountable-dont-give-them-immunity/) OS |
|
3 |
+There are a variety of possible rules. First, police officers could be held |
|
4 |
+AND |
|
5 |
+officers currently enjoy with a realistic avenue for the vindication of constitutional rights. |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+====Violation: they don't==== |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+====Standards:==== |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+====~~1~~ Stable ground==== |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+====~~2~~ Depth==== |